| Date |
Text |
| 2016-12-27 19:06:19 | PLAN |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | |
| | 1ST REVIEW: FBC FIFTH EDITION (2014) |
| | ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561) 805-6714 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | DENIED BY BUILDING |
| | PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW: |
| | |
| | 1) THE WRONG CODE EDITION IS REFERENCED ON THE PLANS. |
| | THIS SCOPE OF WORK IS REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE 2014 |
| | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. |
| | |
| | 2) THE ASSEMBLY NUMBER SPECIFIED ON THE DRAWING U494 IS |
| | FOR A 2-1/2" 25 MSG STEEL FRAME WALL AND THE DRAWING |
| | SPECIFIES A 3-5/8" 18 MSG STEEL FRAME WALL. IN ORDER TO |
| | ACHIEVE THE RATING THE ASSEMBLY HAS TO BE CONSISTENT |
| | WITH THE LISTING. FBC 107.2.1 |
| | |
| | 3) THE DRAWING IS NOT CLEAR AS TO WHICH WALLS ARE TO |
| | HAVE THE ONE HOUR FIRE RESISTANCE RATING. ALL OF THE |
| | NEW WALLS IN THE ATTIC ARE MARKED THE SAME. FBC 107.2.1 |
| | |
| | 4) SHEET A.03 OF THE PLANS THAT ARE ON FILE, INDICATE |
| | THAT THE WALLS THAT SEPARATE THE GARAGE FROM THE LIVING |
| | SPACE HAS A PORTION THAT IS MASONRY AND THE REST IS |
| | 3-5/8" METAL FRAMING. THE WALL ALSO HAS A JOG IN IT AND |
| | IS NOT STRAIGHT AS SHOWN IN YOUR DRAWING. FBC 107.2.1 |
| | |
| | 5) THE ATTIC WALL SECTION SPECIFIES HOW TO ATTACH IT TO |
| | THE METAL STUD WALL BELOW. HOWEVER, IT DOES NOT SPECIFY |
| | THE ATTACHMENT TO THE MASONRY WALL. FBC 107.2.1 |
| | |
| | 6) THE TRUSS PLAN ON FILE INDICATES THAT THE BOTTOM |
| | CORD HAS A NON-CONCURRENT LIVE LOAD OF 10 PSF. THIS |
| | UNINHABITABLE ATTIC AREA IS REQUIRED TO HAVE A 20 PSF |
| | LIVE LOAD IF IT IS USED FOR LIMITED STORAGE. SUBMIT A |
| | SET OF THE TRUSS DRAWINGS FOR THIS AREA TO VERIFY THE |
| | BOTTOM CORD LIVE LOAD. FBC-R 301.5 |
| | |
| | |
| | |
