Date |
Text |
2016-10-28 10:21:10 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| NORTON MUSEUM |
| W. P. B. PERMIT: 16080215 FOUNDATION & STRUCTURAL |
| PERMIT |
| W. P. B. PERMIT: 16050912 BUILDING PERMIT |
| ADD: 1451 S. OLIVE AVE. |
| CONT: GILBANE |
| TEL: 561-236-7052 |
| E-MAIL: [email protected] MICHAEL IZZO |
| E-MAIL: [email protected] MICHAEL J BEAUMIER |
| |
| 2014 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE W 2014 WEST PALM BEACH |
| AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, CHAPTER 1, |
| ADMINISTRATION |
| |
| 2ND REVIEW |
| DATE: FRI. OCT. 28 / 2016 |
| ACTION: DENIED |
| |
| NOTICE!!!!! FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B) WITH RESPECT |
| TO EVALUATION OF DESIGN PROFESSIONALS? DOCUMENTS, IF A |
| LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINDS IT NECESSARY, IN ORDER TO |
| ENFORCE COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE AND |
| ISSUE A PERMIT, TO REJECT DESIGN DOCUMENTS REQUIRED BY |
| THE CODE THREE OR MORE TIMES FOR FAILURE TO CORRECT A |
| CODE VIOLATION SPECIFICALLY AND CONTINUOUSLY NOTED IN |
| EACH REJECTION, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, EGRESS, |
| FIRE PROTECTION, STRUCTURAL STABILITY, ENERGY, |
| ACCESSIBILITY, LIGHTING, VENTILATION, ELECTRICAL, |
| MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, AND GAS SYSTEMS, OR OTHER |
| REQUIREMENTS IDENTIFIED BY RULE OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING |
| COMMISSION ADOPTED PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 120, THE LOCAL |
| GOVERNMENT SHALL IMPOSE, EACH TIME AFTER THE THIRD SUCH |
| REVIEW THE PLANS ARE REJECTED FOR THAT CODE VIOLATION, |
| A FEE OF FOUR TIMES THE AMOUNT OF THE PROPORTION OF THE |
| PERMIT FEE ATTRIBUTED TO PLANS REVIEW. |
| |
| 1) 2ND REQUEST. SEMI-COMPLIED, THE OCCUPANT LOAD IS NOT |
| GIVEN PER FLOOR NOR THE TOTAL OCCUPANT LOAD FOR THE |
| BUILDING. ONLY THE 1ST FLOOR LIFE SAFETY PLAN IS |
| PROVIDED. |
| 1ST ROUND COMMENTS. PLEASE PROVIDE A ARCHITECTURAL |
| SHEET OR LIFE SAFETY SHEET THAT PROVIDES THE CODE |
| ANALYSIS OF THE BUILDING. |
| 2014 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE W 2014 WEST PALM BEACH |
| AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, CHAPTER 1, |
| ADMINISTRATION 107.3.5. MINIMUM PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA |
| 107.3.5.1. COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS |
| 107.3.5.1.1. BUILDING |
| OCCUPANCY TYPES AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF BUILDING PER |
| FLOOR. |
| TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION |
| AREA INCREASES TAKEN FOR FRONTAGE AND FIRE SPRINKLERS |
| FIRE RESISTANCE RATING OF STRUCTURAL MEMBERS |
| LIFE SAFETY FLOOR PLAN / OCCUPANT LOADS |
| |
| 2) COMPLIED. INDEX SHEET SUBMITTED |
| |
| 3) F.S. THRESHOLD BUILDING FL S. S. 553.71(7) THRESHOLD |
| BUILDING". |
| |
| 4) 2ND REQUEST. RESPONSE INDICATES THE ORIGINAL REPORT |
| WAS SUBMITTED BY HAND TO WEST PALM BEACH IS SIGNED AND |
| SEALED. THERE IS NO SUCH DOCUMENT IN THE FOLDER |
| CONTAINING THE ORIGINAL PERMIT APPLICATION FOR EITHER |
| THE BUILDING PERMIT (16050912) NOR THE FOUNDATION/ |
| STRUCTURAL (16080215)!!!!!!!!! |
| |
| 1ST ROUND COMMENTS. SHEET 0277_S003 HEADING FOUNDATIONS |
| INDICATES THERE WAS A GEOTECHNICAL REPORT COMPLETED BY |
