Date |
Text |
2018-05-07 06:24:09 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| |
| SAMANTHA HILL |
| BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| [email protected] |
| 561-805-6724 |
| |
| FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 5TH EDITION (2014) |
| FBC B = FBC BUILDING |
| FBC R = FBC RESIDENTIAL |
| FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING |
| FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY |
| FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION |
| |
| BANYAN CAY FOUR STORY HOTEL |
| ***THRESHOLD BUILDING***, POST TENSION 6"-8" SLABS, FRT |
| TRUSSES, TYPE IIA |
| ARCHITECT - ADACHE GROUP ARCHITECTS, DANIEL E. ADACHE |
| AR7073 |
| ENGINEER - MUE ENGINEERS, INC (29348), MARCUS O. |
| UNTERWEGER, PE63860 |
| MEP - TLC ENGINEERING |
| MECHANICAL - JORGE E. REYES, PE54904 |
| ELECTRICAL - RALPH BAEZA, PE42641 |
| PLUMBING - JORGE E. REYES, PE54904 |
| |
| |
| 1. OK |
| |
| 2. COMMENT FROM FIRST REVIEW: A1.2.01 EXIT DISCHARGE |
| NOT CLEAR; REVISE PLAN TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC B |
| 1027. |
| |
| 2ND REVIEW, RESPONSE LETTER STATES THAT FBC B 1027 |
| REFERENCES "EXTERIOR EXIT STARIWAYS AND RAMPS" AND |
| GIVES SOME EXPLANATION ABOUT ALL STAIRS BEING INTERIOR |
| STAIRS. |
| |
| THE FBC 2014 BUILDING, SECTION 1027, IS TITLED "EXIT |
| DISCHARGE". SECTION 1022 IS INTERIOR STAIRS AND RAMPS. |
| SEE PREVIOUS COMMENT; REFERENCE WAS TO FBC B 1027, NOT |
| FBC B 1022, AND SPECIFICALLY REFERENCES "EXIT |
| DISCHARGE". IT IS NOT CLEAR WHY RESPONSE LETTER |
| EXPLAINS SOMETHING UNRELATED. |
| |
| SEE FBC 1027.5, EXIT DISCHARGE SHALL PROVIDE A DIRECT |
| AND UNOBSTRUCTED ACCESS TO A PUBLIC WAY, SEE ALSO |
| EXCEPTIONS. ALSO SEE COMMENT #3. SHEET A1.2.00 APPEARS |
| TO SHOW COMPLIANCE EXCEPT AS NOTED IN OTHER COMMENTS, |
| BUT INFORMATION REGARDING ACCESSIBILITY AND SLOPES NOT |
| PROVIDED. |
| |
| COMPLIANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS FOR EXIT DISCHARGE |
| ILLUMINATION NOT CLEAR; THIS PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED WITH |
| PROVISO, COMPLIANCE WITH FBC B 1006 REQUIRED. |
| |
| FIRST FLOOR LIFE SAFETY PLAN A1.2.01 IS NOT CLEAR ON |
| NUMBER OF OCCUPANTS IN EACH ROOM AS A SUMMARY WAS |
| PROVIDED. IT APPEARS THAT EXIT CAPACITY IS ADEQUATE FOR |
| EACH AREA, BUT COMPLIANCE WITH REQUIREMENT FOR EXIT |
| DISCHARGE IS NOT CLEAR. |
| |
| FOR INSTANCE: THE PATH AT THE LEFT OF THE SITE LIFE |
| SAFETY PLAN INDICATES "146 OCCUPANTS". FIRST FLOOR |
| SHOWS 146 OCCUPANTS EXITING FROM THE STAIR AND EXIT |
| CORRIDOR. BUT NO OCCUPANT LOAD WAS PROVIDED FOR MEETING |
| ROOM #1, BALLROOM #1, ETC. WHICH ALSO TRAVEL ALONG THE |
| SAME PATH IN THE EXIT DISCHARGE. A SUMMARY FOR EACH |
| OCCUPANCY WAS PROVIDED, BUT AS THE OCCUPANCIES ARE IN |
| DIFFERENT AREAS OF THE BUILDING, THE NUMBER USING THE |
| GRAPHICALLY DEPICTED EXIT DISCHARGE IS NOT CLEAR. |
| |
| THE CIVIL PAGES INCLUDE ELEMENTS IN THE EXIT DISCHARGE |
