Date |
Text |
2017-10-12 14:17:04 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) ADDITION/ALTERATION SECOND REVIEW |
| COMMENTS. |
| CODE: FBC 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| |
| 1- AFTER PLANS ARE REVISED, BRING THEM TO PALM BEACH |
| COUNTY (2300 N. JOG RD.) FOR IMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT. |
| BRING BACK COUNTY STAMPED PLANS AND COPY OF PAID |
| RECEIPT IF FEES ARE DUE. COUNTY IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE OF |
| THE UNIFIED LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. |
| RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. NOT RESPONSE AT ALL. |
| |
| 2- ALL PLANS NEED THE ORIGINAL SIGNATURE (NOT COPY) OF |
| THE ARCHITECT. FAC 61G1-16.003. |
| RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. ONLY THE SHEETS THAT WERE |
| REVISED HAD THE ARCHITECT'S ORIGINAL SEAL AND |
| SIGNATURE. OTHER SHEETS NEED TO HAVE THE ARCHITECT'S |
| ORIGINAL SEAL AND SIGNATURE AS WELL. |
| |
| 3- PROVIDE ENERGY CALCULATIONS. SEC. R101.4.3 |
| FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| RESPONSE: THIS IS THE FIRST REVIEW OF THE ENERGY |
| CALCULATIONS. THE FOLLOWING NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED: |
| A) FORM 405-2014 SUBMITTED NEEDS TO BE CERTIFIED AND |
| DATED AT THE BOTTOM BY THE OWNER OR LEGALLY DESIGNATED |
| AGENT AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R103.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY |
| CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| |
| B) COOLING AND HEATING INFORMATION DOESN'T MATCH |
| INFORMATION SHOWN ON THE EQUIPMENT SIZING CALCULATIONS |
| AND A/C PLAN. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. NOTE: |
| COORDINATE WITH MECHANICAL REVIEW COMMENTS. SEC. |
| R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION |
| (2014). |
| |
| C) PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION ON TOP OF FORM, |
| INCLUDING THE BUILDER NAME AS REQUIRED BY SEC. |
| R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| |
| D) PAGE 2 OF 4 SPECIFIES AN ATTIC VENT RATIO OF 1/300. |
| TYPICALLY, THE VENT RATIO IS 1/150. ARCHITECTURAL PLANS |
| DON'T SHOW ANY ATTIC VENTILATION SHOWING COMPLIANCE |
| WITH THE 1/300 VENT RATIO. PERSON PREPARING THE ENERGY |
| CALCULATIONS TO PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND |
| SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING HOW THE HOUSE IS TAKING THE |
| 1/300 VENTILATION RATIO AS REQUIRED BY THE EXCEPTION ON |
| SEC. R806.2 FBC-RESIDENTIAL, 5TH EDITION (2014). OR |
| PERSON PREPARING THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS TO REVISE THE |
| VENT RATIO AS REQUIRED. |
| |
| E) BUILDER TO COMPLETE THE ENERGY PERFORMANCE LEVEL |
| (EPL) DISPLAY CARD. SEC. R405.4.3 FBC-ENERGY |
| CONSERVATION. |
| |
| NOTE: |
| LABEL FOR WINDOWS AND DOORS SHOWING THE U-FACTOR AND |
| SHGC FACTOR SPECIFIED ON THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS WILL |
| BE REQUIRED FOR INSPECTION WHEN THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS |
| ARE NOT USING THE DEFAULT FACTOR FOR GLAZING. AND, |
| BLOWER DOOR TEST IS REQUIRED AFTER JULY 1, 2017. |
| |
| 4- BEDROOM #2 EGRESS WINDOWS. PROVIDE MANUFACTURER'S |
| CUT SHEETS SHOWING THAT THE SPECIFIED WINDOW SIZE |
| COMPLIES WITH ALL THE EGRESS REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. R310 |
| FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. MANUFACTURER'S INFORMATION |
| WAS NOT SUBMITTED. PROVIDE INFORMATION SHOWING THE |
| SPECIFIED SIZE OF WINDOW. UNABLE TO VERIFY ALL EGRESS |
| REQUIREMENTS. |
| |
| 5- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY |
| FAC 61G20-3.001 FOR: |
| A) ROOF TILE ADHESIVE THAT IS LISTED IN THE ROOF TILE |
| NOA 16-0314.08 SUBMITTED. NOTE: CLEARLY SPECIFY PADDY |
| SIZE TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIRED ATTACHMENT |
| RESISTANCE. COORDINATE WITH ROOF TILE NOA SUBMITTED. |
| |
| B) SLIDING GLASS DOORS SHOWING THE SIZES SPECIFIED ON |
| PLANS. |
| RESPONSE: DRAWINGS SUBMITTED DON'T COVER THE SIZE OF |
| DOOR #4. SEE MAXIMUM PANEL SIZE. AND, NEED TO PROVIDE |
| COMPLETE PRODUCT APPROVAL, INCLUDING THE FLORIDA |
| PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER PAGE THAT CORRESPOND TO DRAWINGS |
| SUBMITTED. |
| |
| C) ENTRY DOOR AS SHOWN ON PLANS. |
| RESPONSE: INFORMATION SUBMITTED IS INCOMPLETE. PROVIDE |
| THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER PAGE THAT |
| CORRESPONDS TO DRAWINGS SUBMITTED. |
| |
| D) FIXED WINDOWS AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS. |
| RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. |
| |
| E) EGRESS CASEMENT WINDOWS AS SPECIFIED FOR |
| STUDY/BEDROOM. AND PROVIDE MANUFACTURER'S CUT SHEETS |
| SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH THE EGRESS REQUIREMENTS. |
| |
| 6- DESIGNER OF RECORD TO APPROVE ABOVE PRODUCT |
| APPROVALS. SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. NOTE: |
| ARCHITECT TO PLACE THE REVIEW STAMP ON THE FRONT OF THE |
| COVER PAGE NOT ON THE BACK. THIS IS REQUIRED TO |
| FACILITATE PROPER SCANNING OF ALL DOCUMENTS. |
| |
| 7- THERE IS A RED TAG FOR DEMOLITION WORK WITHOUT |
| PERMIT. PLEASE GET THE DEMOLITION PERMIT TO REVOKE |
| EXPIRED DEMOLITION PERMIT APPLICATION # 16080126. SEC. |
| 105.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| |
| 8- VALUATION DECLARED IN THE PERMIT APPLICATION IS TOO |
| LOW. VALUATION TO INCLUDE ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, |
| CONTRACTOR'S OVERHEAD AND PROFIT AND ALL THE DESIGN |
| PROFESSIONAL FEES AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 109.3 CITY |
| AMENDMENTS. REVISE VALUATION TO INCLUDE ALL WORK AND |
| DESIGN PROFESSIONAL FEES. |
| RESPONSE: PROVIDE COPY OF SIGNED CONTRACT INCLUDING THE |
| DESIGN PROFESSIONAL FEES. |
| |
| ****PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER CLEARLY ADDRESSING |
| EACH COMMENT TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS... |
| *****PLEASE INSERT ANY REVISED SHEET AND REMOVE OLD |
| DRAWING. DON'T STAPLE OLD DRAWINGS TO RESUBMITTED SET. |
| SUBMIT OLD DRAWINGS FOR REFERENCE. |
| |
| IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT |
| JULIO GOMEZ |
| COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| BUILDING DIVISION. |
| (561)805-6712 |
| [email protected] |