Date |
Text |
2017-03-15 09:22:54 | NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (R3), SECOND BUILDING |
| REVIEW CHECKLIST. |
| CODE: FBC 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| |
| NOTE: ENGINEER OF RECORD MAY BE CHARGED FOUR TIMES THE |
| PLAN REVIEW FEE AS REQUIRED BY FLORIDA STATUTE |
| 553.80(2)(B) WHEN THE PLANS ARE REJECTED THREE OR MORE |
| TIMES. |
| |
| 1- NOW THAT FLOOR PLANS ARE COMPLETE SHOWING A COMPLETE |
| LAYOUT OF THE FLOOR PLANS, INCLUDING ALL PLUMBING |
| FIXTURES, IT IS CLEAR THAT THE FIRST FLOOR STUDY ROOM |
| DOESN'T COMPLY WITH THE EGRESS REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. |
| R311.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. NEED TO HAVE A CONTINUOUS AND |
| UNOBSTRUCTED PATH OF HORIZONTAL EGRESS TRAVEL FROM THE |
| STUDY ROOM. PASSING THRU THE BATHROOM IN ORDER TO EXIT |
| THE STUDY ROOM IS NOT ALLOWED. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| ALSO, THIS IS NOT A HALF BATHROOM. THIS IS A FULL |
| BATHROOM. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| |
| 2- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY |
| FAC 61G20-3.002(33) FOR: |
| A) ARCHED SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS AS SHOWN ON |
| PLANS/ELEVATIONS. |
| RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. |
| |
| B) CASEMENT WINDOWS AS SHOWN ON PLANS. |
| RESPONSE: NEED TO PROVIDEE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| COVER PAGE THAT INCLUDES DRAWINGS SUBMITTED. IF THERE |
| IS NO FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL, THEN MANUFACTURER MAY |
| SUBMIT COMPLETE SIGNED AND SEALED (ORIGINALS) DRAWINGS |
| FOR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL. NOTE: DRAWINGS SUBMITTED |
| ARE FOR VINYL WINDOWS. HISTORIC DOESN'T ALLOW VINYL |
| WINDOWS. DRAWINGS SUBMITTED ARE FOR NON-IMPACT VINYL |
| CASEMENT WINDOWS. NEED HURRICANE SHUTTERS PRODUCT |
| APPROVAL. |
| |
| C) HURRICANE SHUTTERS. COORDINATE WITH ITEM #2(B) |
| ABOVE. AND PROVIDE COMPLETE INSTALLATION SCHEDULE. SEE |
| CITY SAMPLE. |
| |
| D) ROOF TILE AS SHOWN ON PLANS |
| RESPONSE: CLARIFY ROOF TILE ATTACHMENT. USING |
| NAILS/SCREWS OR ADHESIVE. CLARIFY WHY FLORIDA PRODUCT |
| APPROVAL FL7804-R9 SUBMITTED IS HIGHLIGHTED ON PAGE 7 |
| OF 9 WITH A MECHANICALLY FASTENED ATTACHMENT METHOD AND |
| WHY SUBMITTING A PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR ROOF TILE |
| ADHESIVE. IF USING , NAILS/SCREWS, THEN ENGINEER OF |
| RECORD TO SPECIFY SIZE AND NUMBER OF SCREWS. SEC. |
| 107.2.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS AND R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| |
| E) ROOF TILE SELF-ADHERED UNDERLAYMENT AS SPECIFIED ON |
| PLANS. |
| RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. |
| |
| F) FLAT ROOF AS SHOWN ON PLANS FOR GARAGE AND ROOF DECK |
| ABOVE FRONT PORCH. AND CLEARLY IDENTIFY WHICH APPROVED |
| ASSEMBLY IS GOING TO BE USED. AND, PROVIDE SIGNED AND |
| SEALED RAS 117 CALCULATIONS IF SELECTED ASSEMBLY |
| DOESN'T MEET THE CALCULATED DESIGN PRESSURES. NOTE: |
| VERIFY THAT SELECTED ASSEMBLY ALLOWS FOR RAS 117 |
| CALCULATIONS. |
| RESPONSE: THERE ARE TWO DIFFERENT PRODUCT APPROVALS |
| SUBMITTED: FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL FL16733-R3 AND NOA |
| 13-0409.09. CLARIFY WHICH ONE IS GOING TO BE USED IN |
| THIS PROJECT. OR IF USING BOTH, THEN CLEARLY SPECIFY |
| WHERE EACH PRODUCT APPROVAL IS GOING TO BE INSTALLED: |
| GARAGE OR MAIN HOUSE ROOF DECK ABOVE FRONT PORCH. |
| NOTES: (1) SELECTED ASSEMBLY W-8 FROM FLORIDA PRODUCT |
| APPROVAL FL16733-R3 REQUIRES SIGNED AND SEALED RAS 117 |
| CALCULATIONS FOR NAIL ENHANCEMENT AT PERIMETER AND |
| CORNER AREAS. PROVIDE SUCH CALCULATIONS. (2) NONE OF |
| THE ASSEMBLIES SUBMITTED WITH NOA 13-0409.09 CAN BE |
| USED BECAUSE THEY ARE LIMITED BY GENERAL LIMITATION #9. |
| GENERAL LIMITATION #9 DOESN'T ALLOW RAS 117 |
| CALCULATIONS. NEED TO SELECT ASSEMBLY THAT IS LIMITED |
| BY GENERAL LIMITATION #7 AND NEED TO PROVIDE SIGNED AND |
| SEALED RAS 117 CALCULATIONS TO MEET THE DESIGN |
| PRESSURES OF SEC. R301.1 FB-RESIDENTIAL. |
| |
| G) ALL SIMPSON STRUCTURAL CONNECTORS SPECIFIED ON PLANS |
| AND DETAILS. PROVIDE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER |
| PAGE AND PAGE SHOWING THE SPECIFIED CONNECTOR OR |
| ENGINEER OF RECORD TO LIST THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| NUMBER NEXT TO EACH SPECIFIED CONNECTOR. |
| RESPONSE: EVALUATION REPORT ESR-2549 AND ESR-2552 |
| SUBMITTED EXPIRED ON JANUARY 2016 AND MARCH 2016 |
| RESPECTIVELY. NEED PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR ALL CONNECTORS |
| SPECIFIED ON PLANS AND NEED CURRENT FLORIDA PRODUCT |
| APPROVAL AND NEED CURRENT ESR REPORTS. |
| |
| H) WINDOW MULLION AS SHOWN ON PLANS. AND, CLEARLY |
| SPECIFY SIZE TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE CALCULATED |
| DESIGN PRESSURES. |
| RESPONSE: NEED TO SPECIFY SIZE OF MULLION ON FLORIDA |
| PRODUCT APPROVAL FL11870-R4 SUBMITTED. AND, CLARIFY WHY |
| SUBMITTING TWO COPIES OF DRAWINGS. |
| |
| I) RECTANGULAR AND ARCHED FIXED WINDOWS AS SHOWN ON |
| PLANS. NOTE: NEED FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER PAGE |
| THAT INCLUDES DRAWINGS SUBMITTED FOR THE RECTANGULAR |
| WINDOWS. AND NEED PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR THE ARCHED |
| WINDOWS. |
| |
| 3- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS |
| REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| RESPONSE: NOT ALL THE PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE REVIEWED |
| BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. SOME PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE |
| LEFT OUT WITHOUT THE ENGINEER'S APPROVAL. ENGINEER OF |
| RECORD TO APPROVE IN WRITING EACH PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| SUBMITTED. |
| |
| 4- PROVIDE SOIL TEST REPORT (2 COPIES). SEC. R401.4 |
| FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. |
| |
| 5- PROVIDE DRAINAGE PLAN (2 COPIES) SHOWING COMPLIANCE |
| WITH SEC. R401.3 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. NOTE: WATER NEEDS TO |
| BE DIVERTED AWAY FROM THE FOUNDATION AND TO AN APPROVED |
| POINT OF COLLECTION |
| RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. |
| |
| 6- SECOND FLOOR WINDOWS NEED TO COMPLY WITH THE WINDOW |
| FALL PROTECTION AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R312.2 |
| FBC-RESIDENTIAL. PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND |
| SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING COMPLIANCE FOR THE WINDOWS ON |
| THE SECOND FLOOR THAT NEED TO COMPLY WITH THIS SECTION. |
| RESPONSE: EXTERIOR WINDOWS & DOORS NOTES ON SHEET A2.00 |
| AND A3.00 ONLY MENTION TO HAVE A WINDOW SILL NOT LESS |
| THAN 24" ABOVE FINISH FLOOR. BUT PLANS AND EXTERIOR |
| ELEVATIONS DON'T SHOW HOW THIS IS ACHIEVED. WINDOW |
| HEIGHT AND SIZES WERE NOT REVISED TO REFLECT THE WINDOW |
| SILL LOCATION. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO COMPLY. NOTE: KEEP |
