Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Permit 17060979
Permit Number 17060979
Review Stop FIRE
Sequence Number 1
Notes
Date Text
2017-06-26 14:43:08THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE
 MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
  
 1) SHEET ALS 1 - DOOR 300 IS INDICATED AS 45-FIRE RATED
 IN THE DOOR SCHEDULE. THE WALL THAT IT IS INDICATED
 WITHIN DOES NOT HAVE A FIRE RATING.
  
 PLEASE REVIEW, CLARIFY OR CORRECT.
  
  
  
 2) SHEET ALS 1 - DOOR 328 A IS INDICATED AS 45-FIRE
 RATED IN THE DOOR SCHEDULE. THE WALL THAT IT IS
 INDICATED WITHIN DOES NOT HAVE A FIRE RATING.
  
 PLEASE REVIEW, CLARIFY OR CORRECT.
  
  
  
 3) SHEET ALS 1 - DOOR 321 IS NOT INDICATED AS A 45-FIRE
 RATED IN THE DOOR SCHEDULE. THE WALL THAT IT IS
 INDICATED WITHIN DOES NOT HAVE A FIRE RATING.
  
 PER NFPA 101, CHAPTER 39 EXISTING BUISNESS OCCUPANCIES.
  
 39.2.2.7 EXIT PASSAGEWAYS. EXIT PASSAGEWAYS COMPLYING
 WITH 7.2.6 SHALL BE PERMITTED.
  
 7.2.6.2 ENCLOSURE. AN EXIT PASSAGEWAY SHALL BE
 SEPARATED FROM OTHER PARTS OF THE BUILDING AS SPECIFIED
 IN 7.1.3.2, AND THE FOLLOWING ALTERNATIVES SHALL BE
 PERMITTED:
 (1) FIRE WINDOWS IN ACCORDANCE WITH 8.3.3 SHALL BE
 PERMITTED TO BE INSTALLED IN THE SEPARATION IN A
 BUILDING PROTECTED THROUGHOUT BY AN APPROVED,
 SUPERVISED AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM IN ACCORDANCE
 WITH SECTION 9.7.
 (2) EXISTING FIXED WIRED GLASS PANELS IN STEEL SASH
 SHALL BE PERMITTED TO BE CONTINUED IN USE IN THE
 SEPARATION IN BUILDINGS PROTECTED THROUGHOUT BY AN
 APPROVED, SUPERVISED AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 9.7.
  
 7.1.3.2 EXITS.
 7.1.3.2.1 WHERE THIS CODE REQUIRES AN EXIT TO BE
 SEPARATED FROM OTHER PARTS OF THE BUILDING, THE
 SEPARATING CONSTRUCTION SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF
 SECTION 8.2 AND THE FOLLOWING:
  
 (3)* THE SEPARATION SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 2-HOUR FIRE
 RESISTANCE RATING WHERE THE EXIT CONNECTS FOUR OR MORE
 STORIES, UNLESS ONE OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS EXISTS:
 (A) IN EXISTING NON-HIGH-RISE BUILDINGS, EXISTING EXIT
 STAIR ENCLOSURES SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 1-HOUR FIRE
 RESISTANCE RATING.
 (B) IN EXISTING BUILDINGS PROTECTED THROUGHOUT BY AN
 APPROVED, SUPERVISED AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 9.7, EXISTING EXIT STAIR
 ENCLOSURES SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 1-HOUR FIRE RESISTANCE
 RATING.
 (C) THE MINIMUM 1-HOUR ENCLOSURES IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 28.2.2.1.2, 29.2.2.1.2, 30.2.2.1.2, AND 31.2.2.1.2
 SHALL BE PERMITTED AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO THE REQUIREMENT
 OF 7.1.3.2.1(3).
 (4) RESERVED.
 (5) THE MINIMUM 2-HOUR FIRE RESISTANCE?RATED SEPARATION
 REQUIRED BY 7.1.3.2.1(3) SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF AN
 ASSEMBLY OF NONCOMBUSTIBLE OR LIMITED-COMBUSTIBLE
 MATERIALS AND SHALL BE SUPPORTED BY CONSTRUCTION HAVING
 A MINIMUM 2-HOUR FIRE RESISTANCE RATING, UNLESS
 OTHERWISE PERMITTED BY 7.1.3.2.1(7).
  
  
 PLEASE REVIEW, CLARIFY OR CORRECT.
  
  
  
 4) SHEET ALS 1 - DOOR 301 IS NOT INDICATED AS A 45-FIRE
 RATED IN THE DOOR SCHEDULE. THE WALL THAT IT IS
 INDICATED WITHIN DOES NOT HAVE A FIRE RATING.
  
 PLEASE REVIEW, CLARIFY OR CORRECT.
  
  
  
 5) THERE IS NO INDICATIONS OF THE ELEVATOR OR COMMON
 CORRIDOR AS BEING PRESSURIZED, SMOKE CONTROLED, OR
 BEING A SMOKE BARRIER. THUSLY, REQUIRING THE NEW WALLS
 AND DOORS OF THE COMMON CORRIDOR TO BE COMPLIANT.
  
 PLEASE REVIEW THE EXISITING LIFE SAFETY FEATURES AND
 EQUIPMENT OF THIS HIGH RISE AND ENSURE THAT ALL LIFE
 SAFETY FEATURES ARE MAINTAINED AND NOT BEING DIMINSIHED
 BY THIS PROPOSED PROJECT6)
  
  
  
 6) WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE PLAN SHEET
 REVISION CLOUDS OR NUMBERED NARRATIVE RESPONSES TO THE
 ABOVE.
  
  
 7) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED ON THE
 RE-SUBMITTAL OF THE ABOVE.
  
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
  


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved