Date |
Text |
2017-07-18 18:07:53 | NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (R3) BUILDING REVIEW |
| COMMENTS. |
| CODE: FBC 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| |
| 1- AFTER PLANS ARE REVISED, BRING THEM TO PALM BEACH |
| COUNTY (2300 N. JOG RD.) FOR IMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT. |
| BRING BACK COUNTY STAMPED PLANS AND COPY OF PAID |
| RECEIPT IF FEE IS DUE. COUNTY IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE OF |
| THE UNIFIED LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. |
| |
| 2- SQUARE FOOTAGE ON THE PROJECT AREA ON SHEET 2.1 IS |
| MISSING THE AREA FOR THE COVERED PATIO. REVISE AS |
| REQUIRED. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| |
| 3- PROJECT DATA ON SHEET 2.1 IS MISSING THE ATTIC LIVE |
| LOAD AS REQUIRED BY NOTES "B" AND "G" OF TABLE R301.5 |
| FBC-5TH EDITION (2014). |
| |
| 4- PROVIDE SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE GARAGE DOOR LEADING |
| TO THE GREAT ROOM. DOOR NEEDS SELF CLOSING DEVICE AS |
| REQUIRED BY SEC. R302.5.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| |
| 5- REVISE DIMENSION "A" ON COMPONENTS AND CLADDING |
| INFORMATION ON SHEET 4.1 AND 5.1. ACCORDING TO NOTE ON |
| FIGURE R301.2(7) OF FBC-RESIDENTIAL THE DIMENSION "A" |
| IS 4 FEET IN ALL CASES NOT 3 FEET. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| |
| 6- REVISE GARAGE DOORS DESIGN PRESSURES SHOWN ON SHEET |
| 4.1 AND 5.1. ACCORDING TO NOTES ON PLANS SUBMITTED THE |
| DESIGN PRESSURES SHOWN ARE BASED ON TABLE R301.2(4) |
| FBC-RESIDENTIAL. DESIGN PRESSURES SHOWN DON'T |
| CORRESPOND TO THE REQUIRED DESIGN PRESSURES WHEN THE |
| PRESSURES ARE MULTIPLIED BY THE 1.21 COEFFICIENT TO |
| REPRESENT THE EXPOSURE "C". REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| |
| 7- DRAWINGS 7.1, 8.1 AND 9.1 NEED THE NAME AND |
| SIGNATURE OF THE PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DESIGN AS |
| REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| |
| 8-ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED: |
| A) OWNER OR LEGALLY DESIGNATED AGENT TO CERTIFY AT THE |
| BOTTOM OF FORM AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R103.1.1.2 |
| FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| |
| B) PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION ON TOP OF FORM, |
| INCLUDING OWNER'S NAME, BUILDER'S NAME, PERMIT OFFICE |
| AND JURISDICTION # (604700) AS REQUIRED BY SEC. |
| R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| |
| C) ENERGY CALCULATIONS NEED TO BE DONE FOR THE ACTUAL |
| ORIENTATION OF THE BUILDING NOT WORST CASE. REVISE ITEM |
| #5 AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY |
| CONSERVATION. |
| |
| D) REVISE WALL TYPE ON ITEM #9(B) FOR THE ADJACENT |
| WALL. PLANS CALL FOR METAL FRAMING ON ONE SIDE AND WOOD |
| FRAMING ON THE OTHER SIDE. SEC. 101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY |
| CONSERVATION. |
| |
| E) HEATING INFORMATION SHOWN ON ITEM #13 DOESN'T T |
| MATCH INFORMATION SHOWN ON THE EQUIPMENT SIZING |
| CALCULATIONS. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. SEC. |
| R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| |
| F) CONTRACTOR TO COMPLETE THE ENERGY PERFORMANCE LEVEL |
| (EPL) DISPLAY CARD AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R405.4.3 |
| FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| |
| G) REVISE WALLS AND WINDOWS ORIENTATION SHOWN ON PAGE 3 |
| OF 5. COORDINATE WITH ITEM #8(C) ABOVE. SEC. |
| R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| |
| H) REVISE THE DOORS INFORMATION SHOWN ON PAGE 3 OF 5. |
| WHERE ARE THE INSULATED DOORS?. SEE PLANS AND PRODUCT |
| APPROVALS SUBMITTED. DOORS WITH GLAZING NEED TO BE |
| CONSIDERED IN THE WINDOWS AREA AS REQUIRED BY SEC. |
| R405.5.3.3 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| |
| NOTE: |
| LABEL FOR WINDOWS AND DOORS SHOWING THE U-FACTOR AND |
| SHGC FACTOR SPECIFIED ON ITEM #7 IS REQUIRED WHEN THE |
| ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE NOT USING THE SOFTWARE DEFAULT |
| FACTOR. |
| |
| 9- REVISE LOCATION OF CARBON MONOXIDE ALARMS TO COMPLY |
| WITH SEC. R315.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| |
| 10- REVISE LOCATION OF SMOKE ALARMS TO COMPLY WITH SEC. |
| R314.3 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| |
| 11- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS |
| REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| |
| 12- ROOF TILE UNDERLAYMENT FL11288-R15 SUBMITTED: |
| CLEARLY MARK SPECIFIC UNDERLAYMENT INSTALLATION SHOWING |
| THE DESIGN PRESSURES OF PROPOSED INSTALLATION TO VERIFY |
| COMPLIANCE WITH THE DESIGN PRESSURES OF SEC. R301.1 |
| FBC-RESIDENTIAL. NOTE: SEE PAGES 5,6 AND 7 OF |
| EVALUATION REPORT SUBMITTED. MARK SPECIFIC APPLICATION |
| #. |
| |
| 13- TRUSS PACKAGE SUBMITTED: |
| A) TRUSS LAYOUT DOESN'T MATCH ENGINEER'S OF RECORD ROOF |
| FRAMING PLAN. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. SEC. 107.2.1 |
| CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| |
| B) DESIGN LOADS DON'T MATCH DESIGN CRITERIA SPECIFIED |
| BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. |
| SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| |
| C) COMPLETE TRUSS PACKAGE TO BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED |
| IN WRITING BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL |
| T THIS OFFICE. SEC. 107.3.4.2 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| |
| D) TRUSS LAYOUT AND ALL INDIVIDUAL TRUSS DRAWINGS NEED |
| TO BE SIGNED AND SEALED AND HAVE THE TRUSS ENGINEER |
| INFORMATION IN ALL DRAWINGS AS REQUIRED BY FAC |
| 61G15-31.003. |
| |
| ****PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER CLEARLY SPECIFYING |
| HOW EACH COMMENT IS ADDRESSED TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW |
| PROCESS. |
| ***PLEASE INSERT ANY REVISED DRAWING AND REMOVE OLD |
| DRAWING. DON'T STAPLE OLD DRAWINGS. SUBMIT OLD DRAWINGS |
| FOR REFERENCE. |
| |
| IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT |
| JULIO GOMEZ |
| COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| BUILDING DIVISION |
| (561)805-6712 |
| [email protected] |