Date |
Text |
2017-11-21 11:28:23 | 2014 FBC- BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| W. P. B. PERMIT: 17081207 |
| ADD: 300 CLEMATIS ST. 1ST FLOOR LEVEL |
| CONT: TBD/ TO BE DETERMINED |
| TEL: 954-709-4638 / CLAUDIA GILL # 954 |
| E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| |
| 2014 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE W 2014 WEST PALM BEACH |
| AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, CHAPTER 1, |
| ADMINISTRATION |
| |
| 2014 EXISTING BUILDING CODE LEVEL II 701.3 COMPLIANCE. |
| ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS, COMPONENTS, SYSTEMS, AND |
| SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE |
| FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING. |
| |
| 2ND REVIEW |
| DATE: TUES. NOV. 21/ 2017 |
| ACTION: DENIED |
| |
| WARNING!!!!! 4X FEE / NOTICE!!!!! FLORIDA STATUTE |
| 553.80(2)(B) |
| WITH RESPECT TO EVALUATION OF DESIGN PROFESSIONALS? |
| DOCUMENTS, IF A LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINDS IT NECESSARY, IN |
| ORDER TO ENFORCE COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA BUILDING |
| CODE AND ISSUE A PERMIT, TO REJECT DESIGN DOCUMENTS |
| REQUIRED BY THE CODE THREE OR MORE TIMES FOR FAILURE TO |
| CORRECT A CODE VIOLATION SPECIFICALLY AND CONTINUOUSLY |
| NOTED IN EACH REJECTION, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, |
| EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION, STRUCTURAL STABILITY, ENERGY, |
| ACCESSIBILITY, LIGHTING, VENTILATION, ELECTRICAL, |
| MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, AND GAS SYSTEMS, OR OTHER |
| REQUIREMENTS IDENTIFIED BY RULE OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING |
| COMMISSION ADOPTED PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 120, THE LOCAL |
| GOVERNMENT SHALL IMPOSE, EACH TIME AFTER THE THIRD SUCH |
| REVIEW THE PLANS ARE REJECTED FOR THAT CODE VIOLATION, |
| A FEE OF FOUR TIMES THE AMOUNT OF THE PROPORTION OF THE |
| PERMIT FEE ATTRIBUTED TO PLANS REVIEW. |
| |
| |
| 1) SHEET A0.1: |
| 1A) COMPLIED. OCCUPANCY. |
| |
| 1B)SEMI-COMPLIED. THE DESIGNER OF RECORD HAS ON SHEETS |
| A0.1, A1.5 & A2.0 PROVIDED (2) OPTIONS OF HOW CODE |
| COMPLIANCE IS TO BE MADE FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION |
| 1012.1.1.2 OF THE EXISTING BUILDING CODE AND THE FBC-B |
| SECTION 707.3.10 & TABLE 707.3.10 AND REQUIRED 2 HOUR |
| ASSEMBLY. |
| PLEASE PROVIDE THE MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS AS TO |
| HOW THIS SYSTEM WILL MAINTAIN A 2 HOUR FIRE RATING. THE |
| MANUFACTURE WILL NEED TO SUPPLY IF THE FLOOR JOIST SIZE |
| IS A CONCERN, SUB-FLOOR DECKING, AND AT WHAT RATE OF |
| APPLICATION. THE CENTER SECTION OF THE BUILDING WHERE |
| THERE WAS A MEZZANINE OPENING, THE INFILL IS STEEL AND |
