| Date |
Text |
| 2016-06-27 16:23:47 | PUT A CALL IN 3:30 PM FOR MICHAEL FOR AN EXPLANATION OF |
| | SCOPE. NO ACTIVE VOICE MAIL. AS SUBMITTED PLANS ARE NOT |
| | ACCEPTABLE. |
| | MADE A SECOND ATTEMPT AT 4:30 AND STILL NO ANSWER. |
| | PLANS WERE SENT TO SMALL DENIED BIN "M" UNTIL MICHAEL |
| | CALLS BACK. |
| | |
| | REVIEW FAILED AS NOTED BELOW: |
| | 1ST ELECTRICAL REVIEW NOTES |
| | REVIEWED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH: |
| | 5TH EDITION FBC 2014 & NFPA 70 2011 (NEC) |
| | |
| | CORRECTIONS REQUIRED: |
| | 1. SCOPE OF WORK NOT CLEARLY DEFINED ON PLANS. |
| | 2. CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS SECTION 107.2.1 |
| | REQUIRES THAT IN ADDITION TO THE SCOPE OF WORK, ALL |
| | PLANS SHALL HAVE THE NAME AND SIGNATURE OF THE PERSON |
| | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DESIGN. |
| | 3. IF THESE NEW LIGHTS ARE BEING INSTALLED IN A |
| | COMMERCIAL ESTABLISHMENT, LIGHTING CONTROL AS PER THE |
| | FBC-E CODE IS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING, FOR A QUICKER RETURN ON YOUR |
| | RE-SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE A RESPONSE LETTER |
| | (NARRATIVE) ADDRESSING EACH ITEM AND THE PAGE NUMBER |
| | WHERE THE CORRECTIONS APPEAR ALONG WITH THE STANDARD |
| | CITY RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. ADDITIONALLY, PLEASE INSERT |
| | CORRECTED PAGES INTO THE SUBMITTAL PACKAGE. MARK VOID |
| | AND LEAVE THE PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS FOR |
| | COMPARATIVE REVIEW. CLOUDING THE CHANGES WILL BE |
| | GREATLY APPRECIATED. |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE FURTHER QUESTIONS, PLEASE DON?T HESITATE TO |
| | CONTACT ME DIRECTLY. |
| | |
| | THANK YOU, |
| | MIKE ALBARRAN |
| | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER |
| | PH: 561-805-6746 |
| | EMAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
