Date |
Text |
2016-11-28 10:03:15 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE |
| MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: |
| |
| |
| |
| 1) THE SUBMITTED PLAN SHEETS DO NOT INDICATE CONSISTANT |
| ORDER OR COUNT. |
| |
| |
| PLEASE CORRECT. |
| |
| |
| |
| 2) SHEET CVR & A 2 - THE OCCUPANCY LOAD CALCULATION |
| INDICATES FOR BUSINESS @ 30/SQ FT PER THE FBC; HOWEVER, |
| THE FFPC REQUIREMENT IS @ 15/SQ FT, LESS CONCENTRATED |
| USE. THIS WOULD AFFECT YOUR PROPOSED OCCUPANCY LOAD. |
| |
| ADDITIONALLY, THIS WOULD ALSO AFFECT YOUR KITCHEN AREA |
| LOAD. |
| |
| NFPA 101, CHAPTER 7, MEANS OF EGRESS |
| |
| 7.3.1.3 OCCUPANT LOAD INCREASES. |
| 7.3.1.3.1 THE OCCUPANT LOAD IN ANY BUILDING OR PORTION |
| THEREOF SHALL BE PERMITTED TO BE INCREASED FROM THE |
| OCCUPANT LOAD ESTABLISHED FOR THE GIVEN USE IN |
| ACCORDANCE WITH 7.3.1.2 WHERE ALL OTHER REQUIREMENTS OF |
| THIS CODE ARE ALSO MET, BASED ON SUCH INCREASED |
| OCCUPANT LOAD. |
| |
| ASSEMBLY -LESS CONCENTRATED USE 15/SQ FT/PERSON |
| |
| KITCHEN - 100/SQ FT/PERSON |
| |
| PLEASE CORRECT OR MODIFY YOUR OCCUPANCY LOAD |
| CALCULATIONS FOR EACH AREA TO MORE ACCURATELY REFLECT |
| PER THE FFPC. |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| 3) SHEET A 2 - THE PLAN INDICATES TWO EXITS; HOWEVER, |
| THEY DO NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 101, CHAPTER |
| 12, NEW ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCIES & CHAPTER 7, MEAN OF |
| EGRESS. |
| |
| CHAPTER 12 |
| |
| 12.2.4* NUMBER OF MEANS OF EGRESS. |
| 12.2.4.1 THE NUMBER OF MEANS OF EGRESS SHALL BE IN |
| ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 7.4, OTHER THAN EXITS FOR |
| FENCED OUTDOOR ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCIES IN ACCORDANCE WITH |
| 12.2.4.4. |
| |
| 12.2.5 ARRANGEMENT OF MEANS OF EGRESS. |
| 12.2.5.1 GENERAL. |
| 12.2.5.1.1 MEANS OF EGRESS SHALL BE ARRANGED IN |
| ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 7.5. |
| |
| CHAPTER 7 |
| |
| 7.4* NUMBER OF MEANS OF EGRESS. |
| 7.4.1 GENERAL. |
| 7.4.1.1 THE NUMBER OF MEANS OF EGRESS FROM ANY BALCONY, |
| MEZZANINE, STORY, OR PORTION THEREOF SHALL BE NOT LESS |
| THAN TWO, EXCEPT UNDER ONE OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: |
| (1) A SINGLE MEANS OF EGRESS SHALL BE PERMITTED WHERE |
| PERMITTED IN CHAPTERS 11 THROUGH 43. |
| (2) A SINGLE MEANS OF EGRESS SHALL BE PERMITTED FOR A |
| MEZZANINE OR BALCONY WHERE THE COMMON PATH OF TRAVEL |
| LIMITATIONS OF CHAPTERS 11 THROUGH 43 ARE MET. |
| |
| TWO EXITS ARE INDICATED; HOWEVER, THEY DO NOT MEET THE |
| SEPARATION REQUIRMENT: |
| |
| 7.5 ARRANGEMENT OF MEANS OF EGRESS. |
| 7.5.1 GENERAL. |
| 7.5.1.1 EXITS SHALL BE LOCATED, AND EXIT ACCESS SHALL |
| BE ARRANGED, SO THAT EXITS ARE READILY ACCESSIBLE AT |
| ALL TIMES. |
| |
| 7.5.1.3.1 WHERE MORE THAN ONE EXIT, EXIT ACCESS, OR |
| EXIT DISCHARGE IS REQUIRED FROM A BUILDING OR PORTION |
| THEREOF, SUCH EXITS, EXIT ACCESSES, OR EXIT DISCHARGES |
| SHALL BE REMOTELY LOCATED FROM EACH OTHER AND BE |
| ARRANGED TO MINIMIZE THE POSSIBILITY THAT MORE THAN ONE |
| HAS THE POTENTIAL TO BE BLOCKED BY ANY ONE FIRE OR |
| OTHER EMERGENCY CONDITION. |
| |
| 7.5.1.3.2* WHERE TWO EXITS, EXIT ACCESSES, OR EXIT |
| DISCHARGES ARE REQUIRED, THEY SHALL BE LOCATED AT A |
| DISTANCE FROM ONE ANOTHER NOT LESS THAN ONE-HALF THE |
| LENGTH OF THE MAXIMUM OVERALL DIAGONAL DIMENSION OF THE |
| BUILDING OR AREA TO BE SERVED, MEASURED IN A STRAIGHT |
| LINE BETWEEN THE NEAREST EDGE OF THE EXITS, EXIT |
| ACCESSES, OR EXIT DISCHARGES, UNLESS OTHERWISE PROVIDED |
| IN 7.5.1.3.3 THROUGH 7.5.1.3.5. |
| |
| |
| PLEASE PROVIDE FOR THE REQUIRED EXIT SEPARATION. |
| |
| |
| 4) WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE PLAN SHEET |
| REVISION CLOUDS OR NUMBERED NARRATIVE RESPONSES TO THE |
| ABOVE. |
| |
| |
| 5) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED ON THE |
| RE-SUBMITTAL OF THE ABOVE. |
| |
| |
| PETER LEDUC |
| FIRE MARSHAL |
| 561-804-4709 |
| [email protected] |
| |
| |
| |