| METAL DECKING, A SECOND ANALYSIS WILL NEED TO BE |
| COMPLETED FOR THIS FLOOR ASSEMBLY FOR A 2 HOUR FIRE |
| RATING. |
| THE OTHER ISSUE IS HOW ARE THE FLOOR JOIST BEARING? |
| WHAT TYPE OF SUPPORT IS PROVIDED THAT WILL GIVE THEM A |
| 2 HOUR FIRE RATING. IS THERE WOOD FRAME WALLS |
| SUPPORTING THE FLOOR JOIST OR ARE THE EXTERIOR WALLS |
| MASONRY OR TERRA COTTA TILE? 107.2.1.3. ADDITIONAL |
| INFORMATION IS REQUIRED. |
| |
| 2) SHEET A1.5 EGRESS PLAN. |
| |
| 2A) 2ND REQUEST. RESPONSE INDICATES A SURVEY WAS |
| PROVIDED IN THE RESUBMITTED PLANS. |
| 1ST ROUND OF COMMENTS. SHEET A1.5 INDICATES THE MAIN |
| DOUBLE EXIT DOORS (CLEMATIS SIDE) TO SWING OUT WHICH IS |
| REQUIRED BY CODE WHEN THERE IS AN OCCUPANT LOAD OF 50 |
| OR MORE FBC-B 1008.1.2. THE UNKNOWN IS WHERE THE |
| PROPERTY LINE IS LOCATED; NO SURVEY WAS SUBMITTED |
| ESTABLISHING THE LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY LINE. PLEASE |
| PROVIDE COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 3202.2. |
| FBC-B 3202.2. ENCROACHMENTS ABOVE GRADE AND BELOW 8 |
| FEET IN HEIGHT. ENCROACHMENTS INTO THE PUBLIC |
| RIGHT-OF-WAY ABOVE GRADE AND BELOW 8 FEET (2438 MM) IN |
| HEIGHT SHALL BE PROHIBITED EXCEPT AS PROVIDED FOR IN |
| SECTIONS 3202.2.1 THROUGH 3202.2.3. DOORS AND WINDOWS |
| SHALL NOT OPEN OR PROJECT INTO THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. |
| |
| 2B) 2ND REQUEST. ACCESSIBILITY. EXISTING BUILDING CODE |
| 1012.1.4 ALL BUILDINGS UNDERGOING A CHANGE IN OCCUPANCY |
| CLASSIFICATION SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTION 1012.8. |
| 1012.8. ACCESSIBILITY. EXISTING BUILDINGS THAT UNDERGO |
| A CHANGE IN OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION SHALL COMPLY WITH |
| THE PROVISIONS OF THE FBC-ACCESSIBILITY. |
| |
| THE PERMIT APPLICATION INDICATES A VALUE OF #125,000.00 |
| DOLLARS. PLEASE PROVIDE A COST ESTIMATE ON LETTERHEAD |
| WHERE UP TO 0.20 % OF THE CONTRACT VALUE OR $25,000.00 |
| DOLLARS CAN BE SPENT IN ACCESSIBLE UPGRADES. SECTION |
| 202.4.2 ACCESSIBLE FEATURES IN THE EVENT OF |
| DISPROPORTIONALITY PROVIDES A LIST OF ELEMENTS AND IN |
| WHAT ORDER THEY ARE GIVEN. IF DISPROPORTIONALITY OCCURS |
| BEFORE THE LIST IS COMPLETED THEN, THAT IS ALL THAT IS |
| REQUIRED UNDER THE FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, THE |
| OWNERS AND TENANT STILL WOULD HAVE OBLIGATIONS UNDER |
| THE REMOVAL OF BARRIERS UNDER THE TITLE III OF THE ADA. |
| |
| 2014 FBC-ACCESSIBILITY CODE. 202.4.2 ACCESSIBLE |
| FEATURES IN THE EVENT OF DISPROPORTIONALITY. |
| WHEN THE COST OF ALTERATIONS NECESSARY TO MAKE THE PATH |
| OF TRAVEL TO THE ALTERED AREA FULLY ACCESSIBLE IS |
| DISPROPORTIONATE TO THE COST OF THE OVERALL ALTERATION, |
| THE PATH OF TRAVEL SHALL BE MADE ACCESSIBLE TO THE |