| WHICH ARE NOT SHOWN ON THE LIFE SAFETY SHEETS (APPEARS |
| TO BE FENCES, GATES). PLEASE CORRELATE. FOR INSTANCE, |
| CIVIL PAGE 2 OF 9 MASTER PLAN) WHICH SHOWS GATES IN THE |
| MEANS OF EGRESS, AND THE SITE LIFE SAFETY PLAN A1.2.00. |
| PLEASE CORRELATE AND NOTE THAT ALL GATES WILL INCLUDE |
| PANIC HARDWARE (PER FBC B 1008.2. NO INFORMATION WAS |
| PROVIDED REGARDING THE WIDTH OF THESE ELEMENTS. |
| |
| THE ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN E1.1.01 APPEARS TO CONFLICT |
| WITH THE EXIT DISCHARGE (GENERATOR, OTHER ITEMS); |
| PLEASE CORRELATE. IF THEY DO NOT CONLICT PROVIDE ENOUGH |
| DIMENSIONS ON THE PLAN TO SHOW THAT THE GENERATOR IS |
| NOT INTERFEREING WITH THE HATCHED EXIT DISCHARGE SHOWN |
| ON OTHER SHEETS. |
| |
| ADVISORY ONLY; THE LANDSCAPE PLANS APPEAR TO CONFLICT |
| WITH THE EXIT DISCHARGE. LANDSCAPE PERMIT REQUIRES A |
| SEPARATE SUBMITTAL; PERMIT APPLICATION, FEES, AND PLANS |
| AND ARE NOT REVIEWED BY BUILDING. |
| |
| ON THE ELECTRICAL PAGES, I WAS NOT ABLE TO LOCATE VOICE |
| EVAC. SHEET E2.1.01 SHOWS A FIRE ALARM CONTROL PANEL, |
| DETAILS ON E3.1.02, BUT I WAS UNABLE TO LOCATE THE |
| LABEL "EVAC" ON THE FLOOR PLANS (PER ELECTRICAL LEGEND) |
| AND E3.1.02 WAS NOT CLEAR. PLEASE DIRECT WHERE THIS |
| INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND OR CLARIFY INTENT. NOTE THAT |
| FBC B 1005.3.1 REQUIRES .3" PER OCCUPANT, BUT .2" WAS |
| USED PER EXCEPTION. |
| |
| 3. COMMENT FROM FIRST REVIEW: ACCESSIBLE MEANS OF |
| EGRESS SELECTED NOT CLEAR; SEE FBC 1007, FBC A 207.1. |
| REVISE PLAN TO STATE WHICH METHOD IS SELECTED AND |
| CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WITH METHOD SELECTED; REVISE PLAN IF |
| NECESSARY TO SHOW COMPLIANCE. |
| |
| 2ND REVIEW, RESPONSE LETTER GIVES INFORMATION REGARDING |
| STAIRS. THIS DOES NOT ADDRESS THE COMMENT. |
| |
| FBC B 1007 REFERS TO FBC A 207.1. |
| FBC A 207.1 MEANS OF EGRESS SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTION |
| 1003.2.13 OF THE INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE 2000 AND |
| 2001 SUPPLEMENT OR SECTION 1007 OF THE INTERNATIONAL |
| BUILDING CODE 2003 EDITION. COMPLIANCE WITH ONE OF |
| THESE TWO METHODS OF COMPLIANCE IS NOT CLEAR; |
| PARTICULARLY THE EXIT DISCHARGE (SEE ALSO IBC 2003 |
| 1007.2). |
| |
| THIS ITEM HAS NOT BEEN REVIEWED. |
| |
| AS THE FINISHED FLOOR AFFECTS THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE, |
| EXIT DISCHARGE, AND ACCESSIBLE EXIT DISCHARGE, |
| COMPLIANCE SHOULD BE DEMONSTRATED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF |
| A FOUNDATION PERMIT - RESOLUTION TO COMMENTS #2 AND #3 |
| NEED TO BE RESOLVED PRIOR TO FOUNDATION PERMIT |
| ISSUANCE. |
| |
| APPLICANT MAY SEND AN EMAIL EXPLAINING COMPLIANCE AND |
| HOW THIS WILL BE ADDRESSED UPON RESUBMITTAL TO GET THIS |
| ISSUE RESOLVED PRIOR TO REVIEW OF FOUNDATION PERMIT. |
| |
| 4-6. OK |
| |
| 7. COMMENT FROM FIRST REVIEW: A1.4.01B, FITNESS ROOM TO |
| COMPLY WITH FBC A 1004, REVISE TO SHOW COMPLIANCE. |
