| Date |
Text |
| 2016-09-19 11:43:35 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE |
| | MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW: |
| | |
| | 1) THE ADDRESS ON THE APPLICATION, 501 EVERNIA ST, DOES |
| | NOT MATCH THE ADDRESS ON THE TITLE BLOCK, 520 DATURA |
| | ST, |
| | |
| | PLEASE CLARIFY/CORRECT. |
| | |
| | SECOND REVIEW : CORRECTED. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 2) DESIGN AREA 2 INDICATES AN AREA OF SPRINKLER |
| | OPERATION DENSITY OF 900. THE ENGINEER OF RECORD PER |
| | THE MASTER PERMIT # 15110807 INDICATES 1500 SQ FT. |
| | |
| | THE SUBMITTAL DOES NOT APPEAR TO HAVE AN APPROVAL FROM |
| | THE ENGINEER OF RECORD PER MASTER PERMIT # 15110807 FOR |
| | THIS CHANGE. |
| | |
| | SECOND REVIEW : CORRECTED. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 3) THE SUBMITTED PLANS ARE NOT BOUND/ORGANIZED. |
| | |
| | PLEASE BIND ALL SHEETS SO THEY CAN NOT BECOME LOST, |
| | REMOVED OR DISORGANIZED. |
| | |
| | |
| | SECOND REVIEW : PLANS REMAIN UNBOUND/LOOSE/UNSTAPLED. |
| | PLEASE SECURE ALL PAGES TO EACH OTHER. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 4) FIRE SPRINKLER SPECIFICATION SHEETS ARE NOT INCLUDED |
| | WITH THE SUMITTAL. |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE SPEC SHEETS FOR THE TYPE OF EQUIPMENT |
| | BEING INSTALLED. |
| | |
| | SECOND REVIEW : CORRECTED. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 5) THE DESIGN AREAS ARE NOT CLEARLY INDICATED ON THE |
| | INDICATING SHEETS. THERE APPEARS TO BE DASHED LINES BUT |
| | ALSO CLOUDED AREAS ON THE SAME SHEET. |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE DEFINITIVE LINES FOR EACH DESIGN AREA |
| | AND REMOVE ANY UNNECESSARY INDICATORS. |
| | |
| | SECOND REVIEW : CORRECTED. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 6) NO DIMENSIONS ARE PROVIDED FOR THE DESIGN AREAS. |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE DIMENSIONS OF EACH DESIGN AREA FOR |
| | VERIFICATION PRUPOSES. |
| | |
| | SECOND REVIEW : CORRECTED. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 7) THE AREAS OF THE OPEN STAIRWAYS DO NOT INDICATE FIRE |
| | SPRINKLER PROTECTION PER NFPA 8.15.4 |
| | |
| | 8.15.4.1* GENERAL. UNLESS THE REQUIREMENTS OF 8.15.4.4 |
| | ARE |
| | MET, WHERE MOVING STAIRWAYS, STAIRCASES, OR SIMILAR |
| | FLOOR OPENINGS |
| | ARE UNENCLOSED AND WHERE SPRINKLER PROTECTION IS |
| | SERVING |
| | AS THE ALTERNATIVE TO ENCLOSURE OF THE VERTICAL |
| | OPENING, THE |
| | FLOOR OPENINGS INVOLVED SHALL BE PROTECTED BY CLOSELY |
| | SPACED |
| | SPRINKLERS IN COMBINATION WITH DRAFT STOPS IN |
| | ACCORDANCE WITH |
| | 8.15.4.2 AND 8.15.4.3. |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE FOR COMPLAINCE OR PROVIDE A DETAILED |
| | NARRATIVE OF EXPLANATION OF WHY IT MAY NOT BE REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | SECOND REVIEW : TWO OF THE THREE ESCALATORS SHOW |
| | CLOSELY SPACED SPRINKLERS BUT THE WEST/MAIN ESCALTOR |
| | DOES NOT. PLEASE CLARIFY AND OR CORRECT WHY THIS ONE |
| | DOES NOT. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 8) ONLY ONE SET OF HYDRALIC CALCULATION ARE PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE ANOTHER SET OF HYDRALIC CALCULATIONS, |
| | ONE PER EACH PLAN SET. |
| | |
| | SECOND REVIEW : CORRECTED. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 9) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED ON THE |
| | RE-SUBMITTAL OF THE ABOVE. |
| | |
| | |
| | SECOND REVIEW : |
| | |
| | 9A) PLANS REMAIN UNBOUND/LOOSE/UNSTAPLED. |
| | |
| | PLEASE SECURE ALL PAGES TO EACH OTHER. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 9B) THERE ARE 5 SHEETS NOTED ON THIS SUBMITTAL. THE |
| | FIRST SHEET IS INDICATED AS 1 OF 4. |
| | |
| | PLEASE CORRECT. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | PETER LEDUC |
| | FIRE MARSHAL |
| | 561-804-4709 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
