Date |
Text |
2017-05-18 18:41:32 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) ADDITIONS/ALTERATIONS SECOND BUILDING |
| REVIEW CHECKLIST. |
| CODE: FBC 5TH EDITION (2014) |
| |
| NOTE: |
| OLD PLANS WERE NOT RESUBMITTED AS REQUESTED ON PREVIOUS |
| CHECKLIST. THIS DELAYS THE REVIEW PROCESS AND PROVIDES |
| NO REFERENCE OF WHAT WAS REVIEWED THE FIRST TIME. |
| |
| |
| ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| 1- THERE ARE TWO SEPARATE STRUCTURES IN THIS SUBMITTAL. |
| PROVIDE A PERMIT APPLICATION FOR EACH BUILDING. MAIN |
| HOUSE AND GUEST HOUSE. SEC. 105.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL. NEED A |
| PERMIT APPLICATION FOR EACH STRUCTURE. |
| |
| 2- GUEST HOUSE ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| NEED TO SPECIFY 1 HOUR FIRE RATED ASSEMBLY FOR THE WEST |
| WALL WITH FIRE EXPOSURE FROM BOTH SIDES AS REQUIRED BY |
| TABLE R302.1(1). ASSEMBLY NEED TO TESTED IN ACCORDANCE |
| WITH ASTM E 119 OR UL 263. |
| RESPONSE: NEED 1 HOUR FIRE RATED WALL ASSEMBLY THAT |
| PROVIDES FIRE PROTECTION FROM BOTH SIDES. THAT'S WHY I |
| WROTE BOTH SIDES IN CAPITAL LETTERS TO MAKE SURE PROPER |
| ASSEMBLY WAS SPECIFIED. THE SPECIFIED ASSEMBLY DESIGN |
| NO. U356 IS FOR FIRE EXPOSURE ON THE INTERIOR FACE |
| ONLY. REVISE AS REQUIRED. SPECIFY ASSEMBLY THAT |
| PROVIDES PROTECTION ON BOTH SIDES. NOTE: THE 1 HOUR |
| PROTECTION FROM BOTH SIDES APPLIES TO FIRST AND SECOND |
| FLOOR NOT JUST THE SECOND FLOOR ADDITION. REVISE PLANS |
| SHOWING COMPLIANCE FOR FIRST AND SECOND FLOOR. |
| |
| 3- GUEST HOUSE ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| GUEST BEDROOM WINDOW ABOVE GARAGE DOESN'T COMPLY WITH |
| THE EGRESS REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. R310 FBC-RESIDENTIAL |
| 5TH EDITION (2014). NEED TO COMPLY WITH THE MIN. CLEAR |
| HEIGHT AND TOTAL CLEAR OPENING. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| RESPONSE: NONE OF THE WINDOWS ON THE SECOND FLOOR |
| BEDROOM COMPLIES WITH THE EGRESS REQUIREMENTS. SINGLE |
| HUNG PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED IS FOR CGI WINDOWS. |
| LOOK ON THE INTERNET FOR THE WINDOW SIZE CHART FOR |
| SIZES THAT COMPLY FOR EGRESS (SECOND FLOOR) AND REVISE |
| SIZE AS REQUIRED. |
| |
| 4- ORIGINAL COMMENT: BUILDING SECTION AT MAIN HOUSE |
| 2/A2.1 SHOWS A STAIRWAY WITH OPEN RISERS. OPEN RISERS |
| ARE NOT ALLOWED UNLESS THEY COMPLY WITH SEC. R311.7.5.1 |
| FBC-RESIDENTIAL. PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND |
| SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING COMPLIANCE. |
| RESPONSE: SECTION 2/A2.1 AND SECTION NEEDS TO BE |
| REVISED/CLARIFIED. (1)THE HEADROOM CLEARANCE OF 6'-8" |
| AS SHOWN WITH DASHED LINES DOESN'T WORK. (2)SPACING |
| BETWEEN PICKETS CAN NOT BE 4" MIN. IT HAS TO BE LESS |
| THAN 4" SO AN SPHERE CAN NOT PASS THRU. (3)MATERIALS |
| AND DIMENSIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF STAIRS IS NOT |
| SPECIFIED. UNABLE TO VERIFY THE SPACE BETWEEN OPEN |
| RISERS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE OPEN RISERS EXCEPTION. |
| REVISE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS AS REQUIRED. NOTE: |
| STAIRS/HANDRAILS SHOP DRAWINGS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR |
| REVIEW PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. |
| ARCHITECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVE PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL. |
| |
| 5- ORIGINAL COMMENT: PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND |
| SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF ALL STAIRS, |
| HANDRAILS AND GUARDRAILS (INCLUDING BALCONY GUARDRAILS) |
| SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH THE LIVE LOADS OF TABLE R301.5 |
| AND ALL THE REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. R311.7.5, SEC. |
| R311.7.8 AND SEC. R312.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| RESPONSE: ARCHITECT TO SPECIFY THE LIVE LOADS DESIGN |
| CRITERIA REQUIRED BY TABLE R301.5 SO SHOP DRAWINGS ARE |
| PRODUCED BASED ON THAT DESIGN CRITERIA. DRAWINGS |
| SUBMITTED DON'T PROVIDE THIS INFORMATION. |
| |
| 6- ORIGINAL COMMENT: PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND |
| SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE NEW SCREEN |
| ENCLOSURE IN THE OPEN LOGGIA. SPECIFY ALL FRAMING |
| MEMBERS AND FASTENERS AND PROVIDE MESH SPECIFICATIONS. |
| SEC. R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| RESPONSE: ARCHITECT STATED ON PLANS TO PROVIDE SIGNED |
| AND SEALED SHOP DRAWINGS FOR THE SCREEN ENCLOSURE. |
| THERE IS NO SHOP DRAWINGS SUBMITTAL FOR SCREEN |
