Date |
Text |
2019-01-10 15:20:41 | CODES IN EFFECT: |
| FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2017 6TH EDITION |
| WPB FBC = WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA |
| BUILDING CODE 2017 6TH ED. |
| FBC EC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE ENERGY CONSERVATION 2017 |
| 6TH EDITION |
| FBC RE = FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE 2017 6TH EDITION |
| NEC = NFPA 70 2014 EDITION, NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE |
| FS = FLORIDA STATUTES |
| |
| ELECTRICAL REVIEW STATUS: DENIED, SEE COMMENTS BELOW. |
| |
| PREVIOUS COMMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED |
| SATISFACTORILY ARE MARKED AS CORRECTED. PREVIOUS |
| COMMENTS THAT HAVE NOT BEEN ADDRESSED SATISFACTORILY |
| HAVE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS IN PARENTHESES, NOTED FOR |
| THIRD REVIEW. ANY NEW COMMENTS WILL BE LISTED AFTER |
| PREVIOUS COMMENTS. |
| |
| THESE IS A SUBSTANTIAL AMOUNT OF INFORMATION ON THE |
| SUBMITTED PLANS THAT IS NOT TO CODE. PLEASE BE ADVISED |
| THAT SOME OF THESE COMMENTS HAVE NOT BEEN ADDRESSED FOR |
| TWO REVIEWS. IF UPON THE NEXT REVIEW, IF IT IS |
| NECESSARY TO REJECT THE SUBMITTED PLAN AGAIN FOR THE |
| SAME REASONS, AN ADDITIONAL PLAN REVIEW IS REQUIRED. |
| FLORIDA STATUTES STATE: WITH RESPECT TO EVALUATION OF |
| DESIGN PROFESSIONALS DOCUMENTS, IF A LOCAL GOVERNMENT |
| FINDS IT NECESSARY, IN ORDER TO ENFORCE COMPLIANCE WITH |
| THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE AND ISSUE A PERMIT, TO REJECT |
| DESIGN DOCUMENTS REQUIRED BY THE CODE THREE OR MORE |
| TIMES FOR FAILURE TO CORRECT A CODE VIOLATION |
| SPECIFICALLY AND CONTINUOUSLY NOTED IN EACH REJECTION, |
| INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION, |
| STRUCTURAL STABILITY, ENERGY, ACCESSIBILITY, LIGHTING, |
| VENTILATION, ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, AND GAS |
| SYSTEMS, OR OTHER REQUIREMENTS IDENTIFIED BY RULE OF |
| THE FLORIDA BUILDING COMMISSION ADOPTED PURSUANT TO |
| CHAPTER 120, THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT SHALL IMPOSE, EACH |
| TIME AFTER THE THIRD SUCH REVIEW THE PLANS ARE REJECTED |
| FOR THAT CODE VIOLATION, A FEE OF FOUR TIMES THE AMOUNT |
| OF THE PROPORTION OF THE PERMIT FEE ATTRIBUTED TO PLANS |
| REVIEW. FS 553.80(2)(B) THE ADDITIONAL FEE FOR THIS |
| PROJECT WOULD BE $550.00. THIS IS BASED ON CURRENT |
| PERMIT VALUE SHOWN OF $25,000.00 |
| |
| 1. PROVIDE PANEL SCHEDULE FOR EACH PANEL INDICATING ANY |
| NEW OR ALTERED CIRCUITS, THE WIRE AND BREAKER SIZE FOR |
| THESE CIRCUITS, AND AFCI OR GFCI PROTECTION WHERE |
| APPLICABLE TO COMPLY WITH CODE. NEC 210.8, 210.12, |
| 210.19, 215.2, 215.5, 310.15(B)(16), 408.4; WPB FBC |
| 107.3.5 (ELECTRICAL SERVICES ARE EITHER 120/208 VOLT 3 |
| PHASE, OR 120/240 VOLT 3 PHASE (WHICH HAS A HIGH LEG). |
| INDICATION ON PLAN IS THAT THE SERVICE IS 230 VOLT 3 |
| PHASE, BUT THERE ARE LOADS SHOWN ON B PHASE WHICH WOULD |
| BE THE HIGH LEG. PROVIDE CLARIFICATION AND CORRECTIONS |
| AS NEEDED TO ACCURATELY REFLECT THE INSTALLATION.)(3RD |
| REVIEW: PANEL SCHEDULES ARE STILL SHOWING THE WRONG |
