Date |
Text |
2017-02-08 16:55:32 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE |
| MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: |
| |
| |
| 1) SHEET A5 - DOOR 102 IS NOT INDICATED AS BEING RATED. |
| |
| PER NFPA 101, CHAPTER 7 MEANS OF EGRESS. |
| |
| 7.1.3.2 EXITS. |
| 7.1.3.2.1 WHERE THIS CODE REQUIRES AN EXIT TO BE |
| SEPARATED FROM OTHER PARTS OF THE BUILDING, THE |
| SEPARATING CONSTRUCTION SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF |
| SECTION 8.2 AND THE FOLLOWING: |
| (1)* THE SEPARATION SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 1-HOUR FIRE |
| RESISTANCE RATING WHERE THE EXIT CONNECTS THREE OR |
| FEWER STORIES. |
| |
| (8) OPENINGS IN THE SEPARATION SHALL BE PROTECTED BY |
| FIRE DOOR ASSEMBLIES EQUIPPED WITH DOOR CLOSERS |
| COMPLYING WITH 7.2.1.8. |
| |
| (9)* OPENINGS IN EXIT ENCLOSURES SHALL BE LIMITED TO |
| DOOR ASSEMBLIES FROM NORMALLY OCCUPIED SPACES AND |
| CORRIDORS AND DOOR ASSEMBLIES FOR EGRESS FROM THE |
| ENCLOSURE, |
| |
| |
| FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES AND INCLUDED IN THE NFPA 101 |
| LIFE SAFETY HANDBOOK THE EXTERIOR DOOR DOES REQUIRED TO |
| BE RATED; HOWEVER, IT MUST BE CONSIDERED IF THERE IS AN |
| EXSPOSURE FROM AN ADJACENT SOURCE. |
| |
| FOR AREAS ALONG CLEMATIS IT IS COMMON TO PLACE TABLES |
| AND CHAIRS AND OTHER COMBUSTIBLES ON THE FRONT EXTERIOR |
| AREAS. FOR FUTURE POTENTIAL PROJECT USE IT IS STRONGLY |
| RECOMMENDED THAT THIS RATED STAIRWELL DOOR BE RATED |
| CONSISTENT WITH THE ENTIRE STAIRWELL CONSTURCTION |
| PROPERTIES. |
| |
| |
| |
| 2) SHEET T $ LS 1 - THERE IS INDICATIONS OF THE |
| INSTALLATION OF A FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM WITH SHOP |
| DRAWINGS. PER FAC THE DESIGN SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH |
| THE REQUIREMENTS OF FAC 61G. |
| |
| PER FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE SECTION 61G15-32.004, |
| FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS SHALL INCLUDE THE |
| POINT OF SERVICE FOR THE WATER SUPPLY, A LIST OF |
| APPLICABLE NFPA STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO THE PROJECT, |
| CLASSIFICATION OF HAZARD OCCUPANCY FOR EACH ROOM OR |
| AREA, SUPPRESSION SYSTEM TYPE, DESIGN DENSITIES, WATER |
| SUPPLY DATA (FIRE PUMP DATA, HYDRANT FLOW TEST DATA) |
| AND ANY PERFORMANCE BASED INFORMATION SUCH AS |
| PRE-ENGINEERED SYSTEMS. |
| |
| 61G15-32.003 COMMON REQUIREMENTS TO ALL FIRE PROTECTION |
| ENGINEERING |
| DOCUMENTS. |
| (1) THE FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS |
| SHALL PROVIDE THE ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS TO BE USED |
| IN THE PREPARATION OF THE FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM LAYOUT |
| DOCUMENTS AND TO INDICATE THE NATURE AND SCOPE OF THE |
| WORK, AND TO DESCRIBE, DETAIL, DIMENSION, LABEL AND |
| DEFINE THE FIRE PROTECTION COMPONENTS, SYSTEM(S), |
| MATERIALS, ASSEMBLIES, EQUIPMENT AND ITS STRUCTURAL AND |
| UTILITY SUPPORT SYSTEM(S), INSOFAR AS THEY INVOLVE THE |
| SAFEGUARDING OF LIFE, HEALTH OR PROPERTY. |
| (2) THE FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS |
| SHALL SPECIFY THE APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE |
| ACCEPTANCE TESTING OF THE FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM AND |
| COMPONENTS, WHICH SHALL BE BASED UPON APPLICABLE CODES |
| AND STANDARDS, WHERE AVAILABLE. |
| (3) THE OCCUPANCY OF THE AREA OR DESCRIPTION OF A |
| SPECIFIC HAZARD BEING PROTECTED BY THE FIRE PROTECTION |
| SYSTEM(S) SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM |
| ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS. |
