Date |
Text |
2017-06-26 14:43:08 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE |
| MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: |
| |
| |
| 1) SHEET ALS 1 - DOOR 300 IS INDICATED AS 45-FIRE RATED |
| IN THE DOOR SCHEDULE. THE WALL THAT IT IS INDICATED |
| WITHIN DOES NOT HAVE A FIRE RATING. |
| |
| PLEASE REVIEW, CLARIFY OR CORRECT. |
| |
| |
| |
| 2) SHEET ALS 1 - DOOR 328 A IS INDICATED AS 45-FIRE |
| RATED IN THE DOOR SCHEDULE. THE WALL THAT IT IS |
| INDICATED WITHIN DOES NOT HAVE A FIRE RATING. |
| |
| PLEASE REVIEW, CLARIFY OR CORRECT. |
| |
| |
| |
| 3) SHEET ALS 1 - DOOR 321 IS NOT INDICATED AS A 45-FIRE |
| RATED IN THE DOOR SCHEDULE. THE WALL THAT IT IS |
| INDICATED WITHIN DOES NOT HAVE A FIRE RATING. |
| |
| PER NFPA 101, CHAPTER 39 EXISTING BUISNESS OCCUPANCIES. |
| |
| 39.2.2.7 EXIT PASSAGEWAYS. EXIT PASSAGEWAYS COMPLYING |
| WITH 7.2.6 SHALL BE PERMITTED. |
| |
| 7.2.6.2 ENCLOSURE. AN EXIT PASSAGEWAY SHALL BE |
| SEPARATED FROM OTHER PARTS OF THE BUILDING AS SPECIFIED |
| IN 7.1.3.2, AND THE FOLLOWING ALTERNATIVES SHALL BE |
| PERMITTED: |
| (1) FIRE WINDOWS IN ACCORDANCE WITH 8.3.3 SHALL BE |
| PERMITTED TO BE INSTALLED IN THE SEPARATION IN A |
| BUILDING PROTECTED THROUGHOUT BY AN APPROVED, |
| SUPERVISED AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM IN ACCORDANCE |
| WITH SECTION 9.7. |
| (2) EXISTING FIXED WIRED GLASS PANELS IN STEEL SASH |
| SHALL BE PERMITTED TO BE CONTINUED IN USE IN THE |
| SEPARATION IN BUILDINGS PROTECTED THROUGHOUT BY AN |
| APPROVED, SUPERVISED AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM IN |
| ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 9.7. |
| |
| 7.1.3.2 EXITS. |
| 7.1.3.2.1 WHERE THIS CODE REQUIRES AN EXIT TO BE |
| SEPARATED FROM OTHER PARTS OF THE BUILDING, THE |
| SEPARATING CONSTRUCTION SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF |
| SECTION 8.2 AND THE FOLLOWING: |
| |
| (3)* THE SEPARATION SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 2-HOUR FIRE |
| RESISTANCE RATING WHERE THE EXIT CONNECTS FOUR OR MORE |
| STORIES, UNLESS ONE OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS EXISTS: |
| (A) IN EXISTING NON-HIGH-RISE BUILDINGS, EXISTING EXIT |
| STAIR ENCLOSURES SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 1-HOUR FIRE |
| RESISTANCE RATING. |
| (B) IN EXISTING BUILDINGS PROTECTED THROUGHOUT BY AN |
| APPROVED, SUPERVISED AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM IN |
| ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 9.7, EXISTING EXIT STAIR |
| ENCLOSURES SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 1-HOUR FIRE RESISTANCE |
| RATING. |
| (C) THE MINIMUM 1-HOUR ENCLOSURES IN ACCORDANCE WITH |
| 28.2.2.1.2, 29.2.2.1.2, 30.2.2.1.2, AND 31.2.2.1.2 |
| SHALL BE PERMITTED AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO THE REQUIREMENT |
| OF 7.1.3.2.1(3). |
| (4) RESERVED. |
| (5) THE MINIMUM 2-HOUR FIRE RESISTANCE?RATED SEPARATION |
| REQUIRED BY 7.1.3.2.1(3) SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF AN |
| ASSEMBLY OF NONCOMBUSTIBLE OR LIMITED-COMBUSTIBLE |
| MATERIALS AND SHALL BE SUPPORTED BY CONSTRUCTION HAVING |
| A MINIMUM 2-HOUR FIRE RESISTANCE RATING, UNLESS |
| OTHERWISE PERMITTED BY 7.1.3.2.1(7). |
| |
| |
| PLEASE REVIEW, CLARIFY OR CORRECT. |
| |
| |
| |
| 4) SHEET ALS 1 - DOOR 301 IS NOT INDICATED AS A 45-FIRE |
| RATED IN THE DOOR SCHEDULE. THE WALL THAT IT IS |
| INDICATED WITHIN DOES NOT HAVE A FIRE RATING. |
| |
| PLEASE REVIEW, CLARIFY OR CORRECT. |
| |
| |
| |
| 5) THERE IS NO INDICATIONS OF THE ELEVATOR OR COMMON |
| CORRIDOR AS BEING PRESSURIZED, SMOKE CONTROLED, OR |
| BEING A SMOKE BARRIER. THUSLY, REQUIRING THE NEW WALLS |
| AND DOORS OF THE COMMON CORRIDOR TO BE COMPLIANT. |
| |
| PLEASE REVIEW THE EXISITING LIFE SAFETY FEATURES AND |
| EQUIPMENT OF THIS HIGH RISE AND ENSURE THAT ALL LIFE |
| SAFETY FEATURES ARE MAINTAINED AND NOT BEING DIMINSIHED |
| BY THIS PROPOSED PROJECT6) |
| |
| |
| |
| 6) WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE PLAN SHEET |
| REVISION CLOUDS OR NUMBERED NARRATIVE RESPONSES TO THE |
| ABOVE. |
| |
| |
| 7) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED ON THE |
| RE-SUBMITTAL OF THE ABOVE. |
| |
| |
| PETER LEDUC |
| FIRE MARSHAL |
| 561-804-4709 |
| [email protected] |
| |
| |