| EXTENT THAT IT CAN BE MADE ACCESSIBLE WITHOUT INCURRING |
| DISPROPORTIONATE COSTS. IN CHOOSING WHICH ACCESSIBLE |
| ELEMENTS TO PROVIDE, PRIORITY SHOULD BE GIVEN TO THOSE |
| ELEMENTS THAT WILL PROVIDE THE GREATEST ACCESS, IN THE |
| FOLLOWING ORDER: (I) AN ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE; (II) AN |
| ACCESSIBLE ROUTE TO THE ALTERED AREA; (III) AT LEAST |
| ONE ACCESSIBLE RESTROOM FOR EACH SEX OR A SINGLE UNISEX |
| RESTROOM; (IV) ACCESSIBLE TELEPHONES; (V) ACCESSIBLE |
| DRINKING FOUNTAINS; AND (VI) WHEN POSSIBLE, ADDITIONAL |
| ACCESSIBLE ELEMENTS SUCH AS PARKING, STORAGE, AND |
| ALARMS. |
| |
| 2C) 2ND REQUEST. THE RESPONSE LETTER INDICATES THAT THE |
| 20 % WAS SPENT ON THE ADA RESTROOMS. PLEASE REVIEW THE |
| ABOVE REQUEST. THE ACCESSIBILITY CODE IS QUITE CLEAR |
| WHERE THE FUNDS ARE TO BE SPENT; AN ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE |
| IS THE FIRST REQUIREMENT UNDER THE ACCESSIBILITY CODE. |
| THE RAMP ON THE OLIVE AVE. SIDE WOULD HAVE TO BE |
| VERIFIED IT MEETS THE 1:10 TO 1:12 SLOPE REQUIREMENT |
| FOR A RISE OF NO MORE THAN 6 INCHES. |
| THE FBC-B AND ACCESSIBILITY CODE BOTH REQUIRE 2 MEANS |
| OF EGRESS AND THE ACCESSIBILITY CODE ALSO WILL REQUIRE |
| 2 ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCES AND EXITS. 2014 |
| FBC-ACCESSIBILITY CODE. 206.4.1 PUBLIC ENTRANCES. |
| (DOORWAYS) IN ADDITION TO ENTRANCES REQUIRED BY 206.4.2 |
| THROUGH 206.4.9, AT LEAST 60 PERCENT OF ALL PUBLIC |
| ENTRANCES SHALL COMPLY WITH 404. BARRIERS AT COMMON OR |
| EMERGENCY ENTRANCES AND EXITS OF BUSINESS |
| ESTABLISHMENTS CONDUCTING BUSINESS WITH THE GENERAL |
| PUBLIC THAT ARE EXISTING, UNDER CONSTRUCTION, OR UNDER |
| CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION WHICH WOULD PREVENT A PERSON |
| FROM USING SUCH ENTRANCES OR EXITS SHALL BE REMOVED. 2 |
| X 0.6 = 1.2 OR 2 ROUND UP NOT DOWN. THE FRONT ENTRY |
| WOULD ALSO HAVE TO HAVE A CODE COMPLIANT EGRESS RAMP ON |
| THE CLEMATIS SIDE OF THE BUILDING. |
| |
| |
| 1ST ROUND OF COMMENTS. SHEET A1.5 DOES NOT SHOW IF THE |
| 2 MEANS OF EGRESS FROM THE CLEMATIS SIDE AND THE 2ND |
| MEANS OF EGRESS FROM OLIVE ARE LEVEL WITH THE SIDEWALK. |
| THE FINISH FLOOR WITHIN THE TENANT SPACE IS |
| APPROXIMATELY 6 TO 8 INCHES ABOVE THE SIDEWALK. 1ST ON |
| THE LIST IS AN ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE; PLEASE NOTE WITH |
| THE OCCUPANT LOAD OF GREATER THAN 50 IT REQUIRES 2 |
| MEANS OF EGRESS. |
| 2014 FBC-ACCESSIBILITY CODE. 206.4.1 PUBLIC ENTRANCES. |
| (DOORWAYS) IN ADDITION TO ENTRANCES REQUIRED BY 206.4.2 |
| THROUGH 206.4.9, AT LEAST 60 PERCENT (2 X 0.60 = 1.2 OR |
| 2) OF ALL PUBLIC ENTRANCES SHALL COMPLY WITH 404. |
| BARRIERS AT COMMON OR EMERGENCY ENTRANCES AND EXITS OF |
| BUSINESS ESTABLISHMENTS CONDUCTING BUSINESS WITH THE |
