Date |
Text |
2017-07-17 09:53:07 | 3RD REVIEW FBC-2014 MECHANICAL |
| PERMIT #16070916 |
| BUILDING #1 |
| 7/17/17 |
| |
| PLAN REVIEW RESULTS: DENIED. |
| |
| MANY OF THE COMMENTS FROM THE 1ST AND 2ND REVIEW STILL |
| EXISTS. I AM REPRINTING THOSE COMMENT BELOW- PLEASE |
| COMPLY. |
| |
| 2ND REVIEW FBC-2014 MECHANICAL |
| PERMIT #16070916 |
| 6/8/17 |
| |
| RESULTS: DENIED. |
| |
| 1) THE UPLOADED MECHANICAL RESPONSE NARRATIVE WAS |
| COPIED FROM THE BUILDING-4 REVIEW (PERMIT #16070880) |
| AND DID NOT ADDRESS COMMENTS #6-11. |
| |
| 2) SHEET M-2.00: THE DRYER EXHAUST DUCTS IN UNITS A1, |
| A1 ACCESSIBLE, AND A3 ARE NOT PERMITTED TO RUN THROUGH |
| THE MECHANICAL CLOSETS PER SECTION 504.4. |
| |
| 4) THE COMPLIANCE DATA FOR AHU-6 WAS NOT INCLUDED IN |
| THE ENERGYGAUGETOTAL BUILDING PERFORMANCE SUBMITTAL |
| FORM. |
| |
| 5) PLEASE CORRECT OR REVISE THE PLANS IN ACCORDANCE |
| WITH 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS #1, 6, 7, 9, & 11 REPRINTED |
| BELOW: |
| |
| 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 8/29/16 |
| |
| 1) THE SUBMITTED AC CALCULATION PACKET DOES NOT INCLUDE |
| THE AHU-A2/CU-2, AHU-A3/CU-3, AHU-B2/CU-2, AHU-5 (TRASH |
| ROOM) AND AHU-6 (ELEVATOR VESTIBULE) SYSTEMS- PLEASE |
| PROVIDE. A) THE CALCULATIONS ARE INCORRECTLY INDICATING |
| MIAMI AS THE LOCATION. B) REVIEW THE AC SCHEDULE ON |
| M-4.00 AS THE 4-TON SYSTEM AHU-1 SYSTEM DOES NOT MATCH |
| THE AHU-1 SYSTEM SHOWN ON |
| |
| SHEET M-2.00 IN TERMS OF CAPACITY. B) REFER TO SECTION |
| C403.2.1 FBC-14 ENERGY CONSERVATION: A COOLING AND |
| HEATING CALCULATION SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR EACH SYSTEM |
| SHOWN ON THE PLAN, AND ALL SUMMARY CALCULATIONS |
| SUBMITTED BY A REGISTERED ENGINEER SHALL BEAR THE |
| SIGNATURE AND SEAL OF THE ENGINEER. |
| |
| 6) PROVIDE TRASH ROOM AND ELECTRICAL ROOM EXHAUST |
| VENTILATION CALCULATIONS, AND HOISTWAY VENTING |
| CALCULATIONS. |
| |
| 7) PROVIDE A REFRIGERANT PIPING RISER AND INCLUDE |
| PIPING DETAILS- TYPES AND SIZES, TOTAL ALLOWABLE |
| LENGTHS PER THE MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS, AND TYPE |
| AND THICKNESSES OF PIPE INSULATIONS. |
| |
| 9) WIND LOAD DESIGN FOR ROOTOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT: |
| THE CU MOUNTING DETAIL ON M-3.00 IS INDICATING AN |
| INCORRECT WIND SPEED OF150 MPH. PLEASE PROVIDE CURRENT |
| WIND LOAD DESIGN CRITERIA ON THE PLAN, AND SUBMIT THE |
| MIAMI-DADE NOA #13-1017.09 LISTED IN THE DETAIL. PLEASE |
| NOTE THE EOR SHALL PLACE HIS SHOP DRAWING APPROVAL |
| STAMP AND SIGNATURE ON THE NOA AND ALL OTHER |
| |
| NOAS, PRODUCT APPROVALS, OR MANUFACTURER'S |
| SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED AS PART OF THE PERMIT PACKAGE- |
| INCLUDING THE GREENHECK MOTORIZED DAMPER AND LOUVER FOR |
| THE HOISTWAY, AND ALL OTHER OUTSIDE AIR INTAKE AND |
| EXHAUST OUTLET LOUVERS. |
| |
| 11) REFER TO SECTION 3006.2 FBC-14 BUILDING AND CLARIFY |
| IF THERE IS AN ELEVATOR MACHINE ROOM, AND PROVIDE AN |
| INDEPENDENT VENTILATION OR AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEM. THE |
| PLANS SHOW AN ELEVATOR VESTIBULE BUT NO EQUIPMENT IS |
| SHOWN IN THE ROOM. |
| |
| CHRISTOPHER L. COLE |
| MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINER |
| 401 CLEMATIS STREET |
| WEST PALM BEACH FL 33401 |
| 561-805-6719 |
| [email protected] |
| |
| |
| |
| |