| Date |
Text |
| 2017-05-31 11:16:24 | PLAN |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | |
| | 1ST REVIEW: FBC FIFTH EDITION (2014) |
| | ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561) 805-6714 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | DENIED BY BUILDING |
| | PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW: |
| | |
| | 1) A SECTION OF THIS STRUCTURE HAS A SECOND FLOOR WITH |
| | A MEAN ROOF HEIGHT OF 25 FEET. THEREFORE, THE MEAN ROOF |
| | HEIGHT FOR THE RE-ROOFING IS 25 FEET. FBC 107.2.1 |
| | |
| | 2) THIS PROJECT IS LOCATED IN EXPOSURE D WITH A 132 MPH |
| | VASD WINDSPEED. THE ROOF PITCH IS 5/12 AND THE MEAN |
| | ROOF HEIGHT IS 25 FEET. THE UPLIFT IN ROOF ZONE THREE |
| | (CORNERS) IS 119 PSF. INDICATE THE UNDERLAYMENT |
| | INSTALLATION METHOD AND IT'S MAXIMUM DESIGN PRESSURE |
| | FROM THE ONES LISTED IN THE PRODCUT APPROVAL. SEE |
| | SECTION 5.6.4 ON PAGE 6 OF PRODUCT APPROVAL FL5259-R25. |
| | FBC-R301.1 |
| | |
| | 3) THE MITIGATION LETTER SHOULD BE SIGNED BY THE |
| | QUALIFIER (LICENSED CONTRACTOR) FOR THE COMPANY. |
| | HOWEVER, IN THIS CASE YOU WILL NEED TO RE-EVALUATE YOUR |
| | LETTER. THE SECOND FLOOR PORTION OF THE STRUCTURE WAS |
| | ADDED IN 1996 AND COMPLIES WITH SECTION 708.8.1 OF THE |
| | EXISTING BUILDING CODE FOR ROOF TO WALL CONNECTIONS. |
| | THE ONE STORY PORTION OF THE STRUCTURE WAS BUILT IN |
| | 1960 AND MAY NOT MEET THE ROOF TO WALL CONNECTION |
| | REQUIREMENTS. THEREFORE, ONLY THE GABLE END OF THE |
| | LOWER ROOF WOULD NEED TO BE EVALUATED AND RETROFITTED |
| | FOR ROOF TO WALL CONNECTIONS. SEE FBC EXISTING BUILDING |
| | SECTION 708.8.1.3 OR 708.8.1.4 FOR THE PRESCRIPTIVE |
| | METHOD FOR ATTACHMENT OF THE RAFTERS OR TRUSSES FOR |
| | GABLE ROOFS ON WOOD FRAME OR MASONRY WALLS WITHIN 6 |
| | FEET OF THE CORNERS. |