| ARDAMAN 12/16/2014. THE SUBMITTED REPORT DOES NOT HAVE |
| AN ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE AND SEAL. NOTE WHEN SUBMITTED |
| ELECTRONICALLY THE SOILS ENGINEER WILL NEED TO SUBMIT |
| UNDER AN ELECTRONIC SEAL PER 61G15-23.005 PROCEDURES |
| FOR SIGNING AND SEALING ELECTRONICALLY TRANSMITTED |
| PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, REPORTS OR OTHER DOCUMENTS |
| (ELECTRONIC SEALS). |
| OTHERWISE ONE PAPER ORIGINAL SIGNED AND SEALED DOCUMENT |
| WILL BE RETAINED AND SCANNED INTO THE SYSTEM. |
| |
| 5A) 2ND ROUND COMMENTS. THE WIND DESK-TOP STUDY FINAL |
| REPORT FROM EWDI 12/17/2015 AGAIN IS NOT ELECTRONICALLY |
| SIGNED AND SEALED NOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER SIGNED AND |
| SEALED DOCUMENT. REVIEW CANNOT TAKE PLACE. |
| |
| 1ST ROUND COMMENTS. COMMENT # 17 FROM THE ORIGINAL |
| BUILDING PERMIT (16050912) DEALT WITH WIND PRESSURES |
| FOR THE BUILDING. THE RESPONSE INDICATES THERE WERE |
| SITE SPECIFIC WIND TUNNEL TEST THAT WERE COMPLETED. THE |
| WIND TUNNEL TEST IS AN EXCEPTION TO SECTION 1609.1.1 |
| WHEN THE TEST WAS IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 31 OF ASCE |
| 7. THIS REVIEW NO SUCH DOCUMENTS WERE SUBMITTED |
| ELECTRONICALLY (SHEET 0284_S010 WIND STUDY REPORT FROM |
| WIND DESK-TOP STUDY REPORT FROM EWDI 12/17/2015). A |
| SIGNED AND SEALED PAPER ORIGINAL CAN BE SUBMITTED ON |
| THE NEXT REVIEW. THE CITY WILL THEN SCAN IN THE |
| DOCUMENT FOR RECORD RETENTION. |
| |
| 5B) . THE WIND DESK-TOP STUDY FINAL REPORT FROM EWDI |
| 12/17/2015 AGAIN IS NOT ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED AND |
| SEALED NOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER SIGNED AND SEALED |
| DOCUMENT. REVIEW CANNOT TAKE PLACE. |
| |
| 1ST ROUND COMMENT. COMMENT # 17 FROM THE ORIGINAL |
| BUILDING PERMIT (16050912) DEALT WITH WIND PRESSURES |
| FOR THE BUILDING. THE RESPONSE INDICATES THERE WERE |
| SITE SPECIFIC WIND TUNNEL TEST THAT WERE COMPLETED. |
| SHEETS S008, S009,& S010 ALL PROVIDE THE POSITIVE AND |
| NEGATIVE PRESSURES FOR ALL OPENINGS BUT THE PRESSURES |
| CANNOT BE VALIDATED SINCE THE WIND STUDY REPORT FROM |
| WIND DESK-TOP STUDY REPORT FROM EWDI 12/17/2015 HAS NOT |
| BEEN SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW. 2014 FBC-B 1603.1.4 WIND |
| DESIGN DATA. THE WIND TUNNEL TEST IS AN EXCEPTION TO |
| SECTION 1609.1.1 WHEN THE TEST WAS IN ACCORDANCE WITH |
| CHAPTER 31 OF ASCE 7. |
| |
| 5C) 2ND ROUND OF COMMENTS INDICATES SEE SHEETS A221 |
| THROUGH A224, BUILDING ELEVATIONS. PLEASE NOTE THESE |
| SHEETS ONLY IDENTIFY THE OPENING NOT THE SIZE OF THE |
| OPENINGS. THE INDEX INDICATES SHEETS A-808 THROUGH |
| A-810 HAVE THE CURTAIN WALL SCHEDULE. |
| |
| 1ST ROUND COMMENTS. UNDER THE STRUCTURE ONLY PERMIT THE |
| PRESSURES ARE GIVEN FOR THE EXTERIOR OPENINGS BUR THERE |
| ARE NEITHER SIZES WIDTH AND HEIGHT OF THE WINDOWS, |
| DOORS, ROOF OPENINGS FOR MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT NOR |
| SKYLIGHTS OPENINGS IN THE ROOF. HEADER AND SILL HEIGHTS |
| FOR WINDOWS AND DOORS ARE ALSO AN UNKNOWN? |
| 2014 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE W 2014 WEST PALM BEACH |
| AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, CHAPTER 1, |
| ADMINISTRATION 107.3.5 MINIMUM PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA FOR |
