Date |
Text |
2017-10-24 17:40:39 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) RE-ROOF FOURTH BUILDING REVIEW |
| CHECKLIST. |
| CODE: FBC 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| |
| 1- ENGINEER TO REVISE RAS 117 CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED: |
| A) CALCULATIONS ARE NOT CLEAR AND SEEM TO BE INCORRECT. |
| CLARIFY WHY THE # OF ROWS HAVING SPACING A IS "0". I |
| THINK THIS SHOULD BE 1. SINCE CALCULATIONS ARE NOT |
| CLEAR, I ASSUME THIS IS THE SIDE LAP. REVISE AS |
| REQUIRED. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| NOTE: CALCULATIONS ARE NOT CLEAR, THE LETTERS "A" AND |
| "C" ARE REPEATED BUT THEY SEEM TO APPLY FOR DIFFERENT |
| THINGS. I AM JUST ASSUMING ONE A IS FOR FASTENER |
| SPACING IN THE LAP AND THE OTHER A IS FOR FASTENER |
| SPACING IN THE CENTER ROWS. AND, ONE C IS FOR THE |
| NUMBER OF ROWS HAVING SPACING A IN THE SIDE LAP AND THE |
| OTHER C IS FOR # OF ROWS HAVING SPACING A IN THE CENTER |
| ROWS. |
| |
| B) NUMBER OF ROWS AND SPACING SPECIFIED FOR THE CORNER |
| AREAS SEEM TO BE INCORRECT. WE USE A SPREAD SHEET TO |
| VERIFY RAS 117 CALCULATIONS WHEN WE THINK THERE IS |
| SOMETHING THAT IS NOT CLEAR. BASED ON THE DESIGN |
| PRESSURES AND INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM THE NOA |
| SUBMITTED IT LOOKS LIKE CORNER ZONES WILL REQUIRE AT |
| LEAST FOUR ROWS OF FASTENER IN THE CENTER OF THE SHEET |
| AND NOT 3 AS SPECIFIED BY THE ENGINEER ( FASTENER |
| SPACING CAN NOT BE LESS THAN 4" O.C. AS REQUIRED BY RAS |
| 117 SEC. 8.1). ENCLOSED SEE THE RAS 117 CALCULATIONS |
| THAT I RUN FOR THIS PROJECT. ENGINEER TO REVISE AS |
| REQUIRED OR PROVIDE COMPLETE RAS 117 CALCULATIONS |
| SHOWING THAT OUR SAMPLE IS INCORRECT. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY |
| AMENDMENTS. |
| |
| NOTE: AS REQUIRED BY FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B) |
| ENGINEER MAY BE CHARGED FOUR TIMES THE PLAN REVIEW FEES |
| FOR MULTIPLE REJECTIONS. |
| |
| IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT |
| JULIO GOMEZ |
| COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| BUILDING DIVISION |
| (561)805-6712 |
| [email protected] |