Date |
Text |
2017-03-08 14:02:12 | PERMIT #17021038 |
| REVIEW COMMENTS - FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| |
| FAILED COMMENTS: |
| |
| 1) THE DRAWINGS SUBMITTED ARE ONLY FOR THE ELECTRICAL |
| WORK DONE ON THIS PROJECT. THERE IS NO SPECIFIC |
| REFERENCE TO THE ACCESS CONTROL EXCEPT FOR SHEET E1.0 |
| THAT INDICATES THAT THE CARD READERS ARE INSTALLED BY |
| OTHERS. PLEASE INDICATE WHERE YOUR SCOPE OF WORK |
| RELATES TO THE ACCESS CONTROL THAT IS BEING PROPOSED. |
| IF THE ACCESS CONTROL IS INSTALLED BY "OTHERS" THAT |
| ENTITY IS THE ONE SHOULD BE APPLYING FOR THE PERMIT. |
| |
| 2) INDICATE ALL NEW OR EXISTING DOORS THAT ARE EQUIPPED |
| WITH ELECTROMAGNETIC HARDWARE. INTERLOCK WITH THE |
| SPRINKLER AND FIRE ALARM SYSTEM SHALL BE NOTED ON THE |
| LIFE SAFETY PLANS, FIRE ALARM PLANS AND ACCESS CONTROL |
| PLANS. |
| |
| 3) ACCESS CONTROLLED EGRESS DOORS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL |
| SEVEN REQUIREMENTS LISTED IN SECTION 7.2.1.6.2 OF NFPA |
| 101 FLORIDA EDITION, 2012. INTERLOCK WITH THE SPRINKLER |
| AND FIRE ALARM SYSTEM SHALL BE REFERENCED ON THE LIFE |
| SAFETY PLANS AND ELECTRICAL FIRE ALARM SYSTEM DRAWINGS. |
| |
| PER SECTION 7.2.1.6.2, ACCESS-CONTROLLED EGRESS DOORS |
| ARE PERMITTED PROVIDED THAT ALL SEVEN OF THE FOLLOWING |
| CRITERIA ARE MET: |
| 1. A SENSOR SHALL BE PROVIDED ON THE EGRESS SIDE, |
| ARRANGED TO DETECT AN OCCUPANT APPROACHING DOORS THAT |
| ARE ARRANGED TO UNLOCK IN THE DIRECTION OF EGRESS UPON |
| DETECTION OF AN APPROACHING OCCUPANT OR LOSS OF POWER |
| TO THE SENSOR. |
| 2. LOSS OF POWER TO THE PART OF THE ACCESS CONTROL |
| SYSTEM THAT LOCKS THE DOORS SHALL AUTOMATICALLY UNLOCK |
| THE DOORS IN THE DIRECTION OF EGRESS. |
| 3. THE DOORS SHALL BE ARRANGED TO UNLOCK IN THE |
| DIRECTION OF EGRESS FROM A MANUAL RELEASE DEVICE |
| LOCATED VERTICALLY 40 TO 48 INCHES ABOVE THE FLOOR AND |
| WITHIN 60 INCHES HORIZONTALLY OF THE SECURED DOORS. |
| 4. THE MANUAL RELEASE DEVICE SHALL BE READILY |
| ACCESSIBLE AND CLEARLY IDENTIFIED BY A SIGN THAT READS |
| PUSH TO EXIT. |
| 5. WHEN OPERATED, THE MANUAL RELEASE DEVICE SHALL |
| RESULT IN DIRECT INTERRUPTION OF POWER TO THE LOCK, |
| INDEPENDENT OF THE ACCESS CONTROL SYSTEM ELECTRONICS, |
| AND THE DOORS SHALL REMAIN UNLOCKED FOR NOT LESS THAN |
| 30 SECONDS. |
| 6. ACTIVATION OF THE BUILDING FIRE ALARM SYSTEM SHALL |
| AUTOMATICALLY UNLOCK THE DOORS IN THE DIRECTION OF |
| EGRESS, AND THE DOORS SHALL REMAIN UNLOCKED UNTIL THE |
| FIRE ALARM SYSTEM HAS BEEN MANUALLY RESET. |
| 7. ACTIVATION OF THE BUILDING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER |
| SYSTEM OR AUTOMATIC DETECTION SYSTEM SHALL |
| AUTOMATICALLY UNLOCK THE DOORS IN THE DIRECTION OF |
| EGRESS, AND THE DOORS SHALL REMAIN UNLOCKED UNTIL THE |
| FIRE ALARM SYSTEM HAS BEEN MANUALLY RESET. |
| |
| PER SECTION 7.2.1.5.5, ELECTRICALLY CONTROLLED EGRESS |
| DOOR ASSEMBLIES ARE PERMITTED IF EQUIPPED WITH APPROVED |
| LISTED HARDWARE THAT INCORPORATES A BUILT-IN SWITCH AND |
| THE FOLLOWING FIVE CRITERIA ARE MET: |
| 1. THE HARDWARE FOR OCCUPANT RELEASE OF THE LOCK IS |
| AFFIXED TO THE DOOR LEAF. |
| 2. THE HARDWARE HAS AN OBVIOUS METHOD OF OPERATION THAT |
| IS READILY OPERATED IN THE DIRECTION OF EGRESS. |
| 3. THE HARDWARE IS CAPABLE OF BEING OPERATED WITH ONE |
| HAND IN THE DIRECTION OF EGRESS. |
| 4. OPERATION OF THE HARDWARE INTERRUPTS THE POWER |
| SUPPLY DIRECTLY TO THE ELECTRIC LOCK AND UNLOCKS THE |
| DOOR ASSEMBLY IN THE DIRECTION OF EGRESS. |
| 5. LOSS OF POWER TO THE HARDWARE AUTOMATICALLY UNLOCKS |
| THE DOOR ASSEMBLY IN THE DIRECTION OF EGRESS. |
| NOTE: THESE REQUIREMENTS ARE DIFFERENT THAN THE |
| REQUIREMENTS OF FOR MAGNETIC LOCKS WHEREBY AN OCCUPANT |
| SENSOR AND PUSH TO EXIT BUTTON ARE NEEDED IN ON THE |
| EGRESS SIDE. |
| |
| |
| |
| SUE ELLEN CALDERON |
| ASSISTANT FIRE MARSHAL |
| OFFICE OF THE FIRE MARSHAL |
| WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE |
| [email protected] |
| (561) 644-7326 |
| |