| GENERAL PUBLIC THAT ARE EXISTING, UNDER CONSTRUCTION, |
| OR UNDER CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION WHICH WOULD PREVENT |
| A PERSON FROM USING SUCH ENTRANCES OR EXITS SHALL BE |
| REMOVED. |
| |
| 2D)SEMI- COMPLIED, SEE COMMENT ABOVE FOR A 2ND |
| ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE FOR THE CLEMATIS SIDE. |
| 2014 FBC-B 1003.5 ELEVATION CHANGE. PLEASE SHOW HOW THE |
| 2ND ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE (CLEMATIS ST.)WITH RAMP. |
| 1ST ROUND OF COMMENTS. WHERE CHANGES IN ELEVATION OF |
| LESS THAN 12 INCHES EXIST IN THE MEANS OF EGRESS, |
| SLOPED SURFACES SHALL BE USED. WHERE THE SLOPE IS |
| GREATER THAN ONE UNIT VERTICAL IN 20 UNITS HORIZONTAL |
| (5-PERCENT SLOPE), RAMPS COMPLYING WITH SECTION 1010 |
| SHALL BE USED. WHERE THE DIFFERENCE IN ELEVATION IS 6 |
| INCHES OR LESS, THE RAMP SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH EITHER |
| HANDRAILS OR FLOOR FINISH MATERIALS THAT CONTRAST WITH |
| ADJACENT FLOOR FINISH MATERIALS. |
| 1003.5.1 ACCESSIBILITY. FOR ACCESSIBILITY PROVISIONS |
| RELATED TO CHANGES IN LEVELS, SEE THE FLORIDA BUILDING |
| CODE, ACCESSIBILITY. SEE RAMPS 405. 1- 10 AND HANDRAILS |
| 505.1-10.2. |
| |
| 3) SHEET A2.0: |
| |
| 3A) 2ND REQUEST, SEMI-COMPLIED. SHEET A6.0 THE DOOR |
| SCHEDULE LIST DOORS 101B & 101C UNDER HARDWARE AS |
| ETR, PLEASE DEFINE. 107.2.1.3 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS |
| REQUIRED. |
| 1ST ROUND COMMENTS. SHEET A2.0 SHOWS THE 3 EGRESS DOORS |
| 101 A, B, & C. SHEET A3.0 THE DOOR SCHEDULE ONLY SHOWS |
| DOOR 101C WITH THE REQUIRED PANIC HARDWARE. ONLY (1) OF |
| THE FRONT ENTRY DOORS CAN HAVE A KEYED LOCK THE OTHER |
| HAS TO HAVE PANIC HARDWARE. |
| IN FBC-B 1008.1.9.3 LOCKS AND LATCHES. LOCKS AND |
| LATCHES SHALL BE PERMITTED TO PREVENT OPERATION OF |
| DOORS WHERE ANY OF THE FOLLOWING EXISTS: |
| 1. PLACES OF DETENTION OR RESTRAINT. |
| 2. IN BUILDINGS IN OCCUPANCY GROUP A HAVING AN OCCUPANT |
| LOAD OF 300 OR LESS, GROUPS B, F, M AND S, |
| AND IN PLACES OF RELIGIOUS WORSHIP, THE MAIN EXTERIOR |
| DOOR OR DOORS ARE PERMITTED TO BE EQUIPPED |
| WITH KEY-OPERATED LOCKING DEVICES FROM THE EGRESS SIDE |
| PROVIDED: |
| 2.1. THE LOCKING DEVICE IS READILY DISTINGUISHABLE AS |
| LOCKED; |
| 2.2. A READILY VISIBLE DURABLE SIGN IS POSTED ON THE |
| EGRESS SIDE ON OR ADJACENT TO THE DOOR STATING: THIS |
| DOOR TO REMAIN UNLOCKED WHEN BUILDING IS OCCUPIED. THE |
| SIGN SHALL BE IN LETTERS 1 INCH HIGH |
| ON A CONTRASTING BACKGROUND; AND |
| 2.3. THE USE OF THE KEY-OPERATED LOCKING DEVICE IS |
| REVOKABLE BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FOR DUE CAUSE. |
| 3. WHERE EGRESS DOORS ARE USED IN PAIRS, APPROVED |
| AUTOMATIC FLUSH BOLTS SHALL BE PERMITTED TO BE |
| USED, PROVIDED THAT THE DOOR LEAF HAVING THE AUTOMATIC |
| FLUSH BOLTS HAS NO DOORKNOB OR SURFACE- |
| MOUNTED HARDWARE. |
| |
| 3B) 2ND REQUEST. PLEASE NOTE THIS DOOR(101B) IS AN |
| EXISTING DOOR UNDER THE EXISTING BUILDING CODE SECTION |
| 1012.8 THE EXISTING BUILDING CODE SENDS YOU TO THE 2014 |
| ACCESSIBILITY CODE UNDER THE DISPROPORTIONATE COST (II) |
| AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE TO ALTERED AREAS THIS DOOR WOULD BE |
| REQUIRED TO BE MADE ACCESSIBLE BEFORE ANY WORK WOULD BE |
| INCLUDED IN BRINGING THE RESTROOMS INTO CONFORMANCE, |
| RESTROOMS IS THE 3RD AREA AND IN THAT ORDER WHERE FUNDS |
| ARE TO BE SPENT, (III) AT LEAST ONE ACCESSIBLE RESTROOM |
| FOR EACH SEX OR A SINGLE UNISEX RESTROOM. ACCESSIBILITY |
| CODE SECTION ACCESS. CODE 404.2.4 MANEUVERING |
| CLEARANCES. MINIMUM MANEUVERING CLEARANCES AT DOORS AND |
| GATES SHALL COMPLY WITH 404.2.4. MANEUVERING CLEARANCES |
| SHALL EXTEND THE FULL WIDTH OF THE DOORWAY AND THE |
| REQUIRED LATCH SIDE OR HINGE SIDE CLEARANCE. ALSO LOOK |
| AT 404.3 AUTOMATIC AND POWER ASSISTED DOORS AND THE |
| REQUIREMENT FOR BATTERY BACK UP IN CASE OF FAILURE OF |
| ELECTRIC. |
| |
| 1ST ROUND OF COMMENTS. THERE IS AN EXISTING DOOR (101B) |
| IN THE CORRIDOR THAT LEADS TO THE RESTROOMS JUST PAST |
| THE BACKROOM # 104. THIS IS AN EXISTING DOOR THAT WOULD |
| STILL NEED TO MEET THE ACCESSIBILITY CODE SECTION |
| ACCESS. CODE 404.2.4 MANEUVERING CLEARANCES. MINIMUM |
| MANEUVERING CLEARANCES AT DOORS AND GATES SHALL COMPLY |
| WITH 404.2.4. MANEUVERING CLEARANCES SHALL EXTEND THE |
| FULL WIDTH OF THE DOORWAY AND THE REQUIRED LATCH SIDE |
| OR HINGE SIDE CLEARANCE. ALSO LOOK AT 404.3 AUTOMATIC |
| AND POWER ASSISTED DOORS AND THE REQUIREMENT FOR |
| BATTERY BACK UP IN CASE OF FAILURE OF ELECTRIC. |
| |
| 4) 2ND REQUEST. THE RESPONSE INDICATES SEE SHEET A6.0 |
| FOR WIND DESIGN CRITERIA ADDED TO STOREFRONT. PLEASE |
| NOTE PRESSURES WERE ADDED BUT THE WIND DESIGN CRITERIA |
| THAT THE PRESSURES ARE DERIVED FROM WERE NOT. |
| 1ST ROUND OF COMMENTS. SHEET A3.0 SHOWS THE ELEVATIONS |
| WITH NEW STOREFRONT WINDOW AND DOOR ASSEMBLIES. SHEET |
| A0.1 LIST THE PRODUCT APPROVALS REQUIRED FOR THIS |
| PROJECT BUT THERE IS NO WIND DESIGN CRITERIA GIVEN, NO |
| PRESSURES. |
| 2014 FBC-B 1603.1.4 WIND DESIGN DATA. |
| THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION RELATED TO WIND LOADS SHALL |
| BE SHOWN, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER WIND LOADS GOVERN THE |
| DESIGN OF THE LATERAL FORCE-RESISTING SYSTEM OF THE |
| STRUCTURE: |
| |
| 4.1. ULTIMATE DESIGN WIND SPEED, VULT, (3-SECOND GUST), |
| MILES PER HOUR (KM/HR) AND NOMINAL DESIGN WIND SPEED, |
| VASD, AS DETERMINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION |
| 1609.3.1. |
| |
| 4.2. RISK CATEGORY. |
| |
| 4.3. WIND EXPOSURE. APPLICABLE WIND DIRECTION IF MORE |