| (4) THE APPLICABLE CODE AND STANDARD TO BE USED IN THE |
| PREPARATION OF THE FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM LAYOUT |
| DOCUMENTS SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM |
| ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS. WHEN CODES AND STANDARDS ARE NOT |
| AVAILABLE OR APPLICABLE, AND SAID LAYOUT DOCUMENTS ARE |
| TO BE BASED ON ENGINEERING JUDGMENT, ANY REASONS AND |
| ASSUMPTIONS MADE TO DEVELOP THE FIRE PROTECTION CONCEPT |
| SHALL BE IDENTIFIED ON THE FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM |
| ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS. |
| (5) STRUCTURAL SUPPORT AND STRUCTURAL OPENINGS REQUIRED |
| BY THE FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE |
| FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS AND SHALL |
| BE REFERENCED ON STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS. |
| (6) WHEN LAYOUT DOCUMENTS CONTAIN MATERIAL DEVIATION |
| FROM THE ENGINEER OF RECORD'S FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM |
| ENGINEERING DOCUMENT, SUCH LAYOUT DOCUMENTS ARE NOT |
| COMPLIANT UNLESS THEY ARE ACCOMPANIED BY REVISED |
| ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS MADE AND SEALED BY THE ENGINEER |
| OF RECORD FOR THE FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM. |
| (7) REQUIREMENTS FOR ACTIVATION CONTROL SYSTEMS, |
| SEQUENCE, OPERATING PARAMETERS, INTERLOCKS, SAFETY |
| RELATED DEVICES, INDICATORS AND ALARMS, SHALL BE SHOWN |
| ON THE FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS, |
| UNLESS SHOWN ON OTHER RELATED DOCUMENTS. |
| (8) ANY INFORMATION DEEMED APPROPRIATE BY THE ENGINEER |
| OF RECORD TO ASSIST THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION |
| IN UNDERSTANDING THE OWNER?S INTENDED USE AND PROPOSED |
| PROTECTION OF THE BUILDING OR FACILITY AND TO PROVIDE |
| SUFFICIENT DIRECTION TO THE INSTALLATION CONTRACTOR OR |
| OTHER INTERESTED PARTIES REGARDING THE LAYOUT OF THE |
| SYSTEM(S), SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE FIRE PROTECTION |
| SYSTEM ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS. |
| SPECIFIC AUTHORITY 471.008, 471.033(2), FS |
| LAW IMPLEMENTED 471.005(7), 471.033(2), FS |
| HISTORY?NEW 5-19-93, FORMERLY 21H-32.003, AMENDED |
| 4-2-2000, 6-26-01 |
| |
| 61G15-32.004 DESIGN OF WATER BASED FIRE PROTECTION |
| SYSTEMS. |
| (1) WATER BASED FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS INCLUDE, BUT |
| ARE NOT LIMITED TO, AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEMS OF WET, |
| DRY, FINE WATER SPRAY (MIST), MANUAL, AND DELUGE VALVE |
| CONTROLLED TYPES, PUMPING SYSTEMS, STANDPIPES, FIRE |
| WATER MAINS AND DEDICATED FIRE PROTECTION WATER |
| SOURCES. |
| (2) TO ENSURE MINIMUM DESIGN QUALITY IN FIRE PROTECTION |
| SYSTEM ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS, SAID DOCUMENTS SHALL |
| INCLUDE AS A MINIMUM THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION WHEN |
| APPLICABLE: |
| (A) THE POINT OF SERVICE FOR THE FIRE PROTECTION WATER |
| SUPPLY AS DEFINED BY 633.021(18) F.S. |
| (B) APPLICABLE NFPA STANDARD TO BE APPLIED, OR IN THE |
| CASE WHERE NO SUCH STANDARD EXISTS, THE ENGINEERING |
| STUDY, JUDGMENTS, AND/OR PERFORMANCE BASED ANALYSIS AND |
| CONCLUSIONS. |
| (C) CLASSIFICATION OF HAZARD OCCUPANCY FOR EACH ROOM OR |
| AREA. |
| (D) DESIGN APPROACH, WHICH INCLUDES SYSTEM TYPE, |
| DENSITIES, DEVICE TEMPERATURE RATING, AND SPACING FOR |
| EACH SEPARATE 42 HAZARD OCCUPANCY. |
| (E) CHARACTERISTICS OF WATER SUPPLY TO BE USED, SUCH AS |
| MAIN SIZE AND LOCATION, WHETHER IT IS DEAD-END OR |
| CIRCULATING; AND IF DEAD-END, THE DISTANCE TO THE |
