Date |
Text |
2018-01-05 17:20:27 | REVIEW COMMENTS |
| |
| 1ST REVIEW: FBC FIFTH EDITION (2014) |
| ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO |
| COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| (561) 805-6714 |
| [email protected] |
| |
| DENIED BY BUILDING |
| PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW: |
| |
| 1) THIS STRUCTURE IS LOCATED IN A SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD |
| AREA (SFHA). THE BASE FLOOD ELEVATION (BFE) IS 7' NGVD |
| '29. THE PERMIT APPLICATION DATE IS AUGUST 29, 2017. |
| THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH FLOOD ORDINANCE THAT WAS IN |
| EFFECT AT THAT TIME HAS A 1 FOOT FREEBOARD THAT |
| REQUIRES THE FINISH FLOOR AND EQUIPMENT TO BE A MINIMUM |
| OF ONE FOOT (1') ABOVE THE BFE. THE PLANS SPECIFY A |
| FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION OF 8' NGVD WHICH COMPLIES WITH |
| THE FLOOD ORDINANCE IN EFFECT AT THE TIME OF |
| APPLICATION. NOTE: ELEVATION CERTIFICATES WILL BE |
| REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED DURING AND AFTER CONSTRUCTION. |
| |
| 2) WALL SECTIONS B AND C ON SHEET A.07 DO NOT MATCH THE |
| STRUCTURAL PLANS FOR THE LOGGIA COLUMNS AND BEAMS. THE |
| ARCHITECTURAL PLANS SHOW WOOD WRAPPED METAL COLUMNS AND |
| PSL WOOD BEAMS. THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS HAVE REINFORCED |
| MASONRY COLUMNS AND CONCRETE BEAMS. PLEASE COORDINATE |
| THE DRAWINGS. FBC107.2.1 |
| |
| 3) FBC 107.3.4 - PROVIDE TWO SETS OF PRODUCT APPROVALS |
| FOR THOSE PRODUCTS WHICH ARE REGULATED BY FAC |
| 61G20-3.001 PER FLORIDA STATUTE 553.842 (5) THAT HAVE |
| BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER |
| OF RECORD. ALL OF THE PRODUCT APPROVALS THAT WERE |
| SUBMITTED ARE REQUIRED TO BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN |
| WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD. ALL OF THE NOA OR FL |
| NUMBERS CAN BE LISTED ON THE PLANS OR ON THE DESIGNER'S |
| LETTERHEAD AND SIGNED AND SEALED. |
| |
| 4) THE SLIDING GLASS DOOR PRODUCT APPROVAL (NOA |
| NO.17-0420.14) IS ONLY RATED FOR SMALL MISSILE IMPACT. |
| ALL GLAZED OPENINGS ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE LARGE MISSILE |
| IMPACT PROTECTION PER FBC-R301.2.1.2. SUBMIT TWO SETS |
| OF PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR SLIDING GLASS DOORS WITH A |
| LARGE MISSILE IMPACT RATING OR PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR |
| LARGE MISSILE IMPACT PROTECTION RATED STORM PANELS |
| ALONG WITH A KEY PLAN AND INSTALLATION SCHEDULE. |
| |
| 5) THE MODIFIED BITUMEN ROOF SYSTEM THAT WAS SUBMITTED |
| (FL5680-R15) HAS A MAXIMUM DESIGN PRESSURE OF -60 PSF. |
| THIS IS NOT ADEQUATE FOR THE PERIMETER AND CORNER AREAS |
| OF THIS STRUCTURE. THIS STRUCTURE IS LOCATED IN |
| EXPOSURE "D" WITH A 170 MPH VULT WINDSPEED, HAS A 5/12 |
| ROOF SLOPE AND HAS A MEAN ROOF HEIGHT OF 26'-9". SUBMIT |
| TWO SETS OF SIGNED AND SEALED ENHANCED FASTENING |
| CALCULATIONS FOR THE BASE SHEET. FBC-R 301.2.1 THE RAS |
| 117 CALCULATIONS THAT WERE SUBMITTED ARE NOT |
| ACCEPTABLE. 1) THE CALCULATIONS ARE NOT SIGNED AND |
| SEALED. 2) THE PAGE NUMBER ON THE CALCULATIONS DOES NOT |
| MATCH THE PAGE FROM THE PRODUCT APPROVAL THAT WAS |
| MARKED AND SUBMITTED. 3) THE FASTENER SPACING SPECIFIED |
| ON THE RAS CALCULATIONS FOR THE CORNERS IS LESS THAN 4" |
| O.C., FBC TEST PROTOCOLS FOR RAS 117 SECTION 8.1 STATES |
| THAT THE MINIMUM FASTENER SEPARATION SHALL NOT BE LESS |
| THAN 4" O.C. |
| |
| 6) SUBMIT A COPY OF THE PAID PBC IMPACT FEE RECEIPT. |
| SEE IMPACT FEE REVIEW STOP. |
| |
| 7) IN ORDER TO REDUCE PLAN REVIEW TIME, PLEASE SUBMIT A |
| RESPONSE LETTER INDICATING HOW EACH OF THE REVIEW |
| COMMENTS HAS BEEN ADDRESSED. |
| |
| |
| |