| Date |
Text |
| 2017-07-06 17:38:03 | NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (R3) SECOND BUILDING REVIEW |
| | CHECKLIST. |
| | CODE: FBC 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | |
| | |
| | NOTE: |
| | BUILDING REVIEW MAY BE APPROVED WITH PROVISO. PROVISO |
| | MEANS THAT CONTRACTOR AGREES TO SUBMIT THE REQUIRED |
| | INFORMATION AFTER THE PERMIT IS ISSUED BUT BEFORE |
| | INSPECTIONS TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. REVISION FEES |
| | WILL APPLY. CONTRACTOR TO ADVICE IN WRITING IF PROVISO |
| | OPTION IS PREFERRED AT THIS TIME. PERMIT WILL BE |
| | PROCESSED ONCE THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE SIGNED BY |
| | THE OWNER AND THE IMPACT FEE COUNTY STAMP ON PLANS AND |
| | COPY OF PAID FEES ARE SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | |
| | 1- AREA CALCULATION ON SHEET A-1 IS INCORRECT. REVISE |
| | AS REQUIRED. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | RESPONSE: GARAGE AREA IS INCORRECT AND THE TOTAL AREA |
| | IS INCORRECT ALSO. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 2-ENLARGED SURVEY SUBMITTED NEEDS THE ORIGINAL SEAL AND |
| | SIGNATURE OF THE SURVEYOR AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 472 |
| | FLORIDA STATUTE. NOTE: ENGINEER OF RECORD SIGNED AND |
| | SEALED THE SURVEY. HE CAN NOT SIGN AND SEAL THE SURVEY |
| | IF IT WAS NOT DONE BY HIM. FAC 61G15-23.002. |
| | RESPONSE: NO SURVEY OR SITE PLAN WAS SUBMITTED AT THIS |
| | TIME. NEED SURVEY OR SITE PLANS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. |
| | 107.3.5.3 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 3- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO SPECIFY CARBON MONOXIDE ALARMS |
| | ON PLANS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R315 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | RESPONSE: ENGINEER TO CHECK SEC. R315 FBC-RESIDENTIAL |
| | AND REVISE ALARM LOCATION ON PLANS AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 4- WINDOW AND DOOR BUCK DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS |
| | SHOWN ON SHEET A-1: BEVELED BUCKS ARE NOT ALLOWED AND |
| | THE BUCK NEEDS TO PROVIDE FULL SUPPORT TO THE WINDOW |
| | AND DOOR FRAME. REVISE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS AS |
| | REQUIRED TO SHOW COMPLIANCE. SEC. R612.7.2.1 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | RESPONSE: DETAILS ON SHEET A-1 SPECIFY BEVELED BUCK AND |
| | NEED TO PROVIDE FULL SUPPORT TO THE DOOR FRAME. SEE |
| | DOORS PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR SIZE OF DOOR FRAME AND |
| | REVISE BUCK SIZE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 5- REVISE ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED: |
| | ENGINEER OF RECORD RESPONSE LETTER STATED THE |
| | FOLLOWING; " FORMS AND CALCULATIONS ARE IN PROCESS OF |
| | SUBSTANTIAL REVISIONS BY OTHERS. THEREFORE, AT THIS |
| | TIME IT IS REQUESTED THAT THE SUBJECT IS DEFERRED FOR A |
| | REASONABLE TIME". |
| | RESPONSE: NEED REVISED ENERGY CALCULATIONS SIGNED BY |
| | THE OWNER OR LEGALLY DESIGNATED AGENT ARE REQUIRED |
| | PRIOR TO RECEIVING THE PERMIT AS REQUIRED BY SEC. |
| | R103.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | A) AFTER THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE REVISED, THE OWNER |
| | NEEDS TO CERTIFY AT THE BOTTOM OF THE FORM AS REQUIRED |
| | BY SEC. R103.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION |
| | (2014). |
| | RESPONSE: NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | B) PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION ON TOP OF FORM, |
| | INCLUDING THE OWNER NAME, PERMIT OFFICE AND |
| | JURISDICTION NUMBER (604700) . SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 |
| | FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | RESPONSE: NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | C) ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED ARE DONE FOR THE WORST |
| | CASE SCENARIO. ENERGY CALCULATIONS NEED TO BE DONE FOR |
| | THE ACTUAL ORIENTATION OF THE BUILDING. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | RESPONSE: NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | D) ITEM #9 IS MISSING THE INFORMATION ABOUT THE |
| | ADJACENT WALL SEPARATING THE GARAGE FROM THE MAIN |
| | HOUSE. PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 |
| | FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | RESPONSE: NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | RESPONSE: NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | E) THE TYPE AND MATERIALS OF THE ROOF INFORMATION ON |
| | PAGE 2 OF 4 IS INCORRECT. SEE PLANS AND PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS AND REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. SEC. |
| | R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | RESPONSE: NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | F) DOORS INFORMATION ON PAGE 3 OF 4 IS INCORRECT. SEC. |
| | R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. WHERE ARE THE |
| | INSULATED DOORS. ALSO, SIZE OF DOORS DON'T MATCH PLANS. |
| | SEE PLANS AND PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED AND REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED TO MATCH. |
| | RESPONSE: NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | G) DOORS WITH GLASS NEED TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE WINDOW |
| | AREA AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R405.5.3.3 FBC-ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION. SEE PLANS AND PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED |
| | AND REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. |
| | RESPONSE: NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | H) REVISE THE WINDOWS INFORMATION ON PAGE 3 OF 4. THE |
| | OVERHANG SEPARATION DOESN'T MATCH PLANS. SEE PLANS AND |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 |
| | FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | RESPONSE: NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | I) SINCE THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS (ITEM #7) ARE USING |
| | WINDOWS WITH A U-FACTOR AND SHGC FACTOR OTHER THAN THE |
| | DEFAULT FACTOR, THEN PROVIDE MANUFACTURER'S |
| | SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING THE CALCULATED FACTORS FOR ALL |
| | DOORS AND WINDOWS. NOTE: LABEL ON THE WINDOWS AND DOORS |
| | WILL BE REQUIRED AT TIME OF INSPECTION. |
| | SEC. R405.3 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | RESPONSE: NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | ****ADD NOTE ON PROVISO FOR INSPECTOR TO CHECK THE |
| | ENGINEER'S DRAINAGE PROPOSAL. |
| | |
| | NOTES: |
| | *****PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER CLEARLY ADDRESSING |
| | EACH COMMENT TO HELP EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. |
| | ****PLEASE INSERT ANY REVISED DRAWING AND REMOVE OLD |
| | DRAWING. DON'T STAPLE OLD DRAWINGS. SUBMIT OLD DRAWINGS |
| | FOR REFERENCE. |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