| IN MIND EGRESS REQUIREMENTS. |
| |
| 7- PROVIDE INFORMATION FOR THE ROOF VENTILATION AT THE |
| SEPARATE GARAGE STRUCTURE SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. |
| R806.2 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. |
| |
| 8- NEW COMMENT: PROPOSED SITE PLAN ON SHEET S2.00/C1.00 |
| WAS REVISED. SETBACKS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN AND SETBACKS |
| SHOWN ON THE SURVEY SUBMITTED DON'T MATCH. REVISE AS |
| REQUIRED TO MATCH. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| |
| 9- SHEET S3.00: PROVIDE COMPLETE FRAMING PLANS, DETAILS |
| AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE FRONT |
| PORCH. CLEARLY SPECIFY ALL COLUMNS, BEAMS, ROOF DECK, |
| ETC. NOTE: 1ST FLOOR ROOF PLAN/FLOOR JOIST PLAN SHOWS A |
| HEADER THAT LOOKS LIKE IS FLOATING ON THE AIR. HOW IS |
| THIS HEADER SUPPORTED?. REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. R301.1 |
| FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| RESPONSE: (A) REPEAT COMMENT. CONSTRUCTION OF THE FRONT |
| PORCH IS NOT CLEAR. ACCORDING TO PLANS SUBMITTED IT |
| LOOKS LIKE THE FRONT PORCH DECK ON-THE SECOND FLOOR IS |
| SUPPORTED ON THE AIR. SPECIFY ALL COLUMNS, BEAMS, |
| SECOND FLOOR CONSTRUCTION IS NOT CLEAR EITHER. WHY |
| CONCRETE SLAB AND FLOOR JOISTS?. INFORMATION SHOWN ON |
| FLOOR PLANS AND CUT SECTION ON SHEET S3.00 DON'T MATCH. |
| COORDINATE AND REVISE ALL THE INFORMATION AS REQUIRED |
| TO SHOW A COMPLETE LOAD PATH. |
| |
| (B) IT'S NOT CLEAR HOW THE "FORM AND POUR HEADER" |
| SPECIFIED BY THE FRONT PORCH AREA IS SUPPORTED. IN |
| ADDITION, THIS IS NOT A "HEADER". THIS IS AN STRUCTURAL |
| BEAM SUPPORTING THE SECOND FLOOR ABOVE. |
| |
| 10- PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR |
| GARAGE AND FRONT PORCH ROOF DRAINAGE SHOWING COMPLIANCE |
| WITH SEC. R903.4 AND SEC. R903.4.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| SPECIFY ALL DRAINS, SCUPPERS AND OVERFLOW DRAIN, |
| SCUPPERS. CLEARLY SHOW LOCATION, SIZES, ETC. |
| RESPONSE: MISSING SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE GARAGE |
| OVERFLOW DRAINS AND SCUPPERS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. |
| R903.4.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. AND, THERE IS NO INFORMATION |
| PROVIDED FOR THE FRONT PORCH. |
| |
| 11- PROPOSED SITE PLAN ON SHEET C1.00 DOESN'T MATCH |
| SURVEY SUBMITTED. SETBACKS FOR GARAGE AND MAIN HOUSE |
| DON'T MATCH.REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. SEC. 107.2.1 |
| CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. |
| |
| 12- ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED: |
| A) PROVIDE COMPLETE AND CORRECT INFORMATION ON TOP OF |
| FORM. PROVIDE CORRECT NAME OF BUILDER AND SPECIFY |
| PERMIT OFFICE AND JURISDICTION NUMBER (604700). SEC. |
| R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION |
| (2014). |
| RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. |
| |
| B) NUMBER OF BEDROOMS IS INCORRECT. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION |
| (2014). |
| RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. |
| |
| C) CALCULATIONS NEED TO BE DONE FOR THE ACTUAL |
| ORIENTATION OF THE BUILDING NOT FOR THE WORST CASE |
| SCENARIO. REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 |
| FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. |
| |
| D) COOLING INFORMATION ON ITEM #12 IS INCORRECT. IT CAN |
| NOT BE 18.0 KBTU/HR FOR A 2807 CONDITIONED FLOOR AREA. |
| REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY |
| CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014). COORDINATE WITH THE |
| EQUIPMENT SIZING CALCULATIONS. |
| RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. |
| |
| E) HEATING INFORMATION ON ITEM #13 IS INCORRECT. IT CAN |
| NOT BE 21.5 KBTU/HR FOR A 2807 CONDITIONED FLOOR AREA. |
| REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY |
| CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014). COORDINATE WITH THE |
| EQUIPMENT SIZING CALCULATIONS. |
| RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. |
| |
| F) ITEM #15 IS TAKING THE CEILING FAN AND CROSS |
| VENTILATION CREDITS. NOTE: PLANS DON'T PROVIDE ANY |
| SPECIFICATIONS TO TAKE THESE CREDITS INTO |
| CONSIDERATION. COORDINATE WITH ENGINEER OF RECORD. IF |
| CREDITS ARE GOING TO BE TAKEN, THEN NEED TO PROVIDE |
| COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING COMPLIANCE |
| WITH SEC. SEC. R405.7.6 AND SEC. R405.7.4 FBC-ENERGY |
| CONSERVATION. |
| RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. |
| |
| G) THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS NEED TO BE CERTIFIED AT THE |
| BOTTOM BY THE OWNER OR BY THE LEGALLY DESIGNATED AGENT |
| AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R103.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED HAVE THE NAME OF THE PERSON WHO |
| PREPARED THE CALCULATIONS AS THE OWNER OR AGENT. IS |
| THIS PERSON LEGALLY DESIGNATED BY THE OWNER TO SIGN ON |
| HIS/HER BEHALF?. PROVIDE DOCUMENT SHOWING THAT HE'S |
| LEGALLY DESIGNATED OR OWNER TO PROVIDE NAME AND |
| SIGNATURE AT BOTTOM OF FORM. |
| RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. |
| |
| H) REVISE DOORS INFORMATION. CLEARLY SPECIFY WHERE ARE |
| THE INSULATED DOORS LOCATED . PLANS DON'T SHOW ANY |
| INSULATED DOOR. DOORS WITH GLAZING NEED TO BE |
| INCORPORATED IN TO THE WINDOW AREAS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. |
| R405.5.3.3 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. |
| |
| I) PROVIDE THE EPL DISPLAY CARD COMPLETED BY THE |
| BUILDER AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R405.4.3 FBC-ENERGY |
| CONSERVATION. |
| RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. |
| |
| NOTE: LABELS FOR DOORS AND WINDOWS SHOWING THE U-FACTOR |
| AND SHGC FACTOR SPECIFIED ON THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS |
| WILL BE REQUIRED WHEN THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE NOT |
| USING THE SOFTWARE DEFAULT FACTOR FOR GLAZING. |
| |
| 13- NEW COMMENT: 1ST FLOOR PLAN SHEET A3.00 SHOWS A |
| "FORM AND POUR HEADER" OUTSIDE THE STUDY ROOM. IT'S NOT |
| CLEAR WHY SHOWING THIS HEADER IN THIS FLOOR PLAN. |
| REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. NOTE: |
| COORDINATE WITH SECOND FLOOR FRAMING PLAN. |
| |
| 14- INFORMATION ON THE GARAGE ROOF FRAMING PLAN IS NOT |
| LEGIBLE. THERE IS OVERLAPPING INFORMATION. REVISE AS |
| REQUIRED. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| |
| ***PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESING EACH |
| COMMENT TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. |
| ***PLEASE REMOVE ANY REVISED DRAWING AND INSERT NEW |
| DRAWING. DON'T STAPLE OLD DRAWINGS TO PLANS. SUBMITT |
| OLD DRAWINGS FOR REFERENCE. |
| |
| IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT |
| JULIO GOMEZ |
| COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| BUILDING DIVISION |
| (561)805-6712 |
| [email protected] |