Date |
Text |
2016-10-27 11:25:22 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) ADDITION/ALTERATION, SECOND BUILDING |
| REVIEW CHECKLIST. |
| CODE: FBC 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| |
| |
| NOTE: |
| BUILDING PLAN REVIEW MAY BE PASSED WITH PROVISO. |
| CONTRACTOR (OWNER/BUILDER) MAY SUBMIT THE REQUIRED |
| INFORMATION AFTER THE PERMIT IS ISSUED BUT BEFORE |
| INSPECTIONS TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. CONTRACTOR |
| (OWNER/BUILDER) TO ADVICE IF PROVISO OPTION IS |
| PREFERRED AT THIS TIME. |
| REVISION FEES MAY APPLY. |
| |
| |
| 1- DETAIL 3/S-1 IS INCOMPLETE: PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS |
| AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE INSTALLATION OF BRICK VENEER |
| SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. R703.7 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| SPECIFY BRICK VENEER SUPPORT AT BOTTOM AND AT OPENINGS. |
| ALSO, SPECIFY WEEP-HOLES, ETC. |
| |
| 2- PROVIDE SOIL TEST REPORTS WITH ORIGINAL SEAL & |
| SIGNATURES (NO COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 471 F.S. |
| |
| 3- PLANS TO SPECIFY THE FINISH ELEVATION OF THE |
| MECHANICAL AND UTILITY EQUIPMENT SERVICING THE |
| BUILDING. NEED AT LEAST 7'-6" ELEVATION. SEC. 94- 546 |
| CITY CODE. |
| |
| 4- ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED: |
| A) BUILDER TO COMPLETE THE EPL DISPLAY CARD AS REQUIRED |
| BY SEC. R405.4.3 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION |
| (2014). REPEAT COMMENT. NOTE: OWNER IS APPLYING FOR THE |
| PERMIT AS THE CONTRACTOR. OWNER/BUILDER HAS THE SAME |
| RESPONSIBILITIES AS A CONTRACTOR. |
| |
| B) COMPLETE THE AIR BARRIER AND INSULATION INSPECTION |
| CHECKLIST ON TABLE 402.4.1.1 SUBMITTED. SEC. R405.4.3 |
| FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014). REPEAT |
| COMMENT. NOTE: OWNER IS APPLYING FOR THE PERMIT AS THE |
| CONTRACTOR. OWNER/BUILDER HAS THE SAME RESPONSIBILITIES |
| AS A CONTRACTOR. |
| |
| C) CEILING INSULATION ITEM #10 DOESN'T MATCH PLANS. |
| COORDINATE CEILING INSULATION INSULATION WITH |
| ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. SEE WALL SECTION 8-8 ON SHEET A-9. |
| SEC. R103.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION |
| (2014). |
| NOTE: CLARIFY IF THE 1901 S.F. AREA SHOWN ON ITEM #6 OF |
| THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED IS FOR THE ADDITION |
| OF THE FIRST FLOOR ON THE NORTH SIDE AND THE TWO STORY |
| ADDITION ON THE EAST SIDE. THE CEILING VENTING AND |
| INSULATION VARIES ON BOTH AREAS OF THE HOUSE. SEE |
| PLANS. ENERGY CALCULATIONS TO MATCH PLANS. REVISE AS |
| REQUIRED. |
| |
| D) ROOF MATERIAL SHOWN ON PAGE 2 OF 4 DOESN'T MATCH |
| PLANS AND PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED. SEC. R103.2 |
| FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014). (REPEAT |
| COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED). |
| |
| E) COMPLETE ALL THE INFORMATION ON TOP OF FORM, |
| INCLUDING BUILDER NAME, PERMIT OFFICE, JURISDICTION |
| NUMBER. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH |
| EDITION (2014). REPEAT COMMENT. NOTE: OWNER IS APPLYING |
| FOR THE PERMIT AS THE CONTRACTOR. OWNER/BUILDER HAS THE |
| SAME RESPONSIBILITIES AS A CONTRACTOR. |
| |
| NEW COMMENTS: |
| F) CONCRETE BLOCK INSULATION ITEM #9 DOESN'T MATCH |
| PLANS. SEE DETAIL #2 ON SHEET A-10 AND REVISE AS |
| REQUIRED. SEC. R103.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH |
| EDITION (2014). |
| |
| G) R-VALUE SHOWN ON THE CEILING INSULATION ON PAGE 3 OF |
| 4 DOESN'T MATCH PLANS. SEE WALL SECTION 8-8 ON SHEET |
| A-9 AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. R103.2 FBC-ENERGY |
| CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| |
| H) CLEARLY IDENTIFY WHERE ARE THE INSULATED DOORS |
| SPECIFIED ON PAGE 3 OF 4?. SEC. R103.2 FBC-ENERGY |
| CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| |
| I) WINDOWS OVERHANG DEPTH AND SEPARATION DON'T MATCH |
| PLANS. REVISE AS REQUIRED.SEC. R103.2 FBC-ENERGY |
| CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| |
| NOTE: LABEL FOR WINDOWS AND DOORS SHOWING THE U-FACTOR |
| AND SHGC FACTOR SPECIFIED ON THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS |
| WILL BE REQUIRED WHEN ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE NOT USING |
| THE SOFTWARE DEFAULT FACTOR FOR GLAZING. |
| |
| 5- SPECIFY THE ROOF PITCH FOR EXISTING PORCH LOCATED |
| BETWEEN THE GARAGE AND MAIN HOUSE TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE |
| WITH THE PROPOSED SHINGLES. ROOF SLOPE MAY BE TOO LOW. |
| REPEAT COMMENT. THE ROOF SLOPE WAS NOT SPECIFIED. |
| ARCHITECT'S RESPONSE LETTER AND DRAWING A-4 SPECIFIES |
| "EXISTING ROOF TO BE REPAIRED AS NEEDED". THIS |
| STATEMENT IS TOO GENERAL. WHAT KIND OF REPAIRS ARE |
| REQUIRED. REPLACEMENT OF ROOFING?. PROPOSED SHINGLES |
| DON'T MATCH EXISTING. IF MORE THAN 25% OF THE SHINGLES |
| OF THIS ROOF AREA NEED TO BE REPLACED, THEN ENTIRE ROOF |
| SECTION NEEDS TO BE REPLACED. PROPOSED ROOF PRODUCT |
| APPROVAL MAY NO BE ALLOWED TO BE INSTALLED BASED ON THE |
| ROOF SLOPE. CLEARLY SPECIFY TYPE OF REPAIRS. TOTAL |
| SQUARE FOOTAGE, ROOF PITCH, ETC. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY |
| AMENDMENTS. |
| |
| 6- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY |
| FAC 61G20-3.002(33) FOR: |
| A) GARAGE DOORS AS SHOWN ON PLANS. DESIGN PRESSURES |
| SHOWN ON FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL FL16546-R6 SUBMITTED |
| DON'T MEET THE DESIGN PRESSURES SHOWN ON PLANS ON SHEET |
| S-6. |
| |
| B) EXTERIOR OUTSWING DOORS AS SHOWN ON PLANS. FLORIDA |
| PRODUCT APPROVAL FL10196-R3 SUBMITTED DOESN'T MEET THE |
| CALCULATED DESIGN PRESSURE ON SHEET S-6 FOR THE DOUBLE |
| DOORS. |
| |
| 7- A) ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN |
| WRITING (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ABOVE PRODUCT |
| APPROVALS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY |
| AMENDMENTS. |
| |
| B) ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) THE FLOOD VENT FLORIDA |
| PRODUCT APPROVAL FL17588 SUBMITTED. AS REQUIRED BY SEC. |
| 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| |
| 8- PLANS TO INDICATE THE FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION OF THE |
| MAIN HOUSE, GARAGE AND ALL THE EQUIPMENT SERVING THE |
| BUILDING. SECTION 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| |
| IMPORTANT: |
| FLOOD ZONE A5: ELEVATION CERTIFICATES WILL BE REQUIRED |
| DURING CONSTRUCTION. |
| |
| ***PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH |
| COMMENT TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. |
| ***PLEASE INSERT ANY REVISED DRAWING AND REMOVE OLD |
| DRAWINGS. DON"T STAPLE OLD DRAWINGS. SUBMITT OLD |
| DRAWINGS FOR REFERENCE. |
| |
| IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT |
| JULIO GOMEZ |
| COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| (561)805-6712 |
| [email protected] |
| |