Date |
Text |
2017-07-14 12:07:30 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE |
| MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: |
| |
| |
| |
| 1) SHEET A 101 - THE PROPOSED PROJECT ALTERS THE |
| EXISTING FLOOR PLAN, INCREASES THE EXISTING SQUARE |
| FOOTAGE AND EXIT DOORS. |
| |
| PLEASE PROVIDE A COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLAN SHEET FOR |
| THIS OCCUPANCY THAT ILLUSTRATE NEW OCCUPANT LOADS, NEW |
| SEATING, TRAVEL DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, |
| DEAD-END CORRIDORS, EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, |
| EXITS LEADING TO A PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER |
| LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT. |
| |
| |
| |
| 2) SHEET A 101 - A SET OF EXTERIOR DOUBLE DOORS ARE |
| BEING REMOVED AND REPLACED BY EXTERIOR BI-FOLD DOORS. |
| |
| THE EXTERIOR DOUBLE DOORS ARE A REQUIRED EXIT FROM THE |
| ASSEMBLY SPACE. THE PROPOSED EXTERIOR BI-FOLD DOORS ARE |
| NOT APPROVED EXIT DOORS. |
| |
| PLEASE CORRECT OR PROVIDE A DETAILED LIFE SAFETY REVIEW |
| JUSTIFYING CODE REQUIRED EXIT WIDTHS, EXIT SEPARATIONS, |
| AND TRAVEL DISTANCES PER NFPA 101, CHAPTER 13, EXISTING |
| ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCIES AND CHAPTER 7, MEANS OF EGRESS. |
| |
| |
| |
| 3) SHEET A 101 - THERE IS A NEW DOOR INDICATED WITH NO |
| NEW DOOR SCHEDULE. |
| |
| PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILED DOOR INFORMATION INCLUDING |
| HARDWARE, ANY LOCKS, OR LATCHES. |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| 4) DOES THE OCCUPANCY HAVE AN EXISTING FIRE ALARM OF |
| FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM. |
| |
| ALL WORK ON ANY FIRE ALARM OR FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM |
| SHALL BE DONE UNDER SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS BY CERTIFIED |
| LIFE SAFETY CONTRACTORS. |
| |
| PLEASE REIVEW AND PROVIDE AN APPLICABLE NOTE. |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| 5) WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE PLAN SHEET |
| REVISION CLOUDS OR NUMBERED NARRATIVE RESPONSES TO THE |
| ABOVE. |
| |
| |
| |
| 6) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED ON THE |
| RE-SUBMITTAL OF THE ABOVE. |
| |
| |
| |
| PETER LEDUC |
| FIRE MARSHAL |
| 561-804-4709 |
| [email protected] |
| |
| |
| |