Date |
Text |
2017-04-24 17:36:11 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| |
| SAMANTHA HILL |
| BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| [email protected] |
| 561-805-6724 |
| |
| FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 5TH EDITION (2014) |
| FBC B = FBC BUILDING |
| FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING |
| FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY |
| FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION |
| |
| W. P. B. PERMIT: 17020796 (BANYAN CAY HOTEL) |
| ADD: 3200 N. CONGRESS AVE. (ADDRESS TO BE ASSIGNED) |
| CONT: HEDRICK BROTHERS |
| TEL: 561-689-8880 |
| E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| |
| 1. REVISE SITE PLAN TO SHOW DISTANCE TO PROPERTY LINE |
| OR ASSUMED PROPERTY LINE BETWEEN BUIDINGS LOCATED ON |
| THE SAME LOT, DISTANCE OF PROPOSED HOTEL TO PROPERTY |
| LINE AND/OR ASSUMED PROPERTY LINE, DISTANCE OF ADJACENT |
| STRUCTURES TO ASSUMED PROPERTY LINE (IF APPLICABLE), |
| FBC B TABLE 602, 705.3. |
| |
| 2. A1.2.01 EXIT DISCHARGE NOT CLEAR; REVISE PLAN TO |
| SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC B 1027. |
| |
| 3. ACCESSIBLE MEANS OF EGRESS SELECTED NOT CLEAR; SEE |
| FBC 1007, FBC A 207.1. REVISE PLAN TO STATE WHICH |
| METHOD IS SELECTED AND CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WITH METHOD |
| SELECTED; REVISE PLAN IF NECESSARY TO SHOW COMPLIANCE. |
| |
| 4. A1.2.01 1ST FLOOR SQUARE FOOT AREA IS 31,750, |
| PROJECT DATA SHOWS 41,956. OTHER FLOORS ALSO |
| INCONSISTENT. REVISE TO CLARIFY DISCREPANCY, FBC 107. |
| |
| 5. SOME AREAS WERE NOT INCLUDED ON THE OCCUPANT LOAD |
| CHART; FOR INSTANCE, HOUSEKEEPING. ALTHOUGH OCCUPANT |
| LOADS FOR THESE AREA WILL BE LOW, THEY SHOULD BE |
| INCLUDED FOR AN ACCURATE TOTAL. THIS INFORMATION IS |
| REQUIRED FOR CO. |
| |
| 6. A1.2.01, CLARIFY FIRE RATED WALL AT RETAIL/COFFEE. |
| THIS, AND SOME OTHER FIRE RATED WALLS ARE NOT CLEAR AS |
| TO PURPOSE OR CONTINUITY, FBC 107. IF YOU WISH, PLEASE |
| CONTACT ME TO DISCUSS PRIOR TO RESUBMITTAL. FOR |
| INSTANCE, 2 HOUR BETWEEN MENS ROOM 1149 AND SALE & |
| ADMIN 1142, 1 HR BETWEEN BOARD RM #1 AND MEETING ROOM |
| #2. |
| |
| ALL FIRE RATED WALLS, PARTITIONS, BARRIERS SHOWN ON THE |
| PLAN WILL BE ENFORCED AS SUCH AT TIME OF INSPECTION. |
| |
| 7. A1.4.01B, FITNESS ROOM TO COMPLY WITH FBC A 1004, |
| REVISE TO SHOW COMPLIANCE. |
| |
| IF DETAILS SUCH AS SPECIFIC TYPES OF MACHINES PROPOSED |
| IS NOT AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME, REVISE THE PLAN TO SHOW |
| GENERAL COMPLIANCE. INCLUDE NOTES REGARDING COMPLIANCE. |
| THIS PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED WITH PROVISO, ISSUED AT |
| CONTRACTOR'S RISK, PROVIDE A DETAILED PLAN AT |
| INSPECTION. SUBJECT TO FIELD INSPECTOR'S DISCRETION, |
| FITNESS CENTER PLAN MAY BE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED FOR |
| PLAN REVIEW. |
| |
| 8. A1.4.02A WALL BETWEEN CORRIDOR AND AREA "OPEN TO |
| BELOW" LACKS A WALL TAG, FBC 107. |
| |
| 9. S2.04B, A4.2.01, OTHER PAGES, PLAN SPECS LUMBER IN |
| SEVERAL LOCATIONS (T&G SHEATHING, PLYWOOD, PRESSURE |
| TREATED PLYWOOD, WOOD TRUSS). FBC 603.1, REVISE PLAN TO |
| SPEC FRT OR REVISE PLAN INCLUDE EXCEPTION. |
| |
| 10. S2.04BT SPECS LIGHT GAUGE METAL TRUSSES, S2.04 |
| NOTES SPECS WOOD TRUSSES FOR MANSARD. REVISE PLAN TO |
