Date |
Text |
2017-03-23 17:57:40 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| |
| SAMANTHA HILL |
| BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| [email protected] |
| 561-805-6724 |
| |
| FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 5TH EDITION (2014) |
| FBC B = FBC BUILDING |
| FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING |
| FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY |
| FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION |
| |
| 1. ALS1.1 LIFE SAFETY REQUIREMENTS STATES THAT SF AREA |
| IS 2367, BUT IT APPEARS THAT AN ADDITION IS PROPOSED. |
| REVISE PLAN TO SHOW EXISTING SF AREA, PROPOSED NEW, NEW |
| TOTAL; AREA SUMMARY SHOULD INCLUDE BOTH UNDER AIR AND |
| OUTDOOR CALCS SEPARATELY, AREA SUMMARY SHOULD INCLUDE |
| MEZZANINE, FBC 107, FBC EB CHAPTER 11. |
| |
| 2. ALS1.1 STATES THIS IS A CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY. OUR |
| RECORDS APPEAR TO SHOW THE HISTORY OF THIS STRUCTURE AS |
| CONSTRUCTED AS A RESTAURANT WITH CONTINUED USE AS A |
| RESTAURANT. EITHER REVISE TO REMOVE CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY |
| DESIGNATION, OR CLARIFY BY INCLUDING EXISTING OCCUPANCY |
| AND SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF FBC EB |
| CHAPTER 10 AS APPLICABLE. |
| |
| 3. THIS APPEARS TO INCLUDE AN ADDITION; REVISE TO |
| INCLUDE THIS INFORMATION, FBC EB CHAPTER 11. AN |
| ACCURATE PLAN REVIEW WITH CORRECT CODE REFERENCES |
| CANNOT BE DONE AT THIS TIME. THEREFORE, A GENERAL PLAN |
| REVIEW WILL BE PERFORMED. |
| |
| 4. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE SURVEY FOR THIS PROPERTY, FBC |
| 107, FBC B TABLE 602, TABLE 705.8. |
| |
| 5. FBC B 1008.2, 1008.1.10, OCCUPANT LOAD THAT THE GATE |
| SERVES IS NOT CLEAR. EXIT STRATEGY NOT CLEAR. IT |
| APPEARS THAT TWO EXITS ARE REQUIRED, BUT THE REAR EXIT |
| DOOR APPEARS TO ROUTE THE OCCUPANT TO THE FRONT EXIT. |
| |
| REVISE PLAN TO SHOW THE TWO EXITS REQUIRED, CONTINUOUS |
| TO THE PUBLIC WAY. IF THE PLAN IS NOT REVISED TO |
| INCLUDE THE PATIO GATE AS HAVING PANIC BARS AND |
| UTILIZED AS THE SECOND EXIT, SEND THE PROPOSED LIFE |
| SAFETY PLAN VIA EMAIL FOR PRELIMINARY REVIEW. |
| |
| 6. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE CONTRACT FOR THIS JOB, FBC |
| 109. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE COST BREAKDOWN FOR THIS JOB. |
| VALUE IS TO INCLUDE LABOR, MATERIALS, OVERHEAD, PROFIT, |
| DESIGN FEES, EVEN IF PROVIDED BY OTHERS. VALUE APPEARS |
| TOO LOW. |
| |
| 7. FBC A 220.1.1, IT APPEARS THAT INTENT IS THAT |
| VERTICAL ACCESSIBILITY WILL NOT BE PROVIDED TO THE |
| MEZZANINE. REVISE PLAN TO CLARIFY UNDER WHICH EXEMPTION |
| THIS FALLS. REVISE PLAN TO CLARIFY THAT THE PROPOSED |
| SPACE MEETS ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF SELECTED |
| EXEMPTION(S). |
| |
| 8. NO EXIT SIGNS ARE SHOWN IN THE PATIO; REVISE TO ADD, |
| FBC 1011.1. |
| |
| 9. FBC 1003.6, SOFT SEATING 101 TO PATIO, FBC B 1003.6, |
| IT IS NOT CLEAR IF THE FOLDING DOOR COMPLIES WITH THE |
| REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTER 10. FBC B 1004.5, B 1027.1, IT |
| APPEARS THAT THE OCCUPANT, AFTER BEING DIRECTED TO THE |
| REAR EXIT DOOR, IS FORCED TO REENTER THE BUILDING. |
| |
| 10. FBC B CHAPTER 2, 505, THE PROPOSED MEZZANINE DOES |
| NOT APPEAR TO MEET THE DEFINITION OF A MEZZANINE; |
| REVISE. |
| |
| 11. FBC 107, ACCESS TO PROPOSED MEZZANINE, REVISE PLAN |
| TO INCORPORATE EXCEPTIONS. |
| |
| 12. FBC A 902, 904, REVISE PLAN TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH |
| DINING SURFACE REQUIREMENTS. |
| |
| 13. PRODUCT APPROVAL REQUIRED FOR COMPONENTS AND |
| CLADDING, INCLUDING THE ROOF HATCH, FBC B 1609. THIS |
| MAY BE SUBMITTED AS A REVISION AFTER PERMIT ISSUANCE, |
| PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE TO BE |
| REVIEWED BY DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL, FBC |
| 107. |
| |
| 14. ACCESSIBLE ROUTE FROM THE PARKING SPACE TO THE |
| ALTERED AREA NOT CLEAR; REVISE PLAN TO CLARIFY, FBC A |
| 202.3, CHAPTER 4. |
| |