Date |
Text |
2019-02-22 15:45:00 | CODES IN EFFECT: |
| FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2017 6TH EDITION |
| WPB FBC = WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC 2017 |
| 6TH ED, CHAPTER 1. |
| FBC EC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE ENERGY CONSERVATION 2017 |
| 6TH EDITION |
| FBC EX = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE EXISTING BUILDING 2017 |
| 6TH EDITION |
| FBC RE = FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE 2017 6TH EDITION |
| NEC = NFPA 70 2014 EDITION, NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE |
| FS = FLORIDA STATUTES |
| |
| ELECTRICAL REVIEW STATUS: DENIED, SEE COMMENTS BELOW. |
| |
| 1. INDICATE ON PLANS WHICH ROOMS/AREAS SHALL BE WIRED |
| PER NEC 517.13. |
| 2. PROVIDE PANEL BOARD BONDING PER NEC 517.14. |
| 3. PANEL SCHEDULES SHOW DEMAND FACTORS FOR VARIOUS |
| ITEMS THAT DON'T SEEM TO BE CODE COMPLIANT. FOR |
| EXAMPLE, SOME LIGHTING IS SHOWN WITH A DEMAND FACTOR OF |
| 40%, BUT THE PLAN DOES NOT CLARIFY WHAT THESE AREAS |
| ARE. THIS DEMAND FACTOR CANNOT BE APPLIED TO AREAS OF A |
| HOSPITAL WHERE THE LIGHTING LOAD IS LIKELY TO BE USED |
| AT ONE TIME, SUCH AS AN EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT. PROVIDE |
| CLARIFICATION. ANOTHER EXAMPLE IS THE DEMAND FACTOR OF |
| 85% APPLIED TO SOME AREAS. WHAT IS THE CODE REFERENCE |
| THAT PERMITS THIS? ALSO, THE DEMAND FACTORS FOR |
| RECEPTACLE LOADS IS NOT COMPLIANT WITH NEC TABLE |
| 220.44. PROVIDE CORRECTIONS AS NEEDED, AND UPDATE LOAD |
| SUMMARIES TO REFLECT CHANGES. NEC 220; WPB FBC 107.2.1 |
| 4. SHEET E-701 PROVIDES LOAD SUMMARIES AND SHOWS THE |
| EXISTING LOADS FOR EACH OF THOSE SUMMARIES. WHERE IS |
| THIS INFORMATION FROM, HOW ARE THESE EXISTING LOADS |
| DETERMINED? PROVIDE CLARIFICATION. NEC 220; WPB FBC |
| 107.2.1 |
| 5. BE ADVISED THAT FIRE ALARM, LOW VOLTAGE SYSTEMS, |
| DAS, LIGHTNING PROTECTION, GENERATORS, COMMERCIAL HOOD |
| SYSTEMS, WALK IN COOLERS, SIGNS, SITE LIGHTING, AND |
| SWIMMING POOLS (WHERE APPLICABLE) ARE NOT INCLUDED IN |
| THE SCOPE OF THIS PLAN REVIEW. PROVIDE A BLOCK NOTE |
| INDICATING THE REQUIRED SEPARATE PERMITS AND PLAN |
| SUBMITTALS FOR ANY OF THESE SYSTEMS PRESENT. WPB FBC |
| 105.1, 107.2.1 |
| |
| |
| END OF COMMENTS. |
| |
| PLEASE NOTE: SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED |
| MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. WHEN |
| RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE |
| LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY |
| RESUBMITTAL FORM. ADDITIONALLY, INSERT CORRECTED PAGES |
| INTO THE ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL AND REMOVE THE PREVIOUSLY |
| REVIEWED SHEETS. ONE COPY OF THE PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED |
| SHEETS SHOULD REMAIN IN PACKAGE AND BE MARKED OLD |
| SHEETS. |
| |
| SINCERELY, |
| |
| JOHN PEARSON |
| ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER |
| 561-805-6746 |
| [email protected] |
| |