| Date |
Text |
| 2017-12-29 16:15:42 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE |
| | MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | |
| | 1) THE PROPOSED PROJECT CHANGES A BUSINESS OCCUPANCY TO |
| | AN ASSEMBY OCCUPANCY. |
| | |
| | SHEET A0.14 INDICATES EXIT DOORS 001, 002, 010 & 011. |
| | SHEET AO.13 INDICATES A DOOR SCHEDULE WHICH SHOWS |
| | VARIOUS HARDWARE SETS FOR THOSE DOORS. NO PANIC |
| | HARDWARE IS INDICATED |
| | |
| | PER NFPA 101, CHAPTER 12, NEW ASSEMBLY OCCUPNACIES: |
| | |
| | 12.2.2.2 DOORS. |
| | 12.2.2.2.1 DOORS COMPLYING WITH 7.2.1 SHALL BE |
| | PERMITTED. |
| | |
| | 12.2.2.2.3 ANY DOOR IN A REQUIRED MEANS OF EGRESS FROM |
| | AN AREA HAVING AN OCCUPANT LOAD OF 100 OR MORE PERSONS |
| | SHALL BE PERMITTED TO BE PROVIDED WITH A LATCH OR LOCK |
| | ONLY IF THE LATCH OR LOCK IS PANIC HARDWARE OR FIRE |
| | EXIT HARDWARE COMPLYING WITH 7.2.1.7, UNLESS OTHERWISE |
| | PERMITTED BY ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: |
| | (1) THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL NOT APPLY TO DELAYED-EGRESS |
| | LOCKS AS PERMITTED IN 12.2.2.2.5. |
| | (2) THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL NOT APPLY TO |
| | ACCESS-CONTROLLED EGRESS DOORS AS PERMITTED IN |
| | 12.2.2.2.6. |
| | |
| | 12.2.2.2.4 LOCKING DEVICES COMPLYING WITH 7.2.1.5.5 |
| | SHALL BE PERMITTED TO BE USED ON A SINGLE DOOR OR A |
| | SINGLE PAIR OF DOORS IF BOTH OF THE FOLLOWING |
| | CONDITIONS APPLY: |
| | (1) THE DOOR OR PAIR OF DOORS SERVE AS THE MAIN EXIT |
| | AND THE ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY HAS AN OCCUPANT LOAD NOT |
| | GREATER THAN 500. |
| | (2) ANY LATCHING DEVICES ON SUCH A DOOR(S) FROM AN |
| | ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY HAVING AN OCCUPANT LOAD OF 100 OR |
| | MORE ARE RELEASED BY PANIC HARDWARE OR FIRE EXIT |
| | HARDWARE. |
| | |
| | PLEASE REVIEW AND CORRECT OR JUSTIFY WITH SPECIFIC FIRE |
| | CODE REFERENCES. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 2) SHEET A1.11- PATIO DOORS ARE INDICATED AROUND THE |
| | EXTERIOR OF THE PROJECT. THOUGH THESE DOORS ARE |
| | EXISTING THE HARDWARE SHALL BE INDICATED OF THE THE |
| | DOOR SCHEDULE. |
| | |
| | PLEASE INCLUDE ALL DOOR HARDWARE OF ALL PATIO DOORS ON |
| | THE DOOR SCHEDULE. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 3) SHEET AO.13 - THE DOOR SCHEDULE INDICATES HARDWARE |
| | ON SOME OF THE PATIO DOORS. HOWEVER, THEY APPEAR TO |
| | INDICATE EXITING OUT ONTO THE PATIO. WHAT TYPE OF |
| | HARDWARE IS ON THESE DOORS THAT ALLOWS THEM BACK IN? |
| | WHAT IS THE OCCUPANCY SPACE OF THE PATIO? WILL PEOPLE |
| | BE ALLOWED TO GATHER ON THE PATIO? IF THE OCCUPANCY |
| | TOTAL IS OVER 50 THE EXIT DOORS FROM THE PATION ARE |
| | REQUIRED TO SWING IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL. |
| | |
| | PER NFPA 101, CHAPTER 7, MEANS OF EGRESS: |
| | |
| | 7.2.1.4.2 DOOR LEAF SWING DIRECTION. DOOR LEAVES |
| | REQUIRED TO BE OF THE SIDE-HINGED OR PIVOTED-SWINGING |
| | TYPE SHALL SWING IN THE DIRECTION OF EGRESS TRAVEL |
| | UNDER ANY OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: |
| | (1) WHERE SERVING A ROOM OR AREA WITH AN OCCUPANT LOAD |
| | OF 50 OR MORE, EXCEPT UNDER ANY OF THE FOLLOWING |
