| Date |
Text |
| 2018-07-06 12:26:02 | 07/19/18 TALKED TO ROBERT BROWN. OK TO CLASSIFY THIS |
| | OCCUPANCY AS MERCANTILE INSTEAD OF ART GALLERY. |
| | |
| | |
| | THIRD BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | CODE: FBC 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 1) PLEASE CORRECT THE PERMIT AND PLAN ADDRESS. THE |
| | ADDRESS INDICATED ON BOTH THE PLANS AND PERMIT |
| | APPLICATION INDICATE 925 N RAILROAD AVE. PCN: |
| | 74-43-43-15-20-005-0110. THE LOCATION OF THE BUILDING |
| | SHOWN ON SHEET C-1 IS LOCATED AT THE ADDRESS 1013 N. |
| | RAILROAD AVE. PCN: 74-43-43-15-20-005-0090. PLEASE |
| | CORRECT THE ADDRESS ON THE PERMIT APPLICATION AND |
| | PLANS. SHEET C-1 SHOWS THE SITE AS ONE PROPERTY, |
| | WHEREAS THERE IS 3 LOTS AND 3 ADDRESSES. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | UNITY OF TITLE WAS RECORDED ON 02/15/2018 BUT THERE WAS |
| | NOT REQUEST TO THE CITY TO GET AN ADDRESS. WE GENERATED |
| | AN ADDRESS REVIEW STOP TO GET THE OFFICIAL ADDRESS OF |
| | THIS BUILDING. PLANS WILL NEED TO BE REVISED SHOWING |
| | THE APPROVED ADDRESS. APPLICANT TO COORDINATE |
| | ADDRESSING ISSUE WITH: |
| | MICHAEL ORIO |
| | GIS SUPPORT SPECIALIST |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT |
| | 401 CLEMATIS STREET ? WEST PALM BEACH ? FLORIDA 33401 |
| | P: 561.494.1080 | WWW.WPB.ORG |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 2- SHEET A1 AND A2 EXISTING AND DEMOLITION PLAN. ON THE |
| | WEST SIDE OF THE BUILDING A EXISTING CORRIDOR. |
| | PALM BEACH COUNTY AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY SHOWS FROM |
| | 2009-2014 THIS AREA BEING A OPEN AIR LOADING PLATFORM. |
| | IN JAN. 31/2016 THIS AREA HAS BEEN ENCLOSED ON THE |
| | NORTH AND WEST WITH A WALL AND A ROOF FRAMING AND |
| | ROOFING SYSTEM BUILT WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF PERMIT AND |
| | INSPECTIONS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | DETAIL A/6 ON SHEET A-4: |
| | 2A)IT IS NOT CLEAR HOW THE SIMPSON HETA 20 IS INSTALLED |
| | IN AN EXISTING CONCRETE BLOCK WALL. THIS CONNECTOR IS |
| | TO BE EMBEDDED IN THE CONCRETE. ALSO, IS NOT CLEAR HOW |
| | THE SIMPSON THGW4-4 IS INSTALLED. LOOK AT THE |
| | DIMENSIONS OF THIS CONNECTOR. ALSO, ANCHOR SCHEDULE |
| | LOCATION SPECIFIES CMU WALL TO (2)2X12. WHAT'S THIS. IS |
| | THERE A LEDGER. HOW IS THE LEDGER ATTACHED TO THE |
| | WALL?. PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAIL AND SPECIFICATIONS |
| | SHOWING HOW THESE CONNECTORS ARE INSTALLED. SEC. |
| | 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 2B)PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS ANS SPECIFICATION SHOWING |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH THE ATTIC CROSS VENTILATION AS REQUIRED |
| | BY SEC. 1203.2 |
| | FBC. |
| | |
| | 2C) PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE |
| | FINISHED CEILING AND WALLS IN THIS CORRIDOR. SEC. |
| | 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 2D) SPECIFY HEADROOM. SEC. 1208.2 FBC |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 3- PICTURES TAKEN ON LINE FROM THE DANIEL ART WORLD |
| | GALLERY SHOW NEW STOREFRONT SYSTEM, DOORS SIDELIGHTS, |
| | MULLIONS AND TRANSOM INSTALLED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF |
| | PERMIT. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | DETAIL A-5 ON SHEET A-4: |
| | 3A) ANCHOR SCHEDULE DOESN'T SHOW ANY A2 CONNECTOR. SEC. |
| | 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 3B) SPECIFY NUMBER OF STUCCO COATS AND THICKNESS AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. 2511.1 FBC. (THREE COATS AND 7/8" |
| | TOTAL THICKNESS). |
| | |
| | 3C) SPECIFY DOUBLE LAYER OF WATER RESISTIVE BARRIER AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. 2510.6 FBC. |
| | |
| | 3D) LETTERING IN EXTERIOR WALL FRAMING DETAIL AND |
| | ANCHOR SCHEDULE IS NOT LEGIBLE. IT'S TOO SMALL. REVISE |
| | AS REQUIRED. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. NOTE: THERE |
| | ARE MANY DETAILS THAT HAVE VERY SMALL LETTERING AND ARE |
| | NOT LEGIBLE. PLEASE MAKE SURE THAT ALL DETAILS AND |
| | SPECIFICATIONS ON ALL PLANS HAVE LEGIBLE LETTERING TO |
| | AVOID UNNECESSARY DENIALS. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 4- 2ND REQUEST. THE COVERSHEET INDICATES THE OCCUPANT |
| | LOAD OF 378 AND SHEET A-1 SHOWS 4 EXITS AND 3 |
| | ACCESSIBLE EXIT. PLEASE REVIEW SECTION: |
| | 4 X 0.60= 2.4, REQUIRES 3 ACCESSIBLE EXITS THAT WILL |
| | MEET THE REMOTENESS REQUIREMENTS UNDER FBC-B 1015.2.1. |
| | |
| | 2014 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING CODE 1012.8 ACCESSIBILITY. |
| | EXISTING BUILDINGS THAT UNDERGO A CHANGE OF GROUP OR |
| | OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION SHALL COMPLY WITH THE |
| | PROVISIONS OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, ACCESSIBILITY. |
| | |
| | 2014 ACCESS. CODE 206.4.1 PUBLIC ENTRANCES. IN ADDITION |
| | TO ENTRANCES REQUIRED BY 206.4.2 THROUGH 206.4.9, AT |
| | LEAST 60 PERCENT OF ALL PUBLIC ENTRANCES SHALL COMPLY |
| | WITH 404. |
| | |
| | (GRAY BOX FLORIDA SPECIFIC). BARRIERS AT COMMON OR |
| | EMERGENCY ENTRANCES AND EXITS OF BUSINESS |
| | ESTABLISHMENTS CONDUCTING BUSINESS WITH THE GENERAL |
| | PUBLIC THAT ARE EXISTING, UNDER CONSTRUCTION, OR UNDER |
| | CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION WHICH WOULD PREVENT A PERSON |
| | FROM USING SUCH ENTRANCES OR EXITS SHALL BE REMOVED. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | 4A)INFORMATION ON THE COVER SHEET WAS REVISED. CLEARLY |
| | LABEL ON PLANS THE NEW STORAGE AREAS. THERE ARE MANY |
| | DISCREPANCIES ON THE SQUARE FOOTAGES. IT DOESN'T ADD UP |
| | TO THE SQUARE FOOTAGES SHOWN ON PLANS AND IT DOESN'T |
| | MATCH PROPERTY APPRAISER INFORMATION. ACCORDING TO |
| | PROJECT DATA ON TOP OF SHEET THE EXISTING BUILDING AREA |
| | IS 11,688 S.F. CLARIFY AS REQUIRED AND CLEARLY PROVIDE |
| | ON PLANS EACH SQUARE FOOTAGE AREA CONSIDERED FOR THE |
| | TOTAL OCCUPANT LOAD CALCULATION (DISPLAY AREA, STORAGE |
| | AREAS AND OFFICE AREA). SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 4B) IT'S NOT CLEAR HOW THE OFFICES ARE ACCESSIBLE FROM |
| | THE STREET IS THERE IS A 4" DROP A THE ENTRY. ARE ALL |
| | THE OFFICES AT THE SAME LEVEL. THIS DRAWING DOESN'T |
| | MATCH OTHER DRAWINGS. IS THE ENTRY DOOR GOING TO BE |
| | REPLACED?. IS THAT WHY CHANGING THE SWING OF THE DOOR?. |
| | SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. NOTE: DOOR MANEUVERING |
| | REQUIREMENTS MAY APPLY ALSO. SEC. 404.2.4 FBC |
| | ACCESSIBILITY. |
| | |
| | 4C) PROPOSED SECOND EGRESS DOORS ON THE NORTH END NEED |
| | MORE INFORMATION. NEED TO COORDINATE THE LINTEL |
| | INFORMATION AND NEED TO PROVIDE STRUCTURAL SUPPORT AT |
| | HE NEEDS OF THE PROPOSED OPENING. CONCRETE LINTEL CAN |
| | NOT BE SUPPORTED ON WOOD FRAME. REVISE/COORDINATE |
| | STRUCTURAL INFORMATION AS REQUIRED. PROVIDE COMPLETE |
| | FRAMING DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE NEW DOORS. |
| | SEC. 1601.1 FBC. |
| | |
| | 4D) NEW STORAGE AREAS (OLD LOADING AREAS). NOT CLEAR |
| | HOW THESE AREAS ARE ENCLOSED. SHEET A-2 SHOWS EXISTING |
| | ROLL UP DOORS TO REMAIN, BUT THE DOORS ARE NOT SHOWN ON |
| | THE OTHER PLANS. CLARIFY. SEC. 1074.2.1 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 4E) THE LIFE SAFETY PLAN ONLY SHOWS EXIT SIGNS ON ONE |
| | SIDE OF THE WALL DIVIDING THE NORTH AND SOUTH BUILDING. |
| | PROVIDE SIGN ON BOTH SIDES. SEC. 1011.1 FBC |
| | |
| | 4F) REVISE EXITING REQUIREMENT INFORMATION ON SHEET |
| | C-1. THE PROVIDED EXIT WIDTH IS NOT 144 INCHES. NEED TO |
| | CONSIDER THE CLEAR WIDTH OF THE DOORS NOT THE SIZE OF |
| | THE DOORS. SEE SEC. 1008.1.1 FBC FOR PROPER WAY OF |
| | DETERMINING THE CLEAR WIDTH OPENING OF THE DOOR AND |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 4G) THE SCALE SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN ON SHEET C-1 |
| | DOESN'T MATCH THE SCALE OF DRAWING. REVISE TO MATCH. |
| | SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 5- NOTICE ONLY!!!! PLEASE NOTE THE EGRESS DOOR THAT |
| | OPENS ONTO NORTH RAILROAD AVENUE IS AN EXISTING |
| | NON-CONFORMING DOORWAY THAT SWINGS OUT OVER THE PUBLIC |
| | SIDEWALK, NOTE IF THE DOOR IS NOT REPLACED IT DOES NOT |
| | NEED TO BE REPLACED, BUT WHEN THE DOOR AND JAMB ARE |
| | REPLACED IT WILL STILL NEED TO SWING OUT BUT RECESSED |
| | BACK IN AN ALCOVE. |
| | 2014 FBC-B 3202.2 ENCROACHMENTS ABOVE GRADE AND BELOW 8 |
| | FEET IN HEIGHT. ENCROACHMENTS INTO THE PUBLIC |
| | RIGHT-OF-WAY ABOVE GRADE AND BELOW 8 FEET (2438 MM) IN |
| | HEIGHT SHALL BE PROHIBITED EXCEPT AS PROVIDED FOR IN |
| | SECTIONS 3202.2.1 THROUGH 3202.2.3. DOORS AND WINDOWS |
| | SHALL NOT OPEN OR PROJECT INTO THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. |
| | |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT #12: |
| | 12- 2ND REQUEST. SHEET A4 DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE |
| | HANDRAIL NOR GUARDRAIL REQUIREMENTS. 2014 FBC-B |
| | 1607.8.1 HANDRAILS AND GUARDS. |
| | HANDRAILS AND GUARDS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO RESIST A |
| | LINEAR LOAD OF 50 POUNDS PER LINEAR FOOT (PLF) IN |
| | ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 4.5.1 OF ASCE 7. GLASS HANDRAIL |
| | ASSEMBLIES AND GUARDS SHALL ALSO COMPLY WITH SECTION |
| | 2407. |
| | |
| | 12A) 2014 FBC-B 1607.8.1.1 CONCENTRATED LOAD. HANDRAILS |
| | AND GUARDS SHALL ALSO BE DESIGNED TO RESIST A |
| | CONCENTRATED LOAD OF 200 POUNDS IN ACCORDANCE WITH |
| | SECTION 4.5.1 OF ASCE 7. |
| | |
| | 12B) 2014 FBC-B 1607.8.1.2 INTERMEDIATE RAILS. |
| | INTERMEDIATE RAILS (ALL THOSE EXCEPT THE HANDRAIL), |
| | BALUSTERS AND PANEL FILLERS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO RESIST |
| | A CONCENTRATED LOAD OF 50 POUNDS IN ACCORDANCE WITH |
| | SECTION 4.5.1 OF ASCE 7. |
| | |
| | 12C) PLEASE DO NOT RESTATE THE CODE, BUT PROVIDE |
| | CALCULATIONS. 107.2.1 INFORMATION ON CONSTRUCTION |
| | DOCUMENTS. SUCH INFORMATION SHALL BE SPECIFIC, AND THE |
| | TECHNICAL CODES SHALL NOT BE CITED AS A WHOLE OR IN |
| | PART, NOR SHALL THE TERM "LEGAL" OR ITS EQUIVALENT BE |
| | USED AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR SPECIFIC INFORMATION. ALL |
| | INFORMATION, DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ACCOMPANYING |
| | DATA SHALL BEAR THE NAME AND SIGNATURE OF THE PERSON |
| | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DESIGN. (SEE ALSO SECTION 107.3.5). |
| | |
| | 12D) SHEETS A1 AND A2 DOES NOT SHOW A HANDRAIL FOR ANY |
| | OF THE EXISTING STAIRS OR FOR THE EXISTING (PROPOSED) |
| | STAIRS. 805.9 HANDRAILS. EXISTING BUILDING CODE. THE |
| | REQUIREMENTS OF SECTIONS EXIST. BUILD. CODE. 805.9.1 |
| | AND 805.9.2 SHALL APPLY TO HANDRAILS FROM THE WORK AREA |
| | FLOOR TO, AND INCLUDING, THE LEVEL OF EXIT DISCHARGE. |
| | |
| | 12D)(1)EXIST BUILD. CODE 805.9.1 MINIMUM REQUIREMENT. |
| | EVERY REQUIRED EXIT STAIRWAY THAT IS PART OF THE MEANS |
| | OF EGRESS FOR ANY WORK AREA AND THAT HAS THREE OR MORE |
| | RISERS AND IS NOT PROVIDED WITH AT LEAST ONE HANDRAIL, |
| | OR IN WHICH THE EXISTING HANDRAILS ARE JUDGED TO BE IN |
| | DANGER OF COLLAPSING, SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH HANDRAILS |
| | FOR THE FULL LENGTH OF THE RUN OF STEPS ON AT LEAST ONE |
| | SIDE. ALL EXIT STAIRWAYS WITH A REQUIRED EGRESS WIDTH |
| | OF MORE THAN 66 INCHES (1676 MM) SHALL HAVE HANDRAILS |
| | ON BOTH SIDES. |
| | |
| | 12D)(2) EXISTING BUILD. CODE 805.9.2 DESIGN. HANDRAILS |
| | REQUIRED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 805.9.1 SHALL BE |
| | DESIGNED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE |
| | PROVISIONS OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 12E) GUARDRAILS SHALL BE 42 INCHES HIGH. 1013.3 HEIGHT. |
| | |
| | 12F) HANDRAILS ON STAIRS NEEDS TO COMPLY WITH 2014 |
| | FBC-B WHERE HANDRAILS ARE NOT CONTINUOUS BETWEEN |
| | FLIGHTS, THE HANDRAILS SHALL EXTEND HORIZONTALLY AT |
| | LEAST 12 INCHES (305 MM) BEYOND THE TOP RISER AND |
| | CONTINUE TO SLOPE FOR THE DEPTH OF ONE TREAD BEYOND THE |
| | BOTTOM RISER. |
| | |
| | 12G) SHEET A4 THERE IS A DETAIL OF AN ACCESSIBLE RAMP, |
| | MISSING INFORMATION INCLUDES STEEL RE-INFORCEMENT |
| | NEEDED FOR THE FOUNDATION AND UPRIGHT RETAINING WALL |
| | RE-INFORCEMENT AS WELL SIZE OF THE RE-BARS AND |
| | FREQUENCY IN PLACEMENT. 1-7.2.1.3 ADDITIONAL |
| | INFORMATION REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 12H) SHEET A4 THERE IS A DETAIL OF AN ACCESSIBLE RAMP |
| | THERE IS NO DIMENSION AS TO THE WIDTH OF THE ACCESSIBLE |
| | RAMP, 2014 FBC-B 1010.6.1 WIDTH. THE MINIMUM WIDTH OF A |
| | MEANS OF EGRESS RAMP SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN THAT |
| | REQUIRED FOR CORRIDORS BY SECTION 1018.2. |
| | |
| | 12I) 2014 FBC-B 1010.4 CROSS SLOPE. THE SLOPE MEASURED |
| | PERPENDICULAR TO THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL OF A RAMP |
| | SHALL NOT BE STEEPER THAN ONE UNIT VERTICAL IN 48 UNITS |
| | HORIZONTAL (2-PERCENT SLOPE). |
| | |
| | 12J) 2014 FBC-B 1010.5 VERTICAL RISE. THE RISE FOR ANY |
| | RAMP RUN SHALL BE 30 INCHES (762 MM) MAXIMUM. A |
| | MID-LANDING WILL BE REQUIRED, PLEASE INDICATE THE |
| | MID-LANDING THE LANDING LENGTH SHALL BE 60 INCHES |
| | MINIMUM FBC-B 1010.7.3. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | SAME COMMENTS APPLY. THERE WERE NO REVISION DONE ON |
| | THIS SHEET ADDRESSING THESE COMMENTS. ALSO. PLEASE MAKE |
| | SURE ALL LETTERING IS LEGIBLE. THERE ARE MANY DETAILS |
| | WITH THE LETTERING TOO SMALL AND ARE NOT LEGIBLE. |
| | NOTE: ALSO, NEED TO PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION ABOUT |
| | THE EXISTING STAIRS ON THE SOUTH SIDE TO BE USED FOR |
| | MAIN ENTRANCE AND EGRESS. SPECIFY RAILING, RISERS, |
| | TREADS, PROVIDE ALL DIMENSIONS TO VERIFY EGRESS |
| | COMPLIANCE. |
| | IN ADDITION, PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION FOR RAMP EDGE |
| | PROTECTION. SEC. 1010.10 FBC. |
| | |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT #13: |
| | 13) THE PERMIT VALUE IS VERY LOW FOR THE WORK SHOWN ON |
| | THE PLANS AS WELL AS THE WORK THAT WAS DONE WITHOUT A |
| | PERMIT. |
| | |
| | 108.3* BUILDING PERMIT VALUATION. IF, IN THE OPINION OF |
| | THE BUILDING OFFICIAL, THE CLAIMED VALUATION OF |
| | BUILDING, ALTERATION, STRUCTURE, ELECTRICAL, GAS, |
| | MECHANICAL, OR PLUMBING SYSTEMS APPEARS TO BE UNDER |
| | ESTIMATED ON THE APPLICATION, THE PERMIT SHALL BE |
| | DENIED. FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES, VALUATION OF BUILDINGS |
| | AND SYSTEMS SHALL BE TOTAL REPLACEMENT PURPOSES, |
| | VALUATION OF BUILDINGS AND SYSTEMS SHALL BE THE TOTAL |
| | REPLACEMENT VALUE TO INCLUDE STRUCTURAL, ELECTRICAL, |
| | PLUMBING, MECHANICAL, INTERIOR FINISHES, NORMAL SITE |
| | WORK (EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL FOR BUILDINGS), |
| | ARCHITECTURAL AND DESIGN FEES, MARKETING COST, OVERHEAD |
| | AND PROFIT; EXCLUDING ONLY LAND VALUE. VALUATION |
| | REFERENCES MAY INCLUDE THE LATEST PUBLISHED DATA OF |
| | NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION COST ANALYSIS SERVICES |
| | (MARSHALL-SWIFT, MEANS, ETC.) WITH REGIONAL ADJUSTMENTS |
| | FOR LOCATION AS PUBLISHED BY THE INTERNATIONAL CODE |
| | CONGRESS. |
| | |
| | THIS MAIN BUILDING PERMIT WILL INCLUDE THE FEES FOR THE |
| | MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING & ROOFING PERMITS. |
| | WHEN THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR COMES IN FOR A BUILDING |
| | PERMIT WITH THE SIGNED PERMIT APPLICATION FORM BY THE |
| | QUALIFIER AND OWNER AND BRINGS IN THE LISTED |
| | SUB-PERMITS M-E-P & ROOFING PERMITS SIGNED BY THE |
| | QUALIFIER OF EACH COMPANY, THEIR INSURANCES AND |
| | LICENSURE UP TO DATE, THE M-E-P AND ROOFING PERMITS ARE |
| | FREE OF CHARGE. IF THE M-E-P & ROOFING PERMITS COME IN |
| | LATER THERE WILL BE AN $80.00 ADMINISTRATIVE FEE FOR |
| | EACH PERMIT. |
| | |
| | ALL OTHER PERMITS FIRE SPRINKLER, FIRE ALARM, RACK |
| | STORAGE, EXHAUST HOODS, ANSUL SYSTEMS OR ALTERNATIVE |
| | AUTOMATIC FIRE-EXTINGUISHING SYSTEMS, WALK IN COOLERS & |
| | FREEZERS, ALL LOW VOLTAGE PERMITS, GENERATORS & FUEL |
| | TANKS, GAS PERMIT, POOL, JACUZZI AND ASSOCIATED |
| | SUB-PERMITS, AWNING, SCREEN ENCLOSURES, CANOPY, FENCE, |
| | LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, AUGER CAST PILE AND OR |
| | FOUNDATION OR STRUCTURE ONLY PERMIT WILL BE SEPARATE |
| | REVIEWS AND ASSOCIATED FEES WITH EACH PERMIT. |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE AN ITEMIZED LIST AND SUBTRACT THESE LINE |
| | ITEMS AND THEIR VALUE FROM THE OVERALL BUILDING VALUE |
| | STATED ON THE PERMIT APPLICATION FOR THIS PROJECT. THE |
| | REMAINING BALANCE WILL BE AFFECTIVELY THE VALUE OF THE |
| | BUILDING YOU WILL BE PAYING FOR THIS PERMIT. THE |
| | BUILDING DEPARTMENT DOES NOT WANT TO COLLECT TWICE FOR |
| | THE VALUE OF THESE SUB-PERMITS NOT COVERED UNDER THE |
| | PRIME OR MASTER PERMIT. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | SAME COMMENTS APPLY. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT#14A: |
| | 14A) SHEET A4 UNDER THE WIND DESIGN LIST 3 REFERENCES |
| | TO THE 2014 RESIDENTIAL CODE R616.4, R703.1.3 AND TABLE |
| | R301.2(2), THESE ARE ALL TO BE USED WITH SINGLE FAMILY |
| | DWELLINGS, NOT TO BE USED WITH THE COMMERCIAL CODE, |
| | FBC-BUILDING CODE, SEE CHAPTER 1609. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | SAME COMMENT APPLIES. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT#14B: |
| | 14B) SUBMIT PRODUCT APPROVALS: 2014 FBC-B 1609.1.2 |
| | PROTECTION OF OPENINGS, 1609.6.4.4.1 COMPONENTS & |
| | CLADDING. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS, |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 61G20-3.005, RULE 9N-3 NOV. 01/ |
| | 2010 (31) SUB-CATEGORY OF PRODUCTS OR CONSTRUCTION |
| | SYSTEMS THAT WILL REQUIRE PRODUCT APPROVALS: |
| | (31)(A) EXTERIOR DOORS ,MULLIONS & ROOF HATCHES. |
| | (B) WINDOWS & MULLIONS |
| | (C) PANEL WALLS: STOREFRONTS, CURTAIN WALLS, WALL |
| | LOUVERS, EFIS SYSTEMS, |