| CLARIFY; CHECK ALL FOR CONSISTENCY, FBC 107. SEE ALSO |
| A4.2.01. |
| |
| 11. THRESHOLD BLDG., REQUIRED STATEMENT: |
| FS553.79(7)(D), W.P.B. AMENDMENT 110.3.7.4.4 ALL PLANS |
| FOR THE BUILDING WHICH ARE REQUIRED TO BE SIGNED AND |
| SEALED BY THE ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER OF RECORD CONTAIN A |
| STATEMENT THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE ARCHITECT'S OR |
| ENGINEER'S KNOWLEDGE, THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS |
| COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE MINIMUM BUILDING CODES AND |
| THE APPLICABLE FIRESAFETY STANDARDS AS DETERMINED BY |
| THE LOCAL AUTHORITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS CHAPTER AND |
| CHAPTER 633. |
| |
| SEE ALSO THRESHOLD REVIEW FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS |
| (SI AGREEMENT, RESUMES, ETC.). |
| |
| 12. SOIL BEARING VALUES. THE TEST BY UNIVERSAL |
| ENGINEERING SCIENCES REFERENCES THE TEST IS PRELIMINARY |
| GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT BANYAN CAY- HOTEL |
| PLEASE NOTE THE BORING SAMPLES TAKEN CH-1 AND CH-2 ARE |
| SHOWN FOR THE CLUBHOUSE, THIS SOILS REPORT HAS NO |
| BORINGS SHOWN IN THE REPORT FOR THE HOTEL. NOTE FOR THE |
| TENNIS CLUB CENTER UP TO 6 FEET OF MUCK WAS ENCOUNTERED |
| WITHIN THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT. PLEASE COMPLY WITH: 2014 |
| FBC-B 1803.3 BASIS OF INVESTIGATION. |
| SOIL CLASSIFICATION SHALL BE BASED ON OBSERVATION AND |
| ANY NECESSARY TESTS OF THE MATERIALS DISCLOSED BY |
| BORINGS, TEST PITS OR OTHER SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION MADE |
| IN APPROPRIATE LOCATIONS. ADDITIONAL STUDIES SHALL BE |
| MADE AS NECESSARY TO EVALUATE SLOPE STABILITY, SOIL |
| STRENGTH, POSITION AND ADEQUACY OF LOAD-BEARING SOILS, |
| THE EFFECT OF MOISTURE VARIATION ON SOIL-BEARING |
| CAPACITY, COMPRESSIBILITY, LIQUEFACTION AND |
| EXPANSIVENESS. |
| |
| 13. SHEET 019-S-4.10, PRESSURES MAY BE LOW; PROVIDE |
| CALCULATIONS FBC B 1609. REVISE PLAN TO INCLUDE PITCH |
| AND MEAN ROOF HEIGHT. WILL DESIGN PRESSURES SPECIFIED |
| APPLY TO ALL ROOF AREAS, REGARDLESS OF PITCH? ROOF PLAN |
| APPEARS TO INCLUDE ROOF AREAS OVER THE 4TH LEVEL, BUT |
| OTHER ROOF AREAS ARE NOT INCLUDED - FOR EXAMPLE, THE |
| PORTE COCHERE. REVISE PLAN TO INCLUDE ALL ROOF AREAS. |
| |
| 14. SOME SECTION DETAIL MARKERS APPEAR TO BE LABELED |
| INCORRECTLY AND DETAILS DO NOT CORRELATE WITH FLOOR |
| PLANS; FOR INSTANCE, SEE SHEET S2.00A. DETAIL MARKERS |
| REFERENCE PAGES S3.40, S3.41, UNABLE TO LOCATE; S4.08 |
| AND OTHER PAGES ALSO HAVE THIS ERROR. SEE SHEETS S3.42 |
| AND OTHER PAGES, UNABLE TO LOCATE THE SHEARWALL |
| LOCATIONS ON THE PLAN, REVISE OR DIRECT. |
| |
| 15. A1.8.01 AND OTHER PAGES PROVIDE A LEGEND FOR THE |
| FLOOR PLAN NOTE (THE BOX IN THE MIDDLE OF EACH FLOOR |
| PLAN). IT IS NOT CLEAR WHAT "P-1" MENAS. SOME AREAS |
| HAVE A "?"; CLARIFY. |
| |
| 16. SEE FBC A 209.2.1, 209.4, LABEL ALL PASSENGER |
| LOADING ZONES ON THE PLAN, REVISE PLAN TO SHOW |
| COMPLIANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS. |
| |
| 17. FBC A 806, REVISE PLAN TO SHOW COMPLIANCE. SOME ADA |
| ROOMS HAVE ACCESSIBILITY CLEAR FLOOR SPACE (4-1.5.02), |
| OTHERS DO NOT (3-1.5.02). |
| |
| 18. FBC 107, NO DETAILS FOR TUB, SHOWER, LAV, TOILETS, |
| URINALS PROVIDED. SEE PLUMBING REVIEW; ALL ARE |
| APPLICABLE FOR BUILDING REVIEW. |
| |
| 19. FBC A 806, PROVIDE A DETAIL TO SHOW COMPLIANCE, |
| ACCESSIBLE ROUTE TO GUEST ROOM BALCONY. THIS SHOULD |
| CORRELATE WITH THE SLIDING GLASS DOOR PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| THE DETAIL ON A5.2.01 DOES NOT INCLUDE DIMENSIONS TO |
| SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC A 303. ALSO PROVIDE THE |
| SLIDING GLASS DOOR PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| |
| 20. 4-A1.5.05, REVISE PLAN TO CLARIFY WHAT "ELEV #5" |
| AND "ELEV #3" ARE. |
| |
| 21. A1.2.02, THE RATED WALL REQUIRED BY FBC B 708.1 IS |
| NOT CONTINUOUS FOR SOME ROOMS (ROOMS NOT NUMBERED, SEE |
| LINES C8 THROUGH C10). |
| |
| 22. COMPLIANCE WITH FBC 1509.6.4 (ROOFTOP EQUIPMENT) |
| NOT CLEAR, REVISE PLAN TO CLARIFY. |
| |
| 23. ADVISE AS TO WHERE THE DOOR MARKERS FOR THE UNITS |
| CAN BE FOUND, FBC 107. LOCATION OF "BARN" DOORS IN THE |
| UNITS IS NOT CLEAR. |
| |
| 24. REVISE PLAN TO INCLUDE ASSEMBLIES FOR THE FIRE |
| RATED ELEMENTS REQUIRED BY FBC B TABLE 601. |
| |
| 25. SHEET A5.1.04 IS BLANK, FBC 107 PROVIDE INFORMATION |
| INCLUDING PANIC HARDWARE FBC B 1008.1.10. |
| |
| 26. BUILT IN BENCHES TO COMPLY WITH FBC A 903. |
| |
| 27. DRESSING, FITTING AND LOCKER ROOMS TO COMPLY WITH |
| FBC A 222, REVISE PLAN TO SHOW COMPLIANCE. |
| |
| 28. SPA RECEPTION/ RETAIL DESK, ANY OTHER CHECK OUT |
| AREAS, SEE FBC A 904 NOTE ON PLAN AND PROVIDE A DETAIL. |
| |
| 29. CIVIL SHEETS USE NGVD29 VERTICAL DATUM. A0.0.02 |
| PROPOSES A FINISHED FLOOR OF 22'0' NAVD88. THERE IS A |
| CONFLICT OF APPROXIMATELY 18"; REVISE TO BE CONSISTENT. |
| NGVD29 IS RECOMMENDED AT THIS TIME. |
| |
| 30. ARCHITECT'S TITLE BLOCK LACKS THE ARCHITECT |
| BUSINESS NUMBER, REVISE TO INCLUDE, FS481, FAC 61G16. |
| |
| 31. CIVIL, STRUCTURAL, AND ARCHITECTURAL (AND OTHER) |
| SHEETS ARE NOT DIGITALLY SIGNED. A SHEETS APPEAR TO BE |
| DIGITALLY SIGNED BUT LACK THE CERTIFICATE. PRIOR TO |
| RESUBMITTAL, PLEASE DIGITALLY SIGN EACH SHEET. IF |
| UNSURE AS TO ACCEPTABLE (PER FS471/FS481) FORMAT, |
| PLEASE SEND TEST PAGES TO ME VIA EMAIL FOR PRELIMINARY |
| REVIEW. FAILURE TO PROVIDE INDIVIDUALLY SIGNED PAGES |
| WILL RESULT IN A SEPARATE SIGNATURE REVIEW AFTER ALL |
| REVIEWS HAVE PASSED. THIS REVIEW MAY TAKE UP TO A WEEK |
| TO COMPLETE. INDIVIDUALLY SIGNED PAGES IS STRONGLY |
| ENCOURAGED IN ORDER TO TIMELY PROCESS THIS PERMIT. |
| PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU WISH TO DISCUSS |
| OPTIONS. |
| |
| 32. IT IS NOT CLEAR WHICH OF THE ENGINEERING COMPANIES |
| IN THE COMPANY BLOCK IS TO SERVE AS THE TITLE BLOCK FOR |
| THE VARIOUS ENGINEERS (FMEP). ALSO, THE CERTIFICATE OF |
| AUTHORIZATION IS LACKING, FS471, FAC61G15-23. |
| |
| 33. OK |
| |
| 34. SEE SIGNATURE REVIEW. |
| |
| 35. SEE IMPACT FEE REVIEW. |
| |
| 36. THIS PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED WITH PROVISOS: |
| |
| A. COMPLIANCE WITH ART IN PUBLIC PLACES ORDINANCE |
| 78-123 REQUIRED: MS. SYBILLE WELTER, 561-822-1515, |
| [email protected]. MS. WELTER WILL ADVISE VIA EMAIL WHEN |
| THIS IS COMPLETE. |
| |
| B. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. SUB PERMITS FOR |
| MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING ARE REQUIRED. SEPARATE |
| PERMITS (APPLICATION, FEES, PLANS, REVIEWS) REQUIRED |
| FOR ALL OTHER ITEMS SUCH AS PARKING, SIGNAGE, ETC. |
| |