Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Permit 16051078
Permit Number 16051078
Review Stop M
Sequence Number 2
Notes
Date Text
2016-09-14 17:23:302ND REVIEW FBC-2014 MECHANICAL
 PERMIT #16051078
 9/14/16
  
 1) 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS #1, 2, 5 & 6 STIL EXIST. PER THE
 ARCHITECT'S NARRATIVE THE REQUESTED EXHAUST VENTILATION
 AND AIR BALANCE CALCULATIONS, AND CORRECTED O/A CFMS
 FOR SOME OF THE ROOMS ARE SHOWN ON SHEET M6.1, HOWEVER
 M6.1 DOES NOT APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN REVISED. PLEASE
 PROVIDE THE REVISED SHEET.
  
 2) REFER TO SECTION 404.1, ITEMS 1 AND 2 AND INDICATE
 HOW THE EXHAUST SYSTEM IN THE APPARATUS BAY WILL
 FUNCTION. VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 404.2 FOR
 MINIMUM VENTILATION RATE, AND THE REQUIRED 0.75 CFM PER
 SQ.FT. RATE CAPABILITY.
  
 3) IN RESPONSE TO 1ST REVIEW COMMENT #3, THE ARCHITECT
 STATES THAT 100% OF THE RETURN AIR TO OARTU-1 IS BEING
 EXHAUSTED. HOW IS THIS POSSIBLE IF THE OARTU IS
 PRODUCING 2160 CFMS OF SUPPLY AIR, AND THE ERV HAS
 INTAKE AND EXHAUST CAPACITIES OF 850 CFMS? AS
 PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED PROVIDE THE LEAKAGE RATE OF THE
 ERV AS INDICATED BY THE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS.
 PLEASE
  
 SEETABLE 403.3 FOOTNOTE G AS IT APPLIES TO THE
 RECIRCULATION OF TOILET ROOM EXHAUST.
  
 4) AS PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED PROVIDE THE FLEX DUCT SIZES
 ON THE 1ST SND 2ND MECHANICAL FLOOR PLANS OR RELOCATE
 THE FLEX TABLE FROM M6.1 TO M2.1 & M2.2.
  
 5) AS PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED PROVIDE REVISED ENERGY
 CALCULATIONS THAT INCLUDE CU-1 & CU-2. A) THE
 PREVIOSULY SUBMITTED CALCULATIONS INCLUDE AHU-5 WHICH
 IS NOT SHOWN ON THE PLANS.
  
 6) REFER TO THE SUBMITTED AC CALCULATIONS FOR OARTU-1
 AND CU-1 & CU-2, AND THE OARTU SCHEDULE. IT APPEARS THE
 OARTU-1 DOES NOT HAVE THE CAPACITY TO PROVIDE THE
 REQUIRED HEATING BTU'S.
  
 7) AS PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED PROVIDE A DUCT SMOKE
 DETECTOR IN THE RETURN AIR SYSTEM OF OARTU-1.
  
 8) M2.1, M2.3 & A-104: PLEASE SHOW THE DRYER EXHAUST
 TERMINATION ON THE MECHANICAL AND ARCHITECTURAL ROOF
 PLANS. SHOW THE LOCATION OF THE DRYER IN THE FLOOR
 PLANS.
  
 9) INDICATE HOW ACCESS IS BEING PROVIDED FOR SERVICE OF
 THE ROOFTOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT- SEE SECTION 306.5.
  
 10) IT APPEARS THAT EF-2 & EF-3 MAY BE LOCATED WITHIN
 10' OF THE ROOF EDGES. VERIFY THE PARAPETS AT THESE
 LOCSTIONS ARE MINIMUM 42" HIGH FROM THE ROOF SURFACE OR
 PROVIDE GUARDS- SEE SECTION 304.11.
  
 11) THE ARCHITECT IS REQUESTING DEFERRED SUBMITTALS FOR
 EXTERIOR MECHANICAL INSTALLATION ENGINEERING AND WIND
 LOAD COMPLIANCE. PLEASE REVIEW THE FOLLOWING WPB
 AMENDMENTS:
  
 A) DEFERRED SUBMITTAL: 107.3.4.2 DEFERRED SUBMITTALS.
 FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, DEFERRED SUBMITTALS
 ARE DEFINED AS THOSE PORTIONS OF THE DESIGN THAT ARE
 NOT SUBMITTED AT THE TIME OF THE
 APPLICATION AND THAT ARE TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE
 BUILDING OFFICIAL WITHIN A SPECIFIED PERIOD. DEFERRAL
 OF ANY SUBMITTAL ITEMS SHALL HAVE THE PRIOR APPROVAL OF
 THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. THE REGISTERED DESIGN
 PROFESSIONAL IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE SHALL LIST THE
 DEFERRED SUBMITTALS ON THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS FOR
 REVIEW BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL.
  
 DOCUMENTS FOR DEFERRED SUBMITTAL ITEMS SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED TO THE REGISTERED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IN
 RESPONSIBLE CHARGE WHO SHALL REVIEW THEM AND FORWARD
 THEM TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL WITH A NOTATION
 INDICATING THAT THE DEFERRED SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS HAVE
 BEEN REVIEWED AND FOUND TO BE IN GENERAL CONFORMANCE TO
 THE DESIGN OF THE BUILDING. THE DEFERRED SUBMITTAL
 ITEMS SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED UNTIL THE DEFERRED
 SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY THE BUILDING
 OFFICIAL.
 B) DEFERRED SUBMITTAL. 2010 FBC 107.3.4.1 PRODUCT
 APPROVALS. THOSE PRODUCTS WHICH ARE REGULATED BY THE
 DCA RULE 9N-03 SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN
 WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL
 FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL.
  
 CHRISTOPHER L. COLE
 MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINER
 561-805-6719
 [email protected]
  


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved