Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Permit 17110788
Permit Number 17110788
Review Stop Z
Sequence Number 1
Notes
Date Text
2017-12-14 16:00:321) THE STANDARD PARKING STALL DETAILS ON THE PLANS DO
 NOT COMPLY WITH THE CITY'S PARKING STALL STANDARDS?
 DIMENSIONS OR STRIPING REQUIREMENTS IN THE ZONING CODE
 OR WITH THE PARKING STALL DETAILS IN THE APPROVED SITE
 PLAN.
  
 2) SHEET SP-2 IN THE SUBMITTAL INCLUDES SEVERAL PARKING
 STRIPING AND BIKE RACK DETAILS WHICH WERE NOT PART OF
 THE APPROVED SITE PLAN AND WHICH DO NOT COMPLY WITH
 CITY STANDARDS.
  
 3) THE BIKE RACK PLAN VIEW SHOWN ON SHEET C12 HAS
 MINIMUM DIMENSIONS OF 12" BETWEEN THE RACKS AND THE
 EDGE OF THE PAD. THESE DIMENSIONS DO NOT COMPLY WITH
 MINIMUM BIKE RACK PAD DIMENSIONS INCLUDED IN APPROVED
 SITE PLAN.
  
 4) THE DIMENSIONS FOR THE PARALLEL PARKING SPACES
 IDENTIFIED ON THE BUILDING PLANS ARE DIFFERENT FROM
 THOSE IN THE APPROVED SITE PLAN. THE WIDTHS OF THE
 PARALLEL SPACES ON THE BUILDING PLANS ARE OF 8.5 FEET
 AND 10 FEET COMPARED TO 8 FEET ON THE SITE PLAN. THE
 APPLICANT NEEDS TO PROVIDE AN EXPLANATION OF HOW THIS
 ADDITIONAL SPACE ON THE PARKING SPACES IMPACTS OTHER
 COMPONENTS OF THE PLAN. THIS EXPLANATION SHOULD INCLUDE
 AN EAST-WEST CROSS SECTION OF THE SITE IN THE AREA
 AROUND BUILDINGS 2 AND 5 THAT COMPARES DIMENSIONS
 BETWEEN THE PROPOSED BUILDING PLAN AND THE APPROVED
 SITE PLAN.
  
 5) THE BIKE RACK DEPICTED ON THE SITE PLAN ON THE NE
 SIDE OF THE PUPPY PARK IS NOT SHOWN ON THE PAVING AND
 STRIPING PLAN INCLUDED IN THIS SUBMITTAL.
  
 6) PLEASE VERIFY THAT THE NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES ON
 THE PLANS ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE PARKING SPACES ON THE
 SITE PLAN. STAFF NOTED SOME INCONSISTENCIES BETWEEN THE
 NUMBER OF SPACES ON SECTIONS OF BOTH PLANS. FOR
 EXAMPLE, THE PAVING AND STRIPING PLAN DEPICTS FIVE (5)
 PARALLEL PARKING SPACES ON THE SE AREA OF THE SITE TO
 THE EAST OF BUILDING 3 WHILE THE SITE PLAN SHOWS SIX
 (6) PARALLEL SPACES ON THIS AREA. IN ADDITION, THE
 PAVING AND STRIPING PLAN SHOWS SIX (6) SPACES ON THE
 ROW LOCATED ON THE SW CORNER OF THE SITE WHILE THE SITE
 PLAN SHOWS FIVE (5) SPACES FOR THIS SAME PARKING ROW.
 SIMILAR TO THE COMMENT ABOVE, THE APPLICANT NEEDS TO
 EXPLAIN HOW THESE DISCREPANCIES IN THE PARKING AREAS
 IMPACT OTHER COMPONENTS OF THE PLAN.
  
 7) THE APPROVAL LETTER FOR THE BELLA VITA MINOR SITE
 PLAN AMENDMENT ISSUED ON OCTOBER 26, 2017 INCLUDES THE
 FOLLOWING CONDITION OF APPROVAL:
 "5. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE FIRST BUILDING PERMIT
 FOR THE PROJECT, THE LANDSCAPE PLAN, SITE PLAN, AND
 ENGINEERING PAVING AND DRAINAGE PLANS SHALL BE REVISED
 TO RELOCATE THE CURBS TO THE POSITION OF THE WHEEL
 STOPS AND PROVIDE A LANDSCAPED OVERHANG WHERE POSSIBLE
 WITHIN THE PARKING AREAS TO PROVIDE MORE PERVIOUS
 LANDSCAPE AREA. THE DESIGN SHALL FOLLOW THE TYPICAL
 PARKING STALL LAYOUT AS SHOWN ON THE APPROVED PLANS. A
 MINOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT WILL BE REQUIRED TO
 REFLECT ANY REVISIONS TO THE PLANS." SINCE NO REVISED
 SITE PLAN, LANDSCAPE PLAN, AND ENGINEERING PAVING AND
 DRAINAGE PLANS CONSISTENT WITH THE ABOVE CONDITION HAVE
 BEEN SUBMITTED, THE BUILDING PLANS INCLUDED IN THIS
 PERMIT CANNOT BE APPROVED.
  
  


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved