Date |
Text |
2016-10-05 10:41:17 | |
| RESIDENTIAL (R3) ALTERATION SECOND BUILDING REVIEW |
| CHECKLIST. |
| CODE: FBC 5TH EDITION (2014) |
| |
| ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| 1- PROVIDE SURVEY SHOWING SETBACKS FROM PROPERTY LINE |
| TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE FIRE RESISTANCE |
| CONSTRUCTION OF SEC. R302.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| |
| RESPONSE: |
| SURVEY SUBMITTED SHOWS 2.7' SETBACK FROM THE PROPERTY |
| LINE ON THE WEST SIDE. ACCORDING TO TABLE R302.1(1) |
| FBC-RESIDENTIAL, 5TH EDITION (2014) NEED THE FOLLOWING: |
| A) OPENINGS ARE NOT ALLOWED. REVISE PLANS AS REQUIRED. |
| |
| B) NEED 1 HOUR FIRE RESISTANCE WALL WITH EXPOSURE ON |
| BOTH SIDES OF THE WEST SIDE WALL. REVISE PLANS AS |
| REQUIRED. PROVIDE FIRE RATED WALL SPECIFICATIONS. |
| |
| 2- PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH |
| THE REQUIRED HEATING FOR HABITABLE SPACES. SEC. R303.9 |
| FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| |
| RESPONSE: |
| COMMENT NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL. |
| |
| NEW COMMENT BASED ON NEW INFORMATION PROVIDED: |
| 3- TYPICAL WALL SECTION A/S2 SHOWS ONLY ONE 2X4 TOP |
| PLATE. EXTERIOR DOOR AND WINDOWS FRAMING DETAILS ON |
| SAME SHEET SHOW DOUBLE TOP PLATES. REVISE AS REQUIRED |
| TO MATCH. TYPICALLY 2 TOP PLATES ARE REQUIRED. ENGINEER |
| OF RECORD TO PROVIDE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS IF ONLY USING |
| ONE TOP PLATE FOR BEARING WALLS. SEC. R301.1 |
| FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| |
| ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| 4- WINDOW SCHEDULE SPECIFIES IMPACT WINDOWS. PRODUCT |
| APPROVALS SUBMITTED ARE FOR NON-IMPACT WINDOWS. REVISE |
| AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| |
| RESPONSE: |
| NOT ADDRESSED. |
| |
| ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| 5- VALUATION DECLARED IN THE PERMIT APPLICATION IS TOO |
| LOW. VALUATION TO INCLUDE ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, |
| CONTRACTOR OVERHEAD AND PROFIT AND ALL DESIGN |
| PROFESSIONAL FEES AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 109.3 CITY |
| AMENDMENTS. REVISE VALUATION AS REQUIRED. |
| |
| RESPONSE: |
| NOT ADDRESSED. PROVIDE COPY OF FULLY SIGNED CONTRACT |
| FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND FOR COPY OF CONTRACT FOR THE |
| DESIGN PROFESSIONAL. |
| |
| 6- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY |
| FAC 61G20-3.002(33) FOR: |
| ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| A) SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS. DRAWINGS SUBMITTED WITH NOA |
| 15-0511.05 ARE INCOMPLETE. PROVIDE COMPLETE DRAWINGS. |
| AND, CLEARLY MARK WHICH MODEL IS GOING TO BE INSTALLED |
| TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE DESIGN PRESSURES. |
| |
| RESPONSE: |
| NOT ADDRESSED. PROVIDE UNCUT DRAWINGS AND MARK WHICH |
| MODEL IS GOING TO BE USED. |
| |
| ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| B) FRENCH DOORS. DRAWINGS SUBMITTED WITH NOA 14-0908.06 |
| ARE INCOMPLETE. PROVIDE COMPLETE DRAWINGS. |
| |
| RESPONSE: |
| DRAWINGS SUBMITTED WITH NEW NOA 13-0328.11 ARE |
| INCOMPLETE ALSO. PROVIDE COMPLETE UNCUT DRAWINGS. |
| |
| ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| C) BARN DOORS AS SHOWN ON PLANS. |
| |
| RESPONSE: |
| NOT ADDRESSED. |
| |
| ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| D) HURRICANE SHUTTERS. AND PROVIDE COMPLETE |
| INSTALLATION SCHEDULE. SEE CITY SAMPLE OR PROVIDE |
| COMPLETE INFORMATION IN ANY OTHER FORMAT. |
| |
| RESPONSE: |
| NOT ADDRESSED. |
| |
| NEW COMMENT: |
| 7- CLARIFY WHY SUBMITTING NOA FOR SLIDING GLASS DOORS. |
| PLANS DON'T SHOW ANY. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| |
| 8- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS |
| REQUIRE3D BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| |
| |
| ***PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH |
| COMMENT TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. |
| |
| IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT |
| JULIO GOMEZ |
| COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| (561)805-6712 |
| [email protected] |
| |