| |
| IF DETAILS SUCH AS SPECIFIC TYPES OF MACHINES PROPOSED |
| IS NOT AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME, REVISE THE PLAN TO SHOW |
| GENERAL COMPLIANCE. INCLUDE NOTES REGARDING COMPLIANCE. |
| THIS PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED WITH PROVISO, ISSUED AT |
| CONTRACTOR'S RISK, PROVIDE A DETAILED PLAN AT |
| INSPECTION. SUBJECT TO FIELD INSPECTOR'S DISCRETION, |
| FITNESS CENTER PLAN MAY BE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED FOR |
| PLAN REVIEW. |
| |
| 2ND REVIEW, CLEAR FLOOR SPACE WAS ADDED BUT IS ALMOST |
| ILLEGIBLE. PLEASE DARKEN THESE LINES, AT LEAST TO THE |
| GREY VALUE OF THE EQUIPENT. IT'S ABOUT .25 DARKNESS OF |
| THE EQUIPMENT WHICH IS ABOUT .5 COMPARED TO THE |
| BLACKLINES. |
| |
| I WAS UNABLE TO LOCATE NOTES REGARDING COMPLIANCE; |
| PLEASE ADD NOTE OR PROVIDE ALL INFORMATION FOR REVIEW. |
| |
| 8. OK |
| |
| 9. ADVISORY; ENGINEER ADDED A NOTE RE: FRT FOR ALL |
| WOOD. SEE SHEET S2.02A-R, PORTE COCHERE ROOF FRAMING |
| NOTES, HEAVY TIMBER FRAMING PROPOSED. PLEASE NOTE THAT |
| THIS IS ALSO REQUIRED TO BE FRT; PLAN HAS BEEN REDLINED |
| IN THIS AND OTHER LOCATIONS. |
| |
| 10-11. OK |
| |
| 12. COMMENT FROM FIRST REVIEW: SOIL BEARING VALUES. THE |
| TEST BY UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES REFERENCES THE |
| TEST IS PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT |
| BANYAN CAY- HOTEL PLEASE NOTE THE BORING SAMPLES TAKEN |
| CH-1 AND CH-2 ARE SHOWN FOR THE CLUBHOUSE, THIS SOILS |
| REPORT HAS NO BORINGS SHOWN IN THE REPORT FOR THE |
| HOTEL. NOTE FOR THE TENNIS CLUB CENTER UP TO 6 FEET OF |
| MUCK WAS ENCOUNTERED WITHIN THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT. |
| PLEASE COMPLY WITH: 2014 FBC-B 1803.3 BASIS OF |
| INVESTIGATION. |
| SOIL CLASSIFICATION SHALL BE BASED ON OBSERVATION AND |
| ANY NECESSARY TESTS OF THE MATERIALS DISCLOSED BY |
| BORINGS, TEST PITS OR OTHER SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION MADE |
| IN APPROPRIATE LOCATIONS. ADDITIONAL STUDIES SHALL BE |
| MADE AS NECESSARY TO EVALUATE SLOPE STABILITY, SOIL |
| STRENGTH, POSITION AND ADEQUACY OF LOAD-BEARING SOILS, |
| THE EFFECT OF MOISTURE VARIATION ON SOIL-BEARING |
| CAPACITY, COMPRESSIBILITY, LIQUEFACTION AND |
| EXPANSIVENESS. |
| |
| 2ND REVIEW, NOT ADDRESSED. ENGINEER OF RECORD IS TO |
| REVIEW THE SOILS, EITHER WITH A SHOP DRAWING REVIEW |
| STAMP OR BY INCORPORATING A REFERENCE INTO THE PLAN. |
| THE SOILS REPORT WAS PROVIDED FOR THE FOUNDATION PERMIT |
| APPLICATION (17010911). AFTER THE FOUNDATION PERMIT IS |
| ISSUED, THE SOILS WILL BE PUBLIC RECORD AND IS NOT |
| NEEDED FOR THIS PERMIT. IF YOU RESUBMIT PRIOR TO |
| ISSUANCE OF FOUNDATION PERMIT, PLEASE INCLUDE IN YOUR |
| RESUBMITTAL. |
| |
| 13-15. OK |
| |
| |
| 16. SEE FBC A 209.2.1, 209.4, LABEL ALL PASSENGER |
| LOADING ZONES ON THE PLAN, REVISE PLAN TO SHOW |
| COMPLIANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS. |
| |
