| Date |
Text |
| 2017-06-23 10:58:50 | RESIDENTIAL (R2) ALTERATION. SECOND BUILDING REVIEW |
| | CHECKLIST. |
| | CODE: FBC 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 1- SOUND INSULATION MATERIAL SUBMITTED: |
| | A) PROVIDE 2 COPIES OF THE FLAME SPREAD INDEX AND SMOKE |
| | DEVELOPED TEST DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM E 84 OR UL |
| | 723 AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 720.1 OF FBC 5TH EDITION |
| | (2014). |
| | B) PROVIDE 2 COPIES OF THE SOUND TRANSMISSION CLASS |
| | (STC) TEST DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM E 90 AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. 1207.2 OF FBC 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | NOTE: TEST SAMPLE TO MATCH ACTUAL BUILDING |
| | CONSTRUCTION. TECHNICAL DATA SUBMITTED SHOWS THAT THE |
| | TESTS WERE CONDUCTED ON 8" CONCRETE SLAB WITH |
| | ACOUSTICAL CEILING. THIS ASSEMBLY DOESN'T MATCH THE |
| | ASSEMBLY ON THIS BUILDING. THIS BUILDING HAS A 7" |
| | CONCRETE SLAB AND THERE IS NO ACOUSTICAL CEILING. THERE |
| | ARE TESTS FOR 6" CONCRETE SLABS WITHOUT ACOUSTICAL |
| | CEILING. PROVIDE INFORMATION THAT MORE CLOSELY MATCHES |
| | THIS BUILDING ASSEMBLY. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE TO ITEMS (A) AND (B) ABOVE: |
| | ALL TESTS SUBMITTED ARE FOR 8" CONCRETE SLAB WITH |
| | ACOUSTICAL CEILING. THAT'S WHY THE RESULTS ARE SO HIGH. |
| | THIS BUILDING HAS A 7" CONCRETE SLAB AND THERE IS NO |
| | ACOUSTICAL CEILING. SUBMIT COPIES FOR TESTS DONE ON THE |
| | TYPE OF ASSEMBLY THAT CLOSELY MATCHES THIS BUILDING |
| | ASSEMBLY. REPEAT COMMENT. |
| | |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | C) PROVIDE 2 COPIES OF THE IMPACT INSULATION CLASS |
| | (IIC) TEST DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM E 492 AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. 1207.3 OF FBC 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | NOTE: TEST SAMPLE TO MATCH ACTUAL BUILDING |
| | CONSTRUCTION. TECHNICAL DATA SUBMITTED SHOWS THAT THE |
| | TESTS WERE CONDUCTED ON 8" CONCRETE SLAB WITH |
| | ACOUSTICAL CEILING. THIS ASSEMBLY DOESN'T MATCH THE |
| | ASSEMBLY ON THIS BUILDING. THIS BUILDING HAS A 7" |
| | CONCRETE SLAB AND THERE IS NO ACOUSTICAL CEILING. THERE |
| | ARE TESTS FOR 6" CONCRETE SLABS WITHOUT ACOUSTICAL |
| | CEILING. PROVIDE INFORMATION THAT MORE CLOSELY MATCHES |
| | THIS BUILDING ASSEMBLY. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | NO INFORMATION WAS SUBMITTED. REPEAT COMMENT. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 2- VALUATION DECLARED IN THE PERMIT APPLICATION IS TOO |
| | LOW. VALUATION TO INCLUDE ALL LABOR, MATERIALS AND |
| | CONTRACTOR'S OVERHEAD AND PROFIT AS REQUIRED BY SEC. |
| | 109.3 CITY AMENDMENTS. NOTE: PROVIDE COPY OF SIGNED |
| | CONTRACT FOR ALL SCOPE OF WORK TO BE DONE FOR BUILDING |
| | OFFICIAL APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | IT LOOKS LIKE THE ESTIMATE SUBMITTED IS ONLY FOR |
| | INSTALLATION AND OWNER IS SUPPLYING THE MATERIALS. NEED |
| | TO INCLUDE THE COST OF ALL MATERIALS IN THE VALUATION. |
| | |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
