Date |
Text |
2017-01-04 18:00:27 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| |
| SAMANTHA HILL |
| BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| [email protected] |
| 561-805-6724 |
| |
| FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 5TH EDITION (2014) |
| FBC B = FBC BUILDING |
| FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING |
| FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY |
| FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION |
| |
| FROM PREVIOUS LIST: |
| |
| 1. THIS APPEARS TO BE A CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY. REVISE |
| PLAN TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC EXISTING |
| BUILDING CHAPTER 10. |
| |
| 2ND REVIEW, PLAN REVISED TO STATE THAT THE PREVIOUS |
| OCCUPANCY WAS "INDUSTRIAL". SEE FBC B CHAPTER |
| 10 AND REVISE PLAN TO DECLARE AN OCCUPANCY FROM THE |
| BUILDING CODE FOR . DO YOU MEAN FACTORY |
| INDUSTRIAL (F)? F1 OR F2? |
| |
| REVISE PLAN TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC EB CHAPTER 10. |
| NO INFORMATION PROVIDED. IT APPEARS THAT |
| YOU PROPOSE TO GO TO A HIGHER RISK IN SOME OR ALL OF |
| THE TABLES. WHILE I AM ABLE TO DETERMINE |
| COMPLIANCE IN SOME INSTANCES, NO SURVEY WAS PROVIDED SO |
| COMPLIANCE WITH FBC EB TABLE 1012.6 CANNOT |
| BE DETERMINED. WITHOUT A SURVEY AND OCCUPANCY |
| CLASSIFICATION, COMPLIANCE CANNOT BE DETERMINED. |
| |
| 2. SEE COMMENT 3. |
| |
| 3. OCCUPANT LOAD WAS PROVIDED USING 100 SF PER PERSON, |
| BUT IT APPEARS THAT A PORTION OF THIS AREA |
| SHOULD USE MERCANTILE, SEE FBC TABLE 1004.1.2. |
| |
| 2ND REVIEW, INCORRECT OCCUPANT LOAD FOR MERCANTILE, SEE |
| FBC B TABLE 1004.1.2. |
| |
| 3. 2ND REVIEW, REVISE PLAN TO CLARIFY: |
| |
| BUILDING CLASSIFICATION IIIB; CLARIFY |
| |
| 2ND REVIEW, DO YOU MEAN CONSTRUCTION TYPE? REVISE PLAN |
| TO TERMINOLOGY CONSISTENT WITH THE BUILDING |
| CODE OR PROVIDE CLARIFICATION. |
| |
| 4. FBC 1006.1, MEANS OF EGRESS ILLUMINATION IS REQUIRED |
| IN THE EXIT DISCHARGE. NO LIGHTING IS SHOWN |
| IN THE OUTDOOR AREA WHICH IS A PART OF THE EXIT |
| DISCHARGE. |
| |
| 2ND REVIEW, RESPONSE LETTER STATES TO SEE A2. THIS IS |
| THE DEMO PAGE. SHEET E2 HAS SOME LIGHTING |
| ADDED BUT NOT IN ALL OUTDOOR AREAS. |
| |
| 5. FLORIDA STATE OR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVALS REQUIRED |
| FOR COMPONENTS AND CLADDING, FBC 1609. |
| |
| 2ND REVIEW, DRAWING SHEETS ARE ILLEGIBLE. LOOSE SHEETS |
| WERE ALSO PROVIDED. IT APPEARS THAT THE |
| NOAS WERE NOT PROPERLY BOUND. ONLY ONE PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| WAS PROVIDED (GLAZED DOOR). ANY PRODUCT |
| APPROVALS NOT SUBMITTED PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE WILL |
| BE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED AS A REVISION, |
| WITH FEES. |
| |
| 6. FBC 1011.1, THE EXIT DISCHARGE WHICH GOES THROUGH |
| THE OUTDOOR FENCED PLAY AREAS IS NOT READILY |
| APPARENT. IT APPEARS THAT EXIT SIGNS ARE REQUIRED IN |
| THIS AREA, REVISE PLAN. |
| |
| 2ND REVIEW, NOT ADDRESSED. PLAY AREAS 1, 2, 3 DO NOT |
| PROVIDE A CLEAR PATH TO EXIT. IF THE |
| OCCUPANT LEAVES THE BUILDING AND TURNS LEFT, THEY DEAD |
| END. IF THEY TAKE GATE INTO PLAY AREA 3, |
| THEY ARE ALSO REQUIRED TO BACKTRACK. IT IS NOT CLEAR |
| HOW AN OCCUPANT SHOULD KNOW THAT THEY NEED TO |
| EGRESS THROUGH DOG PLAY AREAS 1 OR 2 TO GET TO THE |
| PUBLIC WAY. A CLEAR PATH TO THE PUBLIC WAY IS |
| NOT PROVIDED, REVISE. |
| |
| EXPLAIN RATIONALE OF FORCING OCCUPANTS TO TRAVEL |
| THROUGH ANIMAL AREAS TO EXIT. IT APPEARS THAT A |
| SAFER MEANS OF EGRESS SHOULD BE PROVIDED. |
| |
| 7. REVISE PLAN TO SHOW EXIT DISCHARGE (PATH OF EXIT TO |
| THE PUBLIC WAY), FOR THE REAR EXIT, |
| INCLUDING THE MEANS OF EGRESS ILLUMINATION FBC 1008. |
| |
| 2ND REVIEW, NOT ADDRESSED. |
| |
| 8. OK |
| |
| 9-10. OK |
| |
| 11. PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR THE CHECK OUT COUNTER, FBC |
| ACCESSIBILITY 904. |
| |
| 2ND REVIEW, THE DETAIL SHOWS THE COUNTER TOP AT 3', A |
| SECOND COUNTER AT 3'6. SEE FBC A 904. |
| |
| 12. REVISE PLAN TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH ACCESSIBLE |
| ROUTE, FBC ACCESSIBILITY 202.4, 206.2. |
| INFORMATION REGARDING THE ENTRY DOOR AND PARKING |
| LOCATION WAS NOT PROVIDED; DOES THE ROUTE COMPLY |
| WITH FBC A 303? |
| |
| 13. SEE IMPACT FEE REVIEW. |
| |
| NEW COMMENT: |
| |
| 14. OFFICE DOOR LACKS MANEUVERING CLEARANCE, PULL SIDE, |
| FBC ACCESSIBILITY 404.2.4.1. |
| |
| 15. PLAN PAGES ARE NUMBERED |
| |
| CVR OF 10 |
| A-0 OF 9 |
| ETC |
| |
| IT IS NOT CLEAR WHETHER THERE SHOULD BE 9 OR 10 PAGES. |
| REVISE TO BE CONSISTENT. |
| |