| 2ND REVIEW, PLEASE SUBMIT REQUEST FOR AN ALTERNATE |
| DESIGN TO BE ACCEPTED VIA EMAIL. THE LETTER SHOULD |
| INCLUDE A PLAN SHOWING WHAT IS PROPOSED ALONG WITH THE |
| HOTEL SOP FOR THE LOADING ZONE ALONG WITH RATIONALE. |
| |
| 17-24. OK |
| |
| 25. COMMENT FROM FIRST REVIEW: SHEET A5.1.04 IS BLANK, |
| FBC 107 PROVIDE INFORMATION INCLUDING PANIC HARDWARE |
| FBC B 1008.1.10. |
| |
| 2ND REVIEW: A5.1.04 HAS BEEN UPDATED, BUT REFERS TO |
| HARDWARE SETS. HARDWARE SETS ARE DESCRIBED ON SHEET |
| A5.1.05. A SEARCH OF THE WORD "PANIC" AND "FIRE" |
| YIELDED NO RESULTS. |
| |
| TO EXPEDITE PLAN REVIEW: IF AN ADDITIONAL COLUMN WITH |
| "PANIC BAR" OR "FIRE EXIT HARDWARE" IS ADDED, AND A |
| MARK TO INDICATE WHICH DOORS WILL HAVE PANIC BARS, IN |
| PLAN REVIEW A SPOT CHECK WILL BE DONE, AND A PROVISO |
| ADDED (ALL DOORS AND GATES IN THE MEANS OF EGRESS FOR |
| ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY, ELECTRICAL ROOMS, STAIRS, AND OTHER |
| LOCATIONS REQUIRED ARE TO HAVE PANIC BARS OR FIRE EXIT |
| HARDWARE IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBC B 1008.1.10). |
| |
| 26. BUILT IN BENCHES TO COMPLY WITH FBC A 903. |
| 27. DRESSING, FITTING AND LOCKER ROOMS TO COMPLY WITH |
| FBC A 222, REVISE PLAN TO SHOW COMPLIANCE. |
| 28. SPA RECEPTION/ RETAIL DESK, ANY OTHER CHECK OUT |
| AREAS, SEE FBC A 904 NOTE ON PLAN AND PROVIDE A DETAIL |
| 2ND REVIEW: RESPONSE TO 26, 27, 28 REFERS TO D SHEETS; |
| THESE PAGES ARE NOT SIGNED AND SEALED AND IT IS NOT |
| CLEAR WHO IS TAKING RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE PAGES. |
| PLEASE REMOVE THE SHEETS AS IT APPEARS MOST OF THE |
| INFORMATION IS NOT REQUIRED. ITEMS 26, 27, AND 28 CAN |
| BE A PROVISO ITEM. |
| |
| 29. OK |
| |
| 30. ARCHITECT'S TITLE BLOCK LACKS THE ARCHITECT |
| BUSINESS NUMBER, REVISE TO INCLUDE, FS481, FAC 61G16. |
| |
| 2ND REVIEW, AR7073 IS THE ARCHITECT'S LICENSE NUMBER AS |
| AN INDIVIDUAL. THE FIRM, ADACHE GROUP ARCHITECTS, IS |
| REQUIRED TO HAVE A ARCHITECT BUSINESS NUMBER. PER DBPR |
| WEBSITE, THIS IS AA26002281. PLEASE ADD THIS NUMBER TO |
| ALL SHEETS, BUT ONLY UPLOAD PAGES WHICH CHANGE DUE TO |
| COMMENTS TO AVOID A LENGTHY 3RD REVIEW CYCLE. |
| |
| 31. SEE SIGNATURE REVIEW. |
| |
| 32. 2ND REVIEW; THE CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION IS |
| LACKING (FMEP), FS471, FAC61G15-23. PLEASE ADD TO ALL |
| SHEETS, BUT ONLY UPLOAD PAGES WHICH CHANGE DUE TO |
| COMMENTS. |
| |
| 33. OK |
| |
| 34. SEE SIGNATURE REVIEW. |
| |
| 35. SEE IMPACT FEE REVIEW. |
| |
| NEW COMMENTS |
| |
| 37. 05.31.2017 BCR FOOD SERVICE SPECIFICATIONS AND |
| 11.25.2016 BCR FOOD SERVICE PROPOSED LAYOUT WERE |
| UPLOADED INTO THE "DRAWINGS" FOLDER RATHER THAN |
| "SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS"; PLEASE MOVE (OR REMOVE) FROM |
| DRAWINGS FOLDER AND ENSURE THAT ALL REQUIRED |
| INFORMATION IS IN THE SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS FOLDER. |
| |
| 38. FBC B 603.1, A4.4.02 DETAIL 12 SHOWS POLYSTYRENE |
