| Date |
Text |
| 2018-01-10 19:03:55 | PLAN |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | |
| | 1ST REVIEW: FBC FIFTH EDITION (2014) |
| | ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561) 805-6714 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | DENIED BY BUILDING |
| | PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW: |
| | |
| | 1) ON SHEET A-000 THE CONSTRUCTION TYPE SHOULD BE V-B |
| | AND NOT R-3. R-3 IS THE TYPE OF OCCUPANCY NOT THE |
| | CONSTRUCTION TYPE. FBC CHAPTER 6 |
| | |
| | 2) SUBMIT TWO SETS OF A SURFACE DRAINAGE PLAN. |
| | FBC-R401.3 DRAINAGE. SURFACE DRAINAGE SHALL BE DIVERTED |
| | TO A STORM SEWER CONVEYANCE OR OTHER APPROVED POINT OF |
| | COLLECTION THAT DOES NOT CREATE A HAZARD. LOTS SHALL BE |
| | GRADED TO DRAIN SURFACE WATER AWAY FROM FOUNDATION |
| | WALLS. THE GRADE SHALL FALL A MINIMUM OF 6 INCHES (152 |
| | MM) WITHIN THE FIRST 10 FEET (3048 MM). |
| | EXCEPTION: WHERE LOT LINES, WALLS, SLOPES OR OTHER |
| | PHYSICAL BARRIERS PROHIBIT 6 INCHES (152 MM) OF FALL |
| | WITHIN 10 FEET (3048 MM), DRAINS OR SWALES SHALL BE |
| | CONSTRUCTED TO ENSURE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM THE STRUCTURE. |
| | IMPERVIOUS SURFACES WITHIN 10 FEET (3048 MM) OF THE |
| | BUILDING FOUNDATION SHALL BE SLOPED A MINIMUM OF 2 |
| | PERCENT AWAY FROM THE BUILDING. |
| | FBC 107.2.5 SITE PLAN. THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS |
| | SUBMITTED WITH THE APPLICATION FOR PERMIT SHALL BE |
| | ACCOMPANIED BY A SITE PLAN SHOWING TO SCALE THE SIZE |
| | AND LOCATION OF NEW CONSTRUCTION AND EXISTING |
| | STRUCTURES ON THE SITE, DISTANCES FROM LOT LINES, THE |
| | ESTABLISHED STREET GRADES AND THE PROPOSED FINISHED |
| | GRADES AND, AS APPLICABLE, FLOOD HAZARD AREAS, |
| | FLOODWAYS, AND DESIGN FLOOD ELEVATIONS; AND IT SHALL BE |
| | DRAWN IN ACCORDANCE WITH AN ACCURATE BOUNDARY LINE |
| | SURVEY. |
| | |
| | 3) THE SITE PLAN ON A-100 INCORRECTLY SPECIFIES THIS |
| | STRUCTURE AS TWO STORIES. PLEASE CORRECT. FBC 107.2.1 |
| | |
| | 4) THE DOOR FROM THE GARAGE TO THE RESIDENCE IS |
| | REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH FBC-R302.5.1. |
| | |
| | 5) FBC 107.3.4 - PROVIDE TWO SETS OF PRODUCT APPROVALS |
| | FOR THOSE PRODUCTS WHICH ARE REGULATED BY FAC |
| | 61G20-3.001 PER FLORIDA STATUTE 553.842 (5) THAT HAVE |
| | BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER |
| | OF RECORD. PROVIDE TWO COMPLETE PRODUCT APPROVALS WITH |
| | FL OR NOA NUMBERS INCLUDING INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS |
| | AND MAXIMUM DESIGN PRESSURES FOR THE ROOF TILE, THE |
| | HORIZONTAL SLIDING WINDOWS, THE DOUBLE CASEMENT |
| | WINDOWS, THE DOUBLE HUNG WINDOWS AND THE IN-SWINGING |
| | FRENCH DOORS. |
| | |
| | 6) THE PLANS SHOW IN-SWINGING GLAZED FRENCH DOORS AND |
| | THE PRODUCT APPROVALS THAT WERE SUBMITTED (NOA NO. |
| | 14-0908.07) ARE FOR OUT-SWING GLAZED FRENCH DOORS. FBC |
| | 107.3.4 SUBMIT PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE DOORS SHOWN ON |
| | THE PLANS OR REVISE THE PLANS. FBC 107.3.4 |
| | |
| | 7) THE PLANS SPECIFY DOUBLE HUNG WINDOWS ON SHEET |
| | A-200. THE PRODUCT APPROVALS THAT WERE SUBMITTED (NOA |
| | NO. 16-1003.01) ARE FOR SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS. SUBMIT |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE DOUBLE HUNG WINDOWS THAT ARE |
| | SPECIFIED ON THE PLANS OR REVISE THE PLANS. |
| | |
| | 8) IN ORDER TO REDUCE PLAN REVIEW TIME, PLEASE SUBMIT A |
| | RESPONSE LETTER INDICATING HOW EACH OF THE REVIEW |
| | COMMENTS HAS BEEN ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
