Date |
Text |
2017-08-17 10:40:39 | NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (R3) SECOND BUILDING REVIEW |
| CHECKLIST. |
| CODE: FBC 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| |
| |
| NOTE: |
| BUILDING REVIEW MAY BE APPROVED WITH PROVISO. PROVISO |
| MEANS THAT CONTRACTOR AGREES TO SUBMIT REQUIRED |
| INFORMATION AFTER THE PERMIT IS ISSUED BUT BEFORE |
| INSPECTION TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. REVISION FEES |
| WILL APPLY. CONTRACTOR TO ADVICE IN WRITING IF PROVISO |
| OPTION IS PREFERRED AT THIS TIME. |
| |
| 1- ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED: |
| A) ENERGY CALCULATIONS NEED TO BE DONE FOR THE ACTUAL |
| ORIENTATION OF THE BUILDING NOT WORST CASE. REVISE ITEM |
| #5 AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY |
| CONSERVATION. |
| RESPONSE. REPEAT COMMENT. FRONT PAGE SAYS NO WORST |
| CASE. NEVERTHELESS, SECOND PAGE SAYS ROTATED 315 |
| DEGREES AND ORIENTATION SHOWN ON FOLLOWING PAGES IS NOT |
| THE ACTUAL ORIENTATION OF THE BUILDING. REVISE AS |
| REQUIRED. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR THE ACTUAL |
| ORIENTATION OF THE BUILDING. |
| |
| B) REVISE WALL TYPE ON ITEM #9(B) FOR THE ADJACENT |
| WALL. PLANS CALL FOR METAL FRAMING ON ONE SIDE AND WOOD |
| FRAMING ON THE OTHER SIDE. SEC. 101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY |
| CONSERVATION. |
| RESPONSE: PLANS AND ENERGY CALCULATIONS NEED TO BE |
| COORDINATED. FLOOR PLAN AND GENERAL WALL LEGEND ON |
| SHEET 2.1 SPECIFY WOOD FRAMING FOR THE BEARING WALLS L |
| AND METAL STUDS FOR NON BEARING WALLS. PLANS AND ENERGY |
| CALCULATIONS NEED TO MATCH. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| |
| C) HEATING INFORMATION SHOWN ON ITEM #13 DOESN'T T |
| MATCH INFORMATION SHOWN ON THE EQUIPMENT SIZING |
| CALCULATIONS. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. SEC. |
| R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. |
| |
| D) CONTRACTOR TO COMPLETE THE ENERGY PERFORMANCE LEVEL |
| (EPL) DISPLAY CARD AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R405.4.3 |
| FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. |
| |
| E) REVISE WALLS AND WINDOWS ORIENTATION SHOWN ON PAGE 3 |
| OF 5. COORDINATE WITH ITEM #1(A) ABOVE. SEC. |
| R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. |
| |
| F) REVISE THE DOORS INFORMATION SHOWN ON PAGE 3 OF 5. |
| WHERE ARE THE 16'-0" X 8'-0" INSULATED DOORS?. SEE |
| PLANS AND PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED. NOTE: DOORS WITH |
| GLAZING NEED TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE WINDOWS AREA AS |
| REQUIRED BY SEC. R405.5.3.3 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. |
| |
| NOTE: |
| LABEL FOR WINDOWS AND DOORS SHOWING THE U-FACTOR AND |
| SHGC FACTOR SPECIFIED ON ITEM #7 IS REQUIRED WHEN THE |
| ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE NOT USING THE SOFTWARE DEFAULT |
| FACTOR. |
| |
| 2- ROOF TILE UNDERLAYMENT FL11288-R15 SUBMITTED: |
| CLEARLY MARK SPECIFIC UNDERLAYMENT INSTALLATION SHOWING |
| THE DESIGN PRESSURES OF PROPOSED INSTALLATION TO VERIFY |
| COMPLIANCE WITH THE DESIGN PRESSURES OF SEC. R301.1 |
| FBC-RESIDENTIAL. NOTE: SEE PAGES 5,6 AND 7 OF |
| EVALUATION REPORT SUBMITTED. MARK SPECIFIC APPLICATION |
| #. |
| RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. CLEARLY IDENTIFY WHICH |
| ASSEMBLY ON PAGE 5, 6 OR 7 IS GOING TO BE INSTALLED. |
| NOTE: MAKE SURE ASSEMBLY IS FOR WOOD DECK. IF THE |
| SELECTED ASSEMBLY DOESN'T MEET THE DESIGN PRESSURES FOR |
| ALL ROOF ZONES, THEN IT CAN NOT BE USED. |
| (NOTE: ON 08/22/17 ROOFING CONTRACTOR E-MAILED FRSA |
| TABLES SHOWING PROPOSED UNDERLAYMENT INSTALLATION). |
| |
| 3- TRUSS PACKAGE SUBMITTED: |
| A) DESIGN LOADS DON'T MATCH DESIGN CRITERIA SPECIFIED |
| BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. |
| SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. TRUSS ENGINEER TO SEE DESIGN |
| CRITERIA ON SHEET 2.1 AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| |
| B) BASED ON ITEM #3(A) ABOVE REVISED TRUSS PACKAGE TO |
| BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE ENGINEER OF |
| RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL T THIS OFFICE. SEC. 107.3.4.2 |
| CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| |
| C) TRUSS LAYOUT AND ALL INDIVIDUAL TRUSS DRAWINGS NEED |
| TO BE SIGNED AND SEALED AND HAVE THE TRUSS ENGINEER |
| INFORMATION IN ALL DRAWINGS AS REQUIRED BY FAC |
| 61G15-31.003. |
| RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. |
| |
| ****PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER CLEARLY SPECIFYING |
| HOW EACH COMMENT IS ADDRESSED TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW |
| PROCESS. |
| ***PLEASE INSERT ANY REVISED DRAWING AND REMOVE OLD |
| DRAWING. DON'T STAPLE OLD DRAWINGS. SUBMIT OLD DRAWINGS |
| FOR REFERENCE. |
| |
| IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT |
| JULIO GOMEZ |
| COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| BUILDING DIVISION |
| (561)805-6712 |