| NEAREST CIRCULATING MAIN, AS WELL AS ITS MINIMUM |
| DURATION AND RELIABILITY FOR THE MOST HYDRAULICALLY |
| DEMANDING DESIGN AREA. |
| (F) WHEN PRIVATE OR PUBLIC WATER SUPPLIES ARE USED, THE |
| FLOW TEST DATA, INCLUDING DATE AND TIME OF TEST, WHO |
| CONDUCTED TEST OR SUPPLIED INFORMATION, TEST ELEVATION, |
| STATIC GAUGE PRESSURE AT NO FLOW, FLOW RATE WITH |
| RESIDUAL GAUGE PRESSURE, HYDRANT BUTT COEFFICIENT, AND |
| LOCATION OF TEST IN RELATION TO THE HYDRAULIC POINT OF |
| SERVICE. |
| (G) VALVING AND ALARM REQUIREMENTS TO MINIMIZE |
| POTENTIAL FOR IMPAIRMENTS AND UNRECOGNIZED FLOW OF |
| WATER. |
| (H) MICROBIAL INDUCED CORROSION (MIC). THE ENGINEER OF |
| RECORD SHALL MAKE REASONABLE EFFORTS TO IDENTIFY WATER |
| SUPPLIES THAT COULD LEAD TO MICROBIAL INDUCED CORROSION |
| (MIC). SUCH EFFORTS MAY CONSIST OF DISCUSSIONS WITH THE |
| LOCAL WATER PURVEYOR AND/OR FIRE OFFICIAL, FAMILIARITY |
| WITH CONDITIONS IN THE LOCAL AREA, OR LABORATORY |
| TESTING OF WATER SUPPLIES. WHEN CONDITIONS ARE FOUND |
| THAT MAY RESULT IN MIC CONTAMINATION OF THE FIRE |
| PROTECTION PIPING, THE ENGINEER SHALL DESIGN CORRECTIVE |
| MEASURES. |
| (I) BACKFLOW PREVENTION AND METERING SPECIFICATIONS AND |
| DETAILS TO MEET LOCAL WATER PURVEYOR REQUIREMENTS |
| INCLUDING MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE PRESSURE DROP. |
| (J) QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATIONS OF ALL YARD |
| AND INTERIOR FIRE PROTECTION COMPONENTS. |
| (3) CONTRACTOR SUBMITTALS WHICH DEVIATE FROM THE ABOVE |
| MINIMUM DESIGN PARAMETERS SHALL BE CONSIDERED MATERIAL |
| DEVIATIONS AND REQUIRE SUPPLEMENTAL ENGINEERING |
| APPROVAL AND DOCUMENTATION. |
| (4) IN THE EVENT THE ENGINEER OF RECORD PROVIDES MORE |
| INFORMATION AND DIRECTION THAN IS ESTABLISHED ABOVE, HE |
| OR SHE SHALL BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR THE TECHNICAL |
| ACCURACY OF THE WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE |
| CODES, STANDARDS, AND SOUND ENGINEERING PRINCIPLES. |
| SPECIFIC AUTHORITY 471.008, 471.033(2), FS |
| LAW IMPLEMENTED 471.005(7), 471.033(2), FS |
| HISTORY?NEW 5-19-93, FORMERLY 21H-32.004, AMENDED |
| 4-2-2000, 6-26-01, 7-12-05 |
| |
| |
| THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH THIS PERMIT IN |
| PLAN DRAWINGS OR IN NARRATIVE FORM SIGNED AND SEALED BY |
| THE APPLICABLE QUALIFIED ENGINEER. THE SHOP DRAWINGS |
| SHALL THEN BE DESIGNED AND SUBMITTED UNDER THOSE |
| CRITERIA AND SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL. |
| |
| PLEASE PROVIDE PER THE REQUIREMENT. |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| 3) SHEET A1 - THE DIMENSIONS FOR THE REAR STAIR ARE NOT |
| INDICATED, INCLUDING HAND RAILS, LANDINGS, TREADS, AND |
| RISERS. |
| |
| PLEASE PROVIDE THEM AND ENSURE THE MEET THE REQUIRMENTS |
| OF THE CODE. |
| |
| |
| |
| 4) SHEET E1 - ON THE FIRST FLOOR, THERE IS AN EXIT SIGN |
| INDICATED AT THE 1ST REAR EXIT DOOR THAT IS INBETWEEN |
| TWO DOORS. PLEASE RELOCATE THIS EXIT DOOR TO THE CENTER |
| OF THE EXIT DOOR TO AVOID CONFUSION WITH THE ADJACENT |
| DOOR. IF THIS CAN'T BE ACCOMPLISHED, A SIGN WOULD BE |
| REQUIRED ON THE ADJACENT DOOR INDICATING "THIS IS NOT |
| AN EXIT". |
| |
| PLEASE REVIEW AND PROVIDE REMEDY. |
| |
| |
| |
| 5) WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE PLAN SHEET |
| REVISION CLOUDS OR NUMBERED NARRATIVE RESPONSES TO THE |
| ABOVE. |
| |
| |
| |
| 6) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED ON THE |
| RE-SUBMITTAL OF THE ABOVE. |
| |
| |
| |
| PETER LEDUC |
| FIRE MARSHAL |
| 561-804-4709 |
| [email protected] |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |