Date |
Text |
2018-12-31 16:27:52 | FAILED |
| |
| 1) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE A SITE PLAN OR SURVEY |
| SHOWING THE BUILDING SETBACKS. --- CONTRARY TO THE |
| COMMENT RESPONSES, NOT SITE PLAN OR SURVEY SHOWING |
| BUILDING SETBACKS WAS PROVIDED WITH THE RESUBMITTAL. |
| |
| 2) REVISED COMMENT: THE ROOF DOES NOT MATCH THE PLANS |
| APPROVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION. THE LOWEST LEVEL OF |
| ROOF HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM THE PERMIT PLANS. --- AT THE |
| MEETING BETWEEN DESIGN PROFESSIONALS AND STAFF |
| AGREEMENT WAS REACHED TO HAVE THE COPPER ROOF MATERIAL |
| EXTEND DOWN TO COVER ALL THE NEW HORIZONTAL AREAS THAT |
| REPLACED THE SLOPED ROOF ON THE CITY COMMISSION |
| APPROVED PLANS. NO NEW ELEVATION DRAWINGS WERE |
| SUBMITTED TO VERIFY THIS (SHEETS DA201 THROUGH DA203). |
| |
| 3) REPEAT COMMENT: THE PLANS ARE UNCLEAR TO THE DEPTH |
| OF THE HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL MULLIONS. THE APPROVED |
| PLANS WERE TO EXPAND THE LOBBY WITH THE SAME DEPTH OF |
| THE MULLIONS. SHEET DA303 SEEMS TO INDICATE HORIZONTAL |
| MULLION DEPTH, BUT DOES NOT GIVE DETAILS ON THE DEPTH, |
| NOR HOW IT COMPARES TO THE EXISTING MULLION DEPTH. |
| PROVIDE INFORMATION TO VERIFY THAT THE HORIZONTAL AND |
| VERTICAL MULLIONS ARE THE SAME AS EXISTING. ------ THE |
| COMMENT RESPONSES REFERENCE DETAILS 8 AND 9 ON SHEET |
| DA603 AS WELL AS AN ATTACHED PHOTO TO ADDRESS THIS |
| COMMENT. NEITHER SHEET DA603 NOR THE PHOTO WAS INCLUDED |
| IN THE RESUBMITTAL. |
| |
| CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 |
| [email protected] |
| |
| |