| BUILDINGS. |
| 107.3.5.1.1 COMMERCIAL BUILDING |
| BUILDING ENVELOPE |
| WALL SYSTEMS |
| |
| 5D) 2ND ROUND OF COMMENTS. THERE WAS NO RESPONSE ON THE |
| 1ST ROUND COMMENTS LEFT BLANK. |
| 1ST ROUND COMMENTS. THE STRUCTURE AND FOUNDATION ONLY |
| PERMIT DOES NOT INDICATE IF THE CONTRACTOR IS ALSO |
| INCLUDING THE EXTERIOR COMPONENTS AND CLADDING TO BE |
| ABLE TO SEAL OUT WIND AND RAIN SINCE THE PRESSURES ARE |
| PROVIDED FOR THE WINDOWS AND DOORS? ARE EXTERIOR BLOCK |
| WALLS AND COLUMNS AND BEAMS TO BE INCLUDED? |
| |
| 2014 FBC-B 1609.1.2 PROTECTION OF OPENINGS, |
| 1609.6.4.4.1 COMPONENTS & CLADDING. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT |
| OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS RULE 9N-3 NOV. 01/ 2010 (31) |
| SUB-CATEGORY OF PRODUCTS OR CONSTRUCTION SYSTEMS THAT |
| WILL REQUIRE PRODUCT APPROVALS: |
| (31)(A) EXTERIOR DOORS/ MULLIONS. |
| |
| (B) WINDOWS/ MULLIONS FOR ALL PRODUCTS WITH GLAZING, |
| PLEASE IDENTIFY THE OPENING WIDTH & HEIGHT, TYPE OF |
| GLAZING, MULLION INFORMATION IF REQUIRED, ATTACHMENTS |
| AND ASSOCIATE PRESSURES FOR EACH OPENING SIZE. |
| |
| (C) PANEL WALLS: STOREFRONTS, CURTAIN WALLS, WALL |
| LOUVERS, EFIS SYSTEMS, |
| |
| (D) ROOFING PRODUCTS AND ASSEMBLIES. FOR ALL ROOFING |
| PRODUCTS PLEASE IDENTIFY ALL ROOFING SUB-SYSTEMS AND |
| THEIR ASSOCIATED PRESSURES FOR ROOF ZONE # 1. REVIEW |
| THE PRODUCT APPROVAL LIMITATIONS, IF ENHANCED FASTENING |
| IS ALLOWED FOR ROOF ZONES 2 & 3. FASTENER DENSITIES |
| SHALL BE INCREASED FOR BOTH INSULATION & THE BASE SHEET |
| AS CALCULATED IN COMPLIANCE WITH ROOFING APPLICATION |
| STANDARDS RAS 117. CALCULATION PREPARED, SIGNED AND |
| SEALED BY A FLORIDA REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER OR |
| REGISTERED ARCHITECT. |
| |
| (F) SKYLIGHTS |
| |
| (G) PRE-ENGINEERED A/C STANDS |
| |
| 5E) FBC 107.3.4.1 PRODUCT APPROVALS. THOSE PRODUCTS |
| WHICH ARE REGULATED BY THE DCA RULE 9N-03 SHALL BE |
| REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF |
| RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. |
| FL 61G1-23.015 (2) THE ARCHITECT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR |
| SUPERVISING AND REVIEWING ALL PROJECT DATA, REPORTS, |
| SHOP DRAWINGS ETC.. |
| 5F) FOR ALL ROOF TOP EQUIPMENT, CURBS OR A/C STANDS, |
| DETAILED ATTACHMENT TO THE ROOF FRAMING & DECK AS WELL |
| AS FROM THE CURB OR ROOF STAND TO THE EQUIPMENT ABOVE. |
| |
| 2014 FBC-B 1604.4 ANALYSIS. LOAD EFFECTS ON STRUCTURAL |
| MEMBERS AND THEIR CONNECTIONS SHALL BE DETERMINED BY |
| METHODS OF STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS THAT TAKE INTO ACCOUNT |
| EQUILIBRIUM, GENERAL STABILITY, GEOMETRIC COMPATIBILITY |
| AND BOTH SHORT- AND LONG-TERM MATERIAL PROPERTIES. |
| EVERY STRUCTURE SHALL BE DESIGNED TO RESIST THE |
| OVERTURNING EFFECTS CAUSED BY THE LATERAL FORCES |
| SPECIFIED IN THIS CHAPTER. SEE SECTION 1609 FOR WIND |
| LOADS |
| 1013.6 MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT. |
| GUARDS SHALL BE PROVIDED WHERE APPLIANCES, EQUIPMENT, |
| FANS, ROOF HATCH OPENINGS OR OTHER COMPONENTS THAT |
| REQUIRE SERVICE ARE LOCATED WITHIN 10 FEET (3048 MM) OF |
| A ROOF EDGE OR OPEN SIDE OF A WALKING SURFACE AND SUCH |
| EDGE OR OPEN SIDE IS LOCATED MORE THAN 30 INCHES (762 |