| ENCLOSURES. ARCHITECT NEEDS TO PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS |
| AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE SCREEN |
| ENCLOSURE OR NEED TO PROVIDE COMPLETE ENGINEERED |
| DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT. |
| |
| 7- FLAT ROOF FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL FL2533-R16 |
| SUBMITTED; |
| A) ORIGINAL COMMENT: CLEARLY SPECIFY WHICH APPROVED |
| ASSEMBLY IS GOING TO BE INSTALLED TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE |
| WITH THE DESIGN PRESSURES OF SEC. R301.1 |
| FC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL. |
| |
| B) ORIGINAL COMMENT: IF SELECTED ASSEMBLY DOESN'T MEET |
| THE DESIGN PRESSURES FOR ALL ROOF ZONES, THEN SIGNED |
| AND SEALED RAS 117 CALCULATIONS ARE REQUIRED TO MEET |
| THE DESIGN PRESSURES OF SEC. R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| SEE NOTE #8 ON PAGE 2 OF 58 OF FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| SUBMITTED. |
| RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL. |
| |
| 8- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY |
| FAC 61G20-3.002(33) FOR: |
| A) ORIGINAL COMMENT: BALCONY DECK UNDERLAYMENT. NOTE: |
| NEED PRODUCT APPROVAL THAT IS DESIGNED TO BE USED WITH |
| THE SPECIFIC DECK FINISH MATERIAL TO BE INSTALLED IN |
| THIS HOUSE. IN ADDITION CLEARLY IDENTIFY SPECIFIC |
| ASSEMBLY TO BE INSTALLED AND PROVIDE SIGNED AND SEALED |
| RAS 117 CALCULATIONS IF SELECTED ASSEMBLY DOESN'T MEET |
| THE DESIGN PRESSURES FOR ALL ROOF DECK ZONES. |
| RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL. |
| |
| B) ORIGINAL COMMENT: ROOF CLAY TILE. NOA 12-0210.01 |
| SUBMITTED EXPIRED ON 02/01/16. NEED TO PROVIDE CURRENT |
| PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL. |
| |
| C) ORIGINAL COMMENT: ROOF TILE ADHESIVE IF SPECIFIED BY |
| THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD. SEE ROOF TILE PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| FOR LISTED ADHESIVES. |
| RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL. |
| |
| D) ORIGINAL COMMENT: OVERHEAD GARAGE DOOR THAT MEETS |
| THE DESIGN PRESSURES CALCULATED BY THE ARCHITECT OF |
| RECORD ON SHEET A3.2. |
| NOA 16-0617.07 SUBMITTED DOESN'T MEET THOSE DESIGN |
| PRESSURES. |
| RESPONSE: IT LOOKS LIKE THE DESIGN PRESSURES SHOWN ON |
| SHEET A3.2 WERE REVISED. THE REVISED DESIGN PRESSURES |
| DON'T SEEM TO COMPLY WITH THE DESIGN PRESSURES FOR A |
| TWO STORY STRUCTURE LOCATED IN EXPOSURE "D". REVISE |
| DESIGN PRESSURES AS REQUIRED OR PROVIDE COMPLETE |
| CALCULATIONS SHOWING HOW THE SPECIFIED DESIGN PRESSURES |
| WERE OBTAINED. |
| |
| E) ORIGINAL COMMENT: SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS. NEED LARGE |
| MISSILE IMPACT RESISTANT PRODUCT APPROVAL. NOA |
| 15-0512.08 SUBMITTED IS FOR SMALL MISSILE IMPACT |
| RESISTANT. |
| RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL. |
| |
| F) ORIGINAL COMMENT: WINDOW MULLIONS AS SHOWN ON PLANS. |
| AND, SPECIFY MULLION SIZE TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE |
| DESIGN PRESSURES OF SEC. R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL. |
| |
| G) ORIGINAL COMMENT: FIXED WINDOWS AS SPECIFIED ON |
| PLANS. |
| RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL. |
| |
| H) ORIGINAL COMMENT: GUEST HOUSE EXTERIOR SWING DOOR AS |
| SHOWN ON PLANS. |
| |
| 9- ARCHITECT OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE ABOVE |
| PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY |
| AMENDMENTS. |
| |
| 10- ORIGINAL COMMENT: PROVIDE DETAILS AND |
| SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE GARAGE AND DWELLING SEPARATION |
| AS REQUIRED BY TABLE R302.6 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| RESPONSE: SHEET A1.3 DOESN'T PROVIDE INFORMATION FOR |
| THE GARAGE AND DWELLING SEPARATION. THE UL FIRE |
| SEPARATION MENTIONED BY THE ARCHITECT ON THE RESPONSE |
| LETTER IS FOR THE REQUIRED FIRE RATED EXTERIOR WALL NOT |
| FOR THE SEPARATION REQUIRED AT THE GARAGE CEILING. |
| PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION. |
| |
| PLEASE READ THE FOLLOWING: |
| *****PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH |
| COMMENT TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. |
| **** PLEASE INSERT ANY REVISED DRAWING AND REMOVE OLD |
| DRAWING. DON'T STAPLE OLD DRAWINGS. SUBMIT OLD |
| DRAWIINGS FOR REFERENCE. |
| |
| IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT |
| JULIO GOMEZ |
| COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| BUILDING DIVISION |
| (561)805-6712 |
| [email protected] |