Date |
Text |
2017-11-14 12:17:23 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) ALTERATION THIRD BUILDING REVIEW |
| CHECKLIST. |
| CODE: FBC 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| |
| 1- CLEARLY SPECIFY TYPE AND SIZE OF EXISTING BEDROOM |
| WINDOWS AND TYPE AND SIZE OF PROPOSED BEDROOM WINDOWS |
| TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE EGRESS REQUIREMENTS. SEC. |
| 704 OF FBC-EXISTING BUILDING, 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. SIZES OF WINDOWS SHOWN ON THE |
| FLOOR PLAN ON SHEET A-2 DON'T MATCH SIZES SHOWN ON THE |
| EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS ON SHEET A-3. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO |
| MATCH. MASTER BEDROOM AND BEDROOM #2 WINDOW SIZE SHOWN |
| ON PLAN DON'T MATCH THOSE SHOWN ON THE ELEVATIONS. |
| NOTE: THE ONLY WINDOW SIZES THAT COMPLY WITH ALL THE |
| EGRESS REQUIREMENTS ARE THE 36" X 63" SINGLE HUNG |
| WINDOW SPECIFIED FOR BEDROOM #2 ON THE EAST ELEVATION |
| AND THE 36" X 72" SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS SPECIFIED FOR THE |
| MASTER BEDROOM. THE OTHER WINDOW SIZES DON'T SEEM TO |
| COMPLY WITH THE MIN. 24" CLEAR HEIGHT OPENING. REVISE |
| PLANS AS REQUIRED. |
| |
| NOTE: ARCHITECT MAY BE CHARGED 4 TIMES THE PLAN REVIEW |
| FEE AS REQUIRED BY FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B) FOR |
| MULTIPLE PLAN REVIEW REJECTIONS. |
| |
| 2- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY |
| FAC 61G20-3.001 FOR: |
| A) EXTERIOR SWING DOORS AS SHOWN ON PLANS. NOA |
| 01-0122.09 SUBMITTED EXPIRED ON APRIL 25, 2007. NEED |
| CURRENT NOA. |
| RESPONSE: NO PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED AT THIS TIME. |
| NOTE: THIS MAY BE SUBMITTED AFTER PERMIT IS ISSUED, BUT |
| BEFORE INSPECTIONS TO AVOID CONFLICT/DELAYS. |
| |
| 3- ARCHITECT OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS |
| (INCLUDING THE ONES THAT WERE ALREADY SUBMITTED) AS |
| REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| RESPONSE. REPEAT COMMENT. |
| |
| 4- NEW SHEET T-1: |
| A) THE CONSTRUCTION TYPE SPECIFIED UNDER THE LOCATION |
| MAP IS INCORRECT. THIS IS A TYPE VB CONSTRUCTION NOT |
| TYPE III. SEC. 602 FBC-5TH EDITION (2014). |
| RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. |
| |
| B) AS REQUESTED ON PREVIOUS CHECKLIST THE SCOPE OF WORK |
| WAS REVISED TO SAY ALTERATION LEVEL 3 INSTEAD OF LEVEL |
| 2. THIS WAS DONE, BUT THERE IS STILL REFERENCE FOR |
| ALTERATION LEVEL 2 BELOW THE FRONT ELEVATION SHOWN ON |
| THE UPPER RIGHT CORNER OF THIS DRAWING. CLARIFY/REVISE |
| AS REQUIRED TO MATCH THE SCOPE OF WORK. SEC. 107.2.1 |
| CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| |
| ****PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH |
| COMMENT TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. |
| ****PLEASE INSERT ANY REVISED DRAWING AND REMOVE OLD |
| DRAWING. DON'T STAPLE OLD DRAWINGS. SUBMIT OLD DRAWINGS |
| FOR REFERENCE. |
| |
| IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT |
| JULIO GOMEZ |
| COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| BUILDING DIVISION |
| (561)805-6712 |
| [email protected] |