| | CONDITIONS: |
| | (A) DOOR LEAVES IN HORIZONTAL EXITS SHALL NOT BE |
| | REQUIRED TO SWING IN THE DIRECTION OF EGRESS TRAVEL |
| | WHERE PERMITTED BY 7.2.4.3.8.1 OR 7.2.4.3.8.2. |
| | (B) DOOR LEAVES IN SMOKE BARRIERS SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED |
| | TO SWING IN THE DIRECTION OF EGRESS TRAVEL IN EXISTING |
| | HEALTH CARE OCCUPANCIES, AS PROVIDED IN CHAPTER 19. |
| | (2) WHERE THE DOOR ASSEMBLY IS USED IN AN EXIT |
| | ENCLOSURE, UNLESS THE DOOR OPENING SERVES AN INDIVIDUAL |
| | LIVING UNIT THAT OPENS DIRECTLY INTO AN EXIT ENCLOSURE |
| | (3) WHERE THE DOOR OPENING SERVES A HIGH HAZARD |
| | CONTENTS AREA |
| | |
| | IF THE PATIO DOORS ARE EXIT DOORS, THE EXIT PATH IS NOT |
| | INDICATED ON THE LIFE SAFETY PLAN. IF THESE DOORS DO |
| | NOT LEAD TO A DEFINED EXIT, THEY ARE NO EXIT DOORS. SEE |
| | # 6 BELOW. |
| | PLEASE REVIEW AND CORRECT OR JUSTIFY WITH SPECIFIC FIRE |
| | CODE REFERENCES. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 4) SHEETS A 1.13 - NOTE # 7 INDICATES SOUND PANELS ON |
| | THE CEILING. THERE ARE NO INDICATIONS OF HOW THESE WILL |
| | BE FASTENED? THERE ARE NO MANUFACTURES SPECIFICATION |
| | SHEETS TO VERIFY INTERIOR FINISH CODE COMPLIANCE. |
| | |
| | PER NFPA 101, CHAPTER 12 |
| | |
| | 12.3.3 INTERIOR FINISH. |
| | 12.3.3.1 GENERAL. INTERIOR FINISH SHALL BE IN |
| | ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 10.2. |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 5) SHEET A1.11 - NOTE # 8 INDICATES FLOORING PER |
| | MANUFACTURESE SPECIFICATIONS. THE IS NO FLOORING |
| | DOCUMENT OR INDICATIONS THAT CAN BE EASYILY OR |
| | DIFNITIVELY IDENTIFIED. |
| | |
| | PER NFPA 101, CHAPTER 12 |
| | |
| | 12.3.3.5 INTERIOR FLOOR FINISH |
| | 12.3.3.5.1 INTERIOR FLOOR FINSIH SHALL COMPLY WITH |
| | SECTION10.2. |
| | 12.3.3.5.2 INTERIOR FLOOR FINISH IN EXIT ENCLOSURES AND |
| | EXIT ACCESS CORRIDORS AND IN SPACES NOT SEPARATED FROM |
| | THEM BY WALLS COMPLYING WITH 12.3.6 SHALL BE NOT LESS |
| | THAN CLASS II. |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 6) SHEET E 2.1 - THERE ARE EXIT SIGNS OVER THE PATIO |
| | DOORS LEADING OUT ONTO THE PATIO AREA. THERE IS NO |
| | DEFINED EXIT INDICATED FROM THIS PATION SPACE. THE LIFE |
| | SAFETY PLAN DOES NOT INDICATE A DEFINED EXIT FROM THE |
| | PATIO SPACE. |
| | |
| | IF THE PATIO AREA DOES NOT HAVE A DEFINED EXIT, THE THE |
| | EXIT SIGNS ABOVE THESE DOORS IN NOT APPLICABLE FROM THE |
| | INTERIOR. ON THE CONTRARY, THESE DOORS MAY NEED TO HAVE |
| | EXIT SIGN INDICATORS ON THE EXTERIOR LEADING IN. |
| | |
| | EITHER WAY IT IS NOT CLEAR IF A PERSON CAN EXIT THE |
| | PATIO AREA WITH THIS PLAN SUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | PLEASE REVIEW AND CORRECT OR CLARIFY WITH DETAILS. |
| | |
| | |
| | 7) WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE PLAN SHEET |
| | REVISION CLOUDS OR NUMBERED NARRATIVE RESPONSES TO THE |
| | ABOVE. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 8) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED ON THE |
| | RE-SUBMITTAL OF THE ABOVE. |
| | |
| | |
| | PETER LEDUC |
| | FIRE MARSHAL |
| | 561-804-4709 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
