Date |
Text |
2018-07-17 07:45:28 | CODES IN EFFECT: |
| FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2017 6TH EDITION |
| FBC EC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE ENERGY CONSERVATION 2017 |
| 6TH EDITION |
| FBC RE = FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE 2017 6TH EDITION |
| NEC = NFPA 70 2014 EDITION, NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE |
| FS = FLORIDA STATUTES |
| |
| ELECTRICAL REVIEW STATUS: DENIED, SEE COMMENTS BELOW. |
| |
| PREVIOUS COMMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED |
| SATISFACTORILY ARE MARKED AS CORRECTED. PREVIOUS |
| COMMENTS THAT HAVE NOT BEEN ADDRESSED SATISFACTORILY |
| HAVE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS IN PARENTHESES. ANY NEW |
| COMMENTS WILL BE LISTED AFTER PREVIOUS COMMENTS. |
| |
| 1. PROVIDE ACCURATE LOAD CALCULATION INCLUDING ALL |
| LOADS. ALL LOADS SUPPLIED ARE THE SAME FOR EACH PANEL |
| EVEN THOUGH THERE ARE DIFFERENCES IN EACH UNIT. ALSO, |
| THE PANEL SCHEDULE SHOWS 10 KW HEAT FOR THE AHU, BUT |
| YOU HAVE INCLUDED 3.25 KW IN LOAD CALCULATION. THERE |
| SHOULD BE ONE LOAD CALCULATION FOR ENTIRE SERVICE, AND |
| THEN A LOAD CALCULATION FOR EACH SUB-PANEL ALSO. NEC |
| 220 (LOAD CALCULATION PROVIDED IS NOT CODE COMPLIANT. |
| DEMAND FACTORS HAVE BEEN APPLIED TO EACH PANEL, AND |
| THEN AGAIN BASED ON 220.84. THAT CODE SECTION EXPLAINS |
| THAT THE LOADS ARE ALL ADDED TOGETHER AND THEN A DEMAND |
| FACTOR IS APPLIED ONE TIME. PROVIDE ACCURATE LOAD |
| CALCULATION.) |
| 2. PROVIDE ACCURATE RISER DIAGRAM, SHOWING ALL DETAILS |
| OF SERVICE EQUIPMENT, UNDERGROUND OR OVERHEAD SERVICE, |
| WIRE AND BREAKER SIZES FOR SERVICE AND FEED TO ANY |
| SUB-PANEL(S). SHOW GEC SIZE AND SYSTEM, SHOW |
| INTERSYSTEM BONDING TERMINATION POINT. PLAN CURRENTLY |
| SHOWS DISCONNECT A FEEDING NOTHING, DISCONNECT B |
| FEEDING PANEL A, AND DISCONNECT C FEEDING PANEL B. ALSO |
| NEED TO SHOW WIRE SIZE FOR SERVICE LATERAL. PROVIDE |
| CORRECTIONS. NEC 215.5, 230, 250.50, 250.94, 408.30 |
| (THIS IS MOSTLY CORRECTED, BUT SHOWS A 130 AMP BREAKER |
| FEEDING APARTMENT 3. THIS IS NOT A STANDARD FUSE SIZE |
| PER 240.6. PROVIDE CORRECTION.) |
| 3. CORRECTED. |
| 4. PLAN SHOWS AFCI COVERAGE FOR SOME RECEPTACLE OUTLETS |
| BUT NOT LIGHTING. THIS COVERAGE IS NOT TO CODE AND NOT |
| COMPLETE. CODE REQUIRES: "BRANCH CIRCUITS THAT SUPPLY |
| 120-VOLT, SINGLE-PHASE, 15- AND 20-AMPERE OUTLETS |
| INSTALLED IN KITCHENS, FAMILY ROOMS, DINING ROOMS, |
| LIVING ROOMS, PARLORS, LIBRARIES, DENS, BEDROOMS, |
| SUN-ROOMS, RECREATIONS ROOMS, CLOSETS, HALLWAYS, |
| LAUNDRY AREAS AND SIMILAR ROOMS OR AREAS SHALL BE AFCI |
| PROTECTED." PROVIDE CORRECTION. NEC 210.12 (NOTE |
| PROVIDED FOR THIS IS IN CONFLICT WITH THE ABOVE |
| STATEMENT. SOME AREAS WILL REQUIRE BOTH AFCI AND GFCI |
| PROTECTION. THIS SHOULD ALSO BE REFLECTED IN PANEL |
| SCHEDULE.) |
| 5. CORRECTED. |
| 6. PROVIDE ACCURATE PANEL SCHEDULES, THE WIRE AND |
| BREAKER SIZE FOR THESE CIRCUITS, AND AFCI OR GFCI |
| PROTECTION WHERE APPLICABLE TO COMPLY WITH CODE. ALL |
| PANEL SCHEDULES PROVIDED ARE IDENTICAL EVEN THOUGH THE |
| UNITS ARE DIFFERENT. CIRCUITS SHOULD HAVE UNIQUE |
| IDENTIFICATION. NEC 210.8, 210.12, 215.5, 408.4 (AFCI |
| PROTECTION NOT LISTED COMPLETELY.) |
| 7. CORRECTED. |
| 8. CORRECTED. |
| 9. CORRECTED. |
| |
| NEW COMMENT: |
| |
| 10. BE ADVISED THAT SOME OF THESE COMMENTS HAVE NOT |
| BEEN ADDRESSED FOR TWO REVIEWS. IF UPON THE THIRD |
| REVIEW, IF IT IS NECESSARY TO REJECT THE SUBMITTED PLAN |
| A THIRD TIME FOR THE SAME REASONS, AN ADDITIONAL PLAN |
| REVIEW IS REQUIRED. FLORIDA STATUTES STATE: WITH |
| RESPECT TO EVALUATION OF DESIGN PROFESSIONALS |
| DOCUMENTS, IF A LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINDS IT NECESSARY, IN |
| ORDER TO ENFORCE COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA BUILDING |
| CODE AND ISSUE A PERMIT, TO REJECT DESIGN DOCUMENTS |
| REQUIRED BY THE CODE THREE OR MORE TIMES FOR FAILURE TO |
| CORRECT A CODE VIOLATION SPECIFICALLY AND CONTINUOUSLY |
| NOTED IN EACH REJECTION, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, |
| EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION, STRUCTURAL STABILITY, ENERGY, |
| ACCESSIBILITY, LIGHTING, VENTILATION, ELECTRICAL, |
| MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, AND GAS SYSTEMS, OR OTHER |
| REQUIREMENTS IDENTIFIED BY RULE OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING |
| COMMISSION ADOPTED PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 120, THE LOCAL |
| GOVERNMENT SHALL IMPOSE, EACH TIME AFTER THE THIRD SUCH |
| REVIEW THE PLANS ARE REJECTED FOR THAT CODE VIOLATION, |
| A FEE OF FOUR TIMES THE AMOUNT OF THE PROPORTION OF THE |
| PERMIT FEE ATTRIBUTED TO PLANS REVIEW. FS 553.80(2)(B)? |
| (PLAN REVIEW FEE ADDED.) |
| |
| END OF COMMENTS. |
| |
| PLEASE NOTE: SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED |
| MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. WHEN |
| RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE |
| LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY |
| RESUBMITTAL FORM. ADDITIONALLY, INSERT CORRECTED PAGES |
| INTO THE ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL AND REMOVE OR VOID THE |
| PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS. |
| |
| SINCERELY, |
| |
| JOHN PEARSON |
| ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER |
| 561-805-6746 |
| [email protected] |
| |
| |