| | (D) ROOFING PRODUCTS AND ASSEMBLIES, ROOF TOP |
| | VENTILATORS |
| | (G) PRE-ENGINEERED A/C STANDS |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | SAME COMMENT APPLIES. NOTE: THIS MAY BE SUBMITTED LATER |
| | AS A DEFERRED SUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT#14D: |
| | 14D) SHEET A4 THE ACCESSIBLE THRESHOLD NEEDS TO COMPLY |
| | WITH: THRESHOLDS ACCESS. CODE 404.2.5. THRESHOLDS, IF |
| | PROVIDED AT DOORWAYS, SHALL BE 1/2 INCH (13 MM) HIGH |
| | MAXIMUM. RAISED THRESHOLDS AND CHANGES IN LEVEL AT |
| | DOORWAYS SHALL COMPLY WITH 302 AND 303. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | SAME COMMENT APPLIES. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT#14E: |
| | 14E) W. P. B. 107.3.4.1 PRODUCT APPROVALS. THOSE |
| | PRODUCTS WHICH ARE REGULATED BY THE DCA RULE 9N-03 |
| | SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE |
| | DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR |
| | JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. FL 61G1-23.015 (2) THE |
| | ARCHITECT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SUPERVISING AND REVIEWING |
| | ALL PROJECT DATA, REPORTS, SHOP DRAWINGS ETC.. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | SAME COMMENT APPLIES. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT#15: |
| | 15) BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT, MAY BE ISSUED, IMPACT |
| | FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM BEACH COUNTY. ONE SET OF |
| | PLANS WILL HAVE TO BE TAKEN (BY THE CONTRACTOR OR |
| | REPRESENTATIVE) TO THE PALM BEACH COUNTY IMPACT FEE |
| | OFFICE LOCATED AT 2300 N. JOG RD. ROOMS 2W01-2W14 WEST |
| | PALM BEACH, FL. THE ACTUAL PERMIT SET OF PLANS MUST BE |
| | STAMPED BY THAT OFFICE, AND A COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT |
| | ATTACHED TO THE PERMIT APPLICATION. PLEASE CALL |
| | (561)233-5025 FOR MORE INFORMATION. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT#16: |
| | 16) WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE |
| | REVISION & REMOVE ANY VOIDED SHEETS & REPLACE ANY PAGES |
| | AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL |
| | REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE |
| | REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION |
| | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO |
| | EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED |
| | COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | A TRANSMITTAL LETTER WAS NOT SUBMITTED THIS TIME. PLAN |
| | REVIEW TAKES MORE TIME WHEN TRANSMITTAL LETTER IS NOT |
| | SUBMITTED. IT'S HARD TO KNOW WHICH ITEMS WERE ADDRESSED |
| | OR NOT. PLEASE PROVIDE R TRANSMITTAL LETTER TO HELP |
| | EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. |
| | |
| | A THOROUGH REVIEW CANNOT BE MADE AT THIS TIME, AS A |
| | RESULT OF THE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY APPEAR THAT WERE NOT PART OF |
| | THIS REVIEW. |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