| MM) ABOVE THE FLOOR, ROOF OR GRADE BELOW. THE GUARD |
| SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED SO AS TO PREVENT THE PASSAGE OF A |
| SPHERE 21 INCHES (533 MM) IN DIAMETER. THE GUARD SHALL |
| EXTEND NOT LESS THAN 30 INCHES (762 MM) BEYOND EACH END |
| OF SUCH APPLIANCE, EQUIPMENT, FAN OR COMPONENT. |
| |
| 6) COMPLIED. THE SOILS REPORT BY ARDAMAN & ASSOCIATES. |
| |
| 7)2ND ROUND OF COMMENTS. PLEASE PROVIDE THE MAIN FINISH |
| FLOOR ELEVATION IN NGVD 29, FROM THAT POINT THE |
| BUILDING CAN START AT 0.00 FT. |
| 1ST ROUND COMMENT. THE SHEET 0285_S120.7 SHOWS AN |
| ELEVATION CHANGE IN THE FINISH FLOOR LEVELS BUT THE |
| PLANS DO NOT PROVIDE AT WHAT ELEVATION EACH FLOOR LEVEL |
| WILL BE. 107.2.1.3 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS REQUIRED. |
| |
| 8) PROVISO: DEFERRED SUBMITTAL. 107.3.4.2. THE |
| UNDERPINNING OF THE EXISTING STRUCTURE, 2014 FBC-B |
| 3307.1. CONTRACTOR TO CHOOSE A SYSTEM AND MATERIALS. |
| SHOP DRAWINGS TO BE REVIEWED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD |
| BEFORE SUBMITTAL TO THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. |
| |
| 9) PROVISO: DEFERRED SUBMITTAL. 107.3.4.2. RESPONSE THE |
| STAIRS AND TIERED SEATING ARE SITE FORMED USING EPS |
| FORMWORK, WILL NEED TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH 2014 FBC-B |
| 2603.4.1.1. SHOP DRAWINGS TO BE REVIEWED BY THE |
| ENGINEER OF RECORD BEFORE SUBMITTAL TO THE BUILDING |
| DEPARTMENT. |
| |
| 10)2ND REQUEST. SPACING OF BAR JOIST VERSES THE SPAN |
| AND GAUGE OF ROOF DECKING. SHEET 0276_S0002 STEEL ROOF |
| DECK. THE STEEL DECK SHALL BE OF THE DEPTH AND GAGE |
| SHOWN ON THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS. PLEASE PROVIDE WHERE |
| COMPLIANCE WITH 2014 FBC-B 2211.5 ROOF SYSTEM DESIGN. |
| |
| 1ST ROUND COMMENTS. SHEETS 0295_S124.7 THRU 0298_S125.8 |
| EACH OF THE SHEETS INDICATE THEY ARE TO 1/8 INCH EQUALS |
| A FOOT BUT THERE IS NO SCALE OR MEASUREMENTS ON THESE |
| SHEETS TO BE ABLE TO SEE WHAT THE CENTER TO CENTER |
| SPACING OF THE FRAMING MEMBERS ARE? THE SPACING OF THE |
| FRAMING MEMBERS FOUND ON SHEET 0295_S124.7 BETWEEN GRID |
| LINES 1.1 & 1.2 AND BETWEEN 2 & 3 IS QUITE A BIT LARGER |
| THAN FOUND ON THE OTHER FRAMING SHEETS. DEPENDING ON |
| THE TYPE OF ROOF DECK AND ROOFING MATERIAL SELECTED THE |
| SPAN LIMITATION MAY BE MAXED OUT IN THE ROOFING DECK AS |
| WELL AS THE ROOFING PRODUCT APPROVAL THAT NORMALLY |
| COMES IN AT A LATER DATE. 107. 2.1.3 ADDITIONAL |
| INFORMATION IS REQUIRED. |
| |
| 11) A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW |
| COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION |
| MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE |
| THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR |
| PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| |
| A THOROUGH REVIEW CANNOT BE MADE AT THIS TIME, AS A |
| RESULT OF THE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED |
| ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY APPEAR THAT WERE NOT PART OF |
| THIS REVIEW. |
| |
| JAMES A. WITMER CBO |
| SENIOR COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DIVISION |
| DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| TEL: 561-805-6715 |
| FAX: 561-805-6676 |
| E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| |
| |