Date |
Text |
2019-03-19 10:50:51 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) REVISION, SECOND BUILDING REVIEW |
| CHECKLIST. |
| CODE: FBC 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| |
| 1- A) OK. SAME ARCH. |
| |
| B) OK. |
| |
| C) OK. |
| |
| D) OK. |
| |
| |
| ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| 2- SIZE OF ENTRY DOOR DOESN'T COMPLY WITH SEC. R311.2 |
| FBC-RESIDENTIAL. NEED 32" MIN. CLEAR OPENING. REVISE AS |
| REQUIRED. TYPICALLY 36" DOORS ARE THE ONES THAT COMPLY. |
| |
| RESPONSE: |
| RESPONSE LETTER STATES "STRUCTURAL ENGINEER HAS REVISED |
| S-1 SHEET TO SHOW CORRECT DOOR OPENING SIZE". SHEET S-1 |
| SHOWS 5'-4" OPENING SIZE. DOUBLE 3'X8' DOORS DON'T FIT |
| IN THIS OPENING. REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY |
| AMENDMENTS. |
| |
| ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| 3- SPECIFY ON PLANS THE EXISTING HOUSE AND EQUIPMENT |
| FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION AND THE PROPOSED ADDITION AND |
| EQUIPMENT FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION. SEC. 94-546 CITY |
| ORDINANCE. NOTE: APPROVED PLANS SPECIFIED THE EXISTING |
| AND PROPOSED FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION TO BE 8.05'. BEFORE |
| 10/05/17 CITY ORDINANCE REQUIRED 1 FOOT FREE BOARD |
| ABOVE THE BASE FLOOD ELEVATION. THEREFORE, THIS |
| ELEVATION WAS IN COMPLIANCE. ELEVATION CERTIFICATES |
| WILL BE REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION. |
| |
| RESPONSE: |
| REPEAT COMMENT. ELEVATION CERTIFICATES HAVE NOT BEEN |
| SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW. |
| |
| ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| 4- SHEET S-6: DOORS AND WINDOWS DESIGN PRESSURES SHOWN |
| ON 1ST AND 2ND FLOOR PLAN DON'T MATCH DESIGN PRESSURES |
| SHOWN ON THE TABLE ON SAME SHEET. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO |
| MATCH. ALSO, DESIGN PRESSURES CAN NOT BE LOWER ON THE |
| SECOND FLOOR THAN THE FIRST FLOOR. DESIGN PRESSURES CAN |
| NOT BE LOWER FOR OPENINGS THAT ARE SMALLER. REVISE AS |
| REQUIRED. NOTE: THE EDGE DISTANCE IS 4'-0" MIN AS |
| REQUIRED BY NOTE AT THE BOTTOM OF FIGURE R301.2(7) |
| FBC-RESIDENTIAL. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| |
| RESPONSE: |
| REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| RESPONSE LETTER STATES "STRUCTURAL ENGINEER HAS REVISED |
| S-6 TO SHOW WIND PRESSURES". DRAWING WAS NOT REVISED. |
| |
| 5- OK. |
| |
| 4- OK. |
| |
| ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| 5- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY |
| FAC 61G20-3.001 FOR SECOND FLOOR BALCONY DECK COVERING. |
| AND, CLEARLY IDENTIFY WHICH APPROVED ASSEMBLY IS GOING |
| TO BE USED. NOTE: COORDINATE WITH ITEM #5 ABOVE. |
| |
| RESPONSE: |
| REPEAT COMMENT. PRODUCT APPROVAL NOT SUBMITTED. |
| |
| 6- OK. |
| |
| IMPORTANT NOTES: |
| (1) ELEVATION CERTIFICATES WILL BE REQUIRED DURING |
| CONSTRUCTION. (********ELEVATION CERTIFICATES NO |
| PROVIDED YET AS OF 03/19/19). |
| (2)GARAGE FLOOD VENTS NEED TO BE INSTALLED BELOW THE |
| BASE FLOOD ELEVATION (********ELEVATION CERTIFICATES NO |
| PROVIDED YET AS OF 03/19/19). |
| (3) ORIGINAL PERMIT WAS APPROVED WITH PROVISO. PROVIDE |
| REQUIRED INFORMATION . SEE COPY OF PROVISO BELOW. |
| (*****NOT ADDRESSED YET AS OF 03/19/19). |
| |
| |
| ****PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH |
| COMMENT TO HELP EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. |
| ****PLEASE INSERT ANY REVISED DRAWING AND REMOVE OLD |
| DRAWING. SUBMIT OLD DRAWINGS FOR REFERENCE OF ALREADY |
| REVIEWED DRAWINGS. DO NOT STAPLE OLD DRAWINGS TO PLANS. |
| |
| |
| IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT |
| JULIO GOMEZ |
| COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| BUILDING DIVISION |
| (561)805-6712 |
| [email protected] |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| BUILDING REVIEW APPROVED WITH PROVISO: ******(DATED |
| 02/01/17) |
| 1- PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS/SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE |
| INSTALLATION OF BRICK VENEER, INCLUDING VENEER SUPPORTS |
| AT OPENINGS. ALSO, SPECIFY WEEP-HOLES, ETC. |
| NOTE: PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS/ SPECIFICATIONS. DON'T |
| CITE CODE SECTIONS. |
| |
| 2- ENERGY CALCULATIONS WERE REVISED FOR FULL HOUSE |
| COMPLIANCE INSTEAD OF ADDITION ALONE: |
| A) REVISE CEILING INSULATION ITEM #10 TO MATCH PLANS. |
| VENTED AND UNVENTED ROOFS. |
| B) REVISE ROOF MATERIAL SHOWN ON PAGE 2 OF 5 TO MATCH |
| PLANS AND PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED. |
| C) REVISE CONCRETE BLOCK INSULATION ITEM #9 DOESN'T |
| MATCH PLANS. SEE DETAIL #2 ON SHEET A-10. |
| D) REVISE R-VALUE SHOWN ON THE CEILING INSULATION ON |
| PAGE 3 OF 5 TO MATCH PLANS AND INFORMATION SHOWN ON |
| ITEM #10. |
| E) REVISE DOOR TYPE SPECIFIED ON PAGE 3 OF 5 TO MATCH |
| PLANS AND PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED. THERE ARE NO |
| INSULATED DOORS. DOORS WITH GLASS NEED TO BE INCLUDED |
| IN THE WINDOWS AREA. |
| F) REVISE WINDOWS OVERHANG DEPTH AND SEPARATION TO |
| MATCH PLANS. |
| G) REVISE NUMBER OF OCCUPANTS ON PAGE 2 OF 5. WHY 20 |
| PEOPLE IN A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE. |
| H) REVISE FLOOR TYPES ON PAGE 2 OF 5. 2ND FLOOR IS NOT |
| ON SLAB ON GRADE. |
| |
| 3- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY |
| FAC 61G20-3.002(33) FOR: |
| A) GARAGE DOORS THAT MEETS ALL THE DESIGN LOADS SHOWN |
| ON SHEET S-6 (POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE). |
| B) DOUBLE EXTERIOR DOORS THAT MEET THE DESIGN PRESSURES |
| SPECIFIED ON PLANS. |
| |
| 4- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE ABOVE |
| PRODUCT APPROVALS. |