| VOLTAGE. PANEL A IS SHOWN BEING FED FROM B PHASE OF |
| PANEL B, WHICH WOULD CREATE A HIGH LEG ON PANEL A AND |
| PANEL A1, WHICH SHOW LOADS THAT SHOULD NOT BE CONNECTED |
| TO A HIGH LEG.) |
| 2. CORRECTED. |
| 3. CORRECTED. |
| 4. CORRECTED. |
| 5. CORRECTED. |
| 6. CORRECTED. |
| 7. CORRECTED. |
| 8. CORRECTED. |
| 9. PROVIDE THE ADDITIONAL AUTOMATIC LIGHTING CONTROLS |
| STIPULATED IN THE FBC ENERGY CODE. FBC EC C405.2 (3RD |
| REVIEW, NOT PROVIDED. THIS IS A CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY, |
| AUTOMATIC LIGHTING CONTROL IS REQUIRED.) |
| 10. PROVIDE LOAD CALCULATION FOR SERVICE, INCLUDE |
| EXISTING AND NEW LOADS TO CONFIRM CAPACITY OF SERVICE |
| IS ADEQUATE. NEC 215.2, 220, 408.30 (NOT PROVIDED.)(3RD |
| REVIEW: LOAD CALCULATION NOT CORRECT. AS EXPLAINED IN |
| MEETING WITH EOR, A 50% DEMAND FACTOR FOR RECEPTACLE |
| LOAD OVER 10,000 VA IS NOT PERMITTED AS SHOWN. ANY |
| EQUIPMENT FED FROM AN OUTLET MUST BE CALCULATED AT 100% |
| FOR NON-CONTINUOUS LOAD AND 125% FOR A CONTINUOUS LOAD. |
| NEC 215.2, 220.14(A). ADDITIONALLY, THERE ARE LOADS |
| SHOWN IN LOAD CALCULATION THAT ARE NOT SHOWN ANYWHERE |
| ELSE ON PLAN. PROVIDE CORRECTIONS.) |
| 11. CORRECTED. |
| 12. CORRECTED. |
| 13. CORRECTED. |
| |
| NEW COMMENTS: |
| |
| 14. CORDS ARE NOT TO BE USED IN LIEU OF PERMANENT |
| WIRING METHODS, EXCEPT AS PERMITTED PER CODE. |
| BREWMATION CONTROL DIAGRAM SHOWS CORDS GOING TO ALL OF |
| THE EQUIPMENT FED FROM THIS CONTROL STATION. PROVIDE |
| CLARIFICATION AND /OR CORRECTIONS. NEC 110.3, 400.7, |
| 400.8 |
| 15. VALUE FOR WORK STATED ON PERMIT APPLICATION APPEARS |
| LOW. PROVIDE COPY OF SIGNED CONTRACT WITH SCOPE AND |
| VALUE OF WORK, TO INCLUDE ALL MATERIALS AND LABOR. THIS |
| IS FOR TOTAL PROJECT, NOT JUST ELECTRICAL. WPB FBC |
| 109.3 |
| 16. RISER DIAGRAM SHOWS PARALLEL 4/0 WIRE FEEDING METER |
| CAN AND PANEL B. THIS WIRE IS UNDERSIZED FOR THE LOAD |
| SHOWN. THIS ALSO CONFLICTS WITH WHAT IS SHOWN IN PANEL |
| SCHEDULE. PROVIDE CORRECTION. NEC 310.15(B)(16) |
| 17. GROUNDING ELECTRODE CONNECTIONS ARE SHOWN IN RISER |
| DIAGRAM AT METER CAN AND AT PANEL B. THE GROUNDING |
| ELECTRODE SYSTEM IS TIED TO THE SERVICE IN ONE LOCATION |
| ONLY. GROUNDING ELECTRODE CONDUCTORS SHOULD NOT BE |
| INSTALLED TO PANEL B. PROVIDE CORRECTION. NEC 250.6, |
| 250.24 |
| 18. SERVICE RISER FROM METER CAN TO FPL SERVICE SHOULD |
| NOT INCLUDE AN EQUIPMENT GROUNDING CONDUCTOR. PROVIDE |
| CORRECTION. NEC 250.6, 250.24, 250.121 |
| |
| END OF COMMENTS. |
| |
| PLEASE NOTE: SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED |
| MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. WHEN |
| RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE |
| LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY |
| RESUBMITTAL FORM. ADDITIONALLY, INSERT CORRECTED PAGES |
| INTO THE ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL AND REMOVE OR VOID THE |
| PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS. |
| |
| SINCERELY, |
| |
| JOHN PEARSON |
| ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER |
| 561-805-6746 |
| [email protected] |
| |