| OUTRIGGER AT METAL ROOFS AND POSSIBLY OTHER LOCATIONS, |
| OTHER DETAILS. PLEASE PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION VIA |
| EMAIL REGARDING HEIGHT OF LOCATIONS PROPOSED (OVER |
| 30'?), OVER EXITS. A4.4.03 SHOWS EXTERIOR FOAM; PROVIDE |
| INFORMATION VIA EMAIL. ARE THESE PRODUCTS |
| NONCOMBUSTIBLE? |
| |
| 39. ADVISORY ONLY, NEW SHEET A4.5.03 DETAIL 8 SHOWS A 1 |
| HOUR GLASS WALL AND REFERS TO WATER CURTAIN WALL. NOTE |
| THAT THE GLASS DETAIL SHOWS HORIZONTAL MULL BARS. |
| PLEASE NOTE THAT, IF THIS OPTION IS ELECTED VIA A |
| REVISION, EITHER THE HORIZONTAL MULL BARS ARE TO BE |
| REMOVED OR DOR IS REQUIRED TO REVIEW SPRINKLER HEAD |
| SPEC SHEETS TO CONFIRM THAT HORIZONTAL MULLIONS ARE |
| PERMITTED. IF THIS OPTION IS ELECTED VIA A REVISION, |
| PLANS ARE TO BE REVISED AND THE WINDOW SPRINKLER SPEC |
| SHEET IS TO BE SUBMITTED. |
| |
| 40. FBC 107, NEW SHEET 3-A4.5.04 SHOWS "CONTENTIOUS |
| WOOD BLOCKING", CLARIFY OR REVISE (DO YOU MEAN |
| CONTINUOUS?). |
| |
| 41. ADVISORY ONLY; SHEET D0.0.00 SHOWS A PLATFORM BED. |
| IT IS NOT CLEAR IF THIS BED COMPLIES WITH FBC A |
| 806.4(II), OPEN-FRAME TYPE BEDS REQUIRED. THIS WILL BE |
| A PROVISO ITEM. |
| |
| 42. THIS PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED WITH PROVISOS: |
| |
| A. COMPLIANCE WITH ART IN PUBLIC PLACES ORDINANCE |
| 78-123 REQUIRED: MS. SYBILLE WELTER, 561-822-1515, |
| [email protected]. MS. WELTER WILL ADVISE VIA EMAIL WHEN |
| THIS IS COMPLETE. |
| |
| B. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. SUB PERMITS FOR |
| MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING ARE REQUIRED. SEPARATE |
| PERMITS (APPLICATION, FEES, PLANS, REVIEWS) REQUIRED |
| FOR ALL OTHER ITEMS SUCH AS PARKING, SIGNAGE, ETC. |
| |
| C. COMPLIANCE WITH FBC B 1006, MEANS OF EGRESS |
| ILLUMINATION, INCLUDING EXIT DISCHARGE, REQUIRED. |
| |
| D. VOICE EVAC REQUIRED (NOTE 35, SHEET E3.1.02). |
| |
| E. ADVISORY ONLY; THE LANDSCAPE PLANS APPEAR TO |
| CONFLICT WITH THE EXIT DISCHARGE. LANDSCAPE PERMIT |
| REQUIRES A SEPARATE SUBMITTAL; PERMIT APPLICATION, |
| FEES, AND PLANS AND ARE NOT REVIEWED BY BUILDING. |
| |
| F. PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR ALL COMPONENTS AND CLADDING |
| ARE TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED BY DESIGNER OF RECORD, |
| REVIEWED AND ISSUED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. |
| |
| G. SHORING/RESHORE ENGINEERING ARE REQUIRED TO BE |
| SUBMITTED, REVIEWED, AND ISSUED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. |
| FAILURE TO DO SO WILL RESULT IN A STOP WORK ORDER. |
| |
| H. AN ENGINEERED CONSTRUCTION GUARD RAIL DETAIL IS |
| REQUIRED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. THIS MAY BE SUBMITTED |
| AS A SUBMITTAL ALONG WITH THE SHORING/RESHORE, BUT MAY |
| BE PROVIDED IN THE FIELD TO KEN CONRAD, SUBJECT TO HIS |
| APPROVAL. |
| |
| I. RECORDED REPLAT REQUIRED PRIOR TO C.O.; PROVIDE |
| BOOK/PAGE VIA EMAIL. |
| |
| |
| |
| |