| THAN ONE WIND EXPOSURE IS UTILIZED. TABLE 1609.7.2. |
| HEIGHT AND EXPOSURE. |
| |
| 4.4. APPLICABLE INTERNAL PRESSURE COEFFICIENT. |
| |
| 4.5. SEMI-COMPLIED, PRESSURES ARE NOT STATED IF THEY |
| ARE IN VULT OR VASD. DESIGN WIND PRESSURES TO BE USED |
| FOR EXTERIOR COMPONENTS AND CLADDING MATERIALS NOT |
| SPECIFICALLY DESIGNED BY THE REGISTERED DESIGN |
| PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DESIGN OF THE |
| STRUCTURE, PSF. |
| TABLE 1609.7(2) ADJUSTMENT FACTORS FOR HEIGHT & |
| EXPOSURE. PROVIDE THE MEAN ROOF HEIGHT FOR THE |
| BUILDING. |
| 1609.3.1 WIND SPEED CONVERSION VULT TO VASD. |
| |
| 5) 2ND REQUEST. RESPONSE LETTER STATES THE ARCHITECTS |
| SHOP DRAWING STAMP OF APPROVAL IS ON THE PRODUCT |
| APPROVALS, OF THE 4 APPROVALS SUBMITTED NONE HAVE THE |
| SHOP DRAWING STAMP OF APPROVAL. |
| 1ST ROUND OF COMMENTS. NONE OF THE PRODUCT APPROVALS |
| SUBMITTED SHOW THEY WERE APPROVED BY THE DESIGNER OF |
| RECORD. |
| W. P. B. 107.3.4.1 PRODUCT APPROVALS. THOSE PRODUCTS |
| WHICH ARE REGULATED BY THE DCA RULE 9N-03 SHALL BE |
| REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF |
| RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. |
| FL 61G1-23.015 (2) THE ARCHITECT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR |
| SUPERVISING AND REVIEWING ALL PROJECT DATA, REPORTS, |
| SHOP DRAWINGS ETC.. |
| |
| 5A)2ND REQUEST. PLEASE NOTE THE SUBMITTED NEW PRODUCT |
| APPROVAL WITH STAMP NOT IN THE PERMIT PACKAGE PLANS, |
| STAPLED TO COMMENTS. THE PRODUCT APPROVAL IS STAPLED |
| SHUT TO YOU CANNOT VIEW THE PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| |
| THE NOA FOR THE ALUMINUM ROOF TOP A/C STAND SUBMITTED |
| WAS 13-1017.09, THE SHEET A.01 LIST NOA 17-0320.02. |
| PLEASE IDENTIFY THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS CALCULATING |
| THE AREA (SIDE VIEW) OF THE ROOF TOP COMPRESSORS, |
| CONFIGURATION ON STAND, THE MEAN ROOF HEIGHT OF THE |
| STAND AND COMPRESSORS, WEIGHT, CIRCLED THE DESIGN |
| PARAMETERS IN THE TABLES, ANCHORS AND UPLIFT VERSES |
| MOMENT FOR THE UNIT TO THE STAND AND THE STAND TO THE |
| ROOF. THE PRODUCT APPROVAL IS TO BE REVIEWED BY THE |
| DESIGNER OF RECORD, APPROVED BEFORE SUBMISSION TO THE |
| BUILDING DEPARTMENT. |
| |
| 5B) 2ND REQUEST. . PLEASE NOTE THE SUBMITTED NEW |
| PRODUCT APPROVAL WITH STAMP NOT IN THE PERMIT PACKAGE |
| PLANS, STAPLED TO COMMENTS. THE PRODUCT APPROVAL IS |
| STAPLED SHUT TO YOU CANNOT VIEW THE PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| THE SHEET A.01 LIST FOR THE STOREFRONT NOA 14-0430.28 |
| WHICH IS IR-500 ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM. |
| SUBMITTED IS NOA 15-0622.11 WHICH WAS NOT REFERENCED |
| BUT WILL BE REQUIRED SINCE THE STOREFRONT DOORS ARE |
| UNDER A SEPARATE PRODUCT APPROVAL, MISSING IS THE |
| GLAZED WINDOW STOREFRONT NOA. |
| IDENTIFY GLAZING/ MULLIONS. |
| PLEASE IDENTIFY ON THE PRODUCT APPROVAL BEFORE |
| SUBMITTING TO DESIGNER OF RECORD AND BEFORE SUBMISSION |
| TO THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. FOR ALL PRODUCTS WITH |
| GLAZING, PLEASE IDENTIFY THE OPENING WIDTH & HEIGHT, |
| TYPE OF GLAZING, MULLION INFORMATION IF REQUIRED, |
| ATTACHMENTS AND ASSOCIATE PRESSURES FOR EACH OPENING |
| SIZE. 2014 FBC-B 1405.13.1 INSTALLATION. WINDOWS AND |
| DOORS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPROVED |
| MANUFACTURERS INSTRUCTIONS. FASTENER SIZE AND SPACING |
| SHALL BE PROVIDED IN SUCH INSTRUCTIONS AND SHALL BE |
| CALCULATED BASED ON MAXIMUM LOADS AND SPACING USED IN |
| THE TESTS. |
| |
| 5C) 2ND REQUEST. NOA 15-0218.11 TC-5 STYLE STEEL ROOF |
| CURB FOR CARRIER ROOFTOP UNITS. SHEET 2 OF 5 STATES |
| RESTRAINT BRACKET QUANTITY TO BE DETERMINED BY PROJECT |
| SPECIFIC CALCULATIONS. THE CALCULATIONS HAVE NOT BEEN |
| PROVIDED. PLEASE NOTE TECH PAGE 5 OF 5. RESTRAINT |
| BRACKET QUANTITY IS DETERMINED BY PROJECT SPECIFIC |
| CALCULATIONS, PERFORMED BY A FLORIDA LICENSED PE OR |
| FLORIDA REGISTERED ARCHITECT THAT CONSIDER THE UNIQUE |
| COMBINATION OF THE UNIT SIZE AND APPLICABLE LATERAL AND |
| UPLIFT PRESSURES FOR EACH JOB. PLEASE PROVIDE |
| CALCULATION FOR HOW MANY BRACKETS WILL BE NEEDED FOR |
| EACH TYPE OF UNIT. |
| |
| 5D) 2ND REQUEST. NOA 15-1109.04 PLEASE IDENTIFY THE |
| COMPONENTS MAKING UP THE SYSTEM AND PAGE 8 OF 9 THE |
| FASTENERS AND SUBSTRATE. 107.2.1.3 ADDITIONAL |
| INFORMATION IS REQUIRED. |
| |
| 6) COMPLIED. |
| |
| 7) CHANGE IN OCCUPANCY IS REQUIRED TO BE REVIEWED BY |
| THE PALM BEACH COUNTY IMPACT FEE OFFICE FOR ASSESSMENT |
| BEFORE PERMIT ISSUANCE. THE ACTUAL PERMIT SET OF PLANS |
| MUST BE STAMPED BY THAT OFFICE, AND A COPY OF THE PAID |
| RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE PERMIT APPLICATION. PLEASE CALL |
| (561)233-5025 FOR MORE INFORMATION. |
| |
| 8) WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION |
| & REMOVE ANY VOIDED SHEETS & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS |
| NECESSARY, COLLATE AND STAPLE INTO SETS OF PLANS. A |
| TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT |
| NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, |
| IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE |
| CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. |
| THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| |
| JAMES A. WITMER BN, PX, CBO |
| SENIOR COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DIVISION / DEVELOPMENT SERVICES |
| DEPARTMENT |
| 401 CLEMATIS ST. |
| WEST PALM BEACH. FL 33402 |
| TEL: 561-805-6715 |
| FAX: 561-805-6676 |
| E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| |
| |