Date |
Text |
2016-09-14 17:23:30 | 2ND REVIEW FBC-2014 MECHANICAL |
| PERMIT #16051078 |
| 9/14/16 |
| |
| 1) 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS #1, 2, 5 & 6 STIL EXIST. PER THE |
| ARCHITECT'S NARRATIVE THE REQUESTED EXHAUST VENTILATION |
| AND AIR BALANCE CALCULATIONS, AND CORRECTED O/A CFMS |
| FOR SOME OF THE ROOMS ARE SHOWN ON SHEET M6.1, HOWEVER |
| M6.1 DOES NOT APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN REVISED. PLEASE |
| PROVIDE THE REVISED SHEET. |
| |
| 2) REFER TO SECTION 404.1, ITEMS 1 AND 2 AND INDICATE |
| HOW THE EXHAUST SYSTEM IN THE APPARATUS BAY WILL |
| FUNCTION. VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 404.2 FOR |
| MINIMUM VENTILATION RATE, AND THE REQUIRED 0.75 CFM PER |
| SQ.FT. RATE CAPABILITY. |
| |
| 3) IN RESPONSE TO 1ST REVIEW COMMENT #3, THE ARCHITECT |
| STATES THAT 100% OF THE RETURN AIR TO OARTU-1 IS BEING |
| EXHAUSTED. HOW IS THIS POSSIBLE IF THE OARTU IS |
| PRODUCING 2160 CFMS OF SUPPLY AIR, AND THE ERV HAS |
| INTAKE AND EXHAUST CAPACITIES OF 850 CFMS? AS |
| PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED PROVIDE THE LEAKAGE RATE OF THE |
| ERV AS INDICATED BY THE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. |
| PLEASE |
| |
| SEETABLE 403.3 FOOTNOTE G AS IT APPLIES TO THE |
| RECIRCULATION OF TOILET ROOM EXHAUST. |
| |
| 4) AS PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED PROVIDE THE FLEX DUCT SIZES |
| ON THE 1ST SND 2ND MECHANICAL FLOOR PLANS OR RELOCATE |
| THE FLEX TABLE FROM M6.1 TO M2.1 & M2.2. |
| |
| 5) AS PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED PROVIDE REVISED ENERGY |
| CALCULATIONS THAT INCLUDE CU-1 & CU-2. A) THE |
| PREVIOSULY SUBMITTED CALCULATIONS INCLUDE AHU-5 WHICH |
| IS NOT SHOWN ON THE PLANS. |
| |
| 6) REFER TO THE SUBMITTED AC CALCULATIONS FOR OARTU-1 |
| AND CU-1 & CU-2, AND THE OARTU SCHEDULE. IT APPEARS THE |
| OARTU-1 DOES NOT HAVE THE CAPACITY TO PROVIDE THE |
| REQUIRED HEATING BTU'S. |
| |
| 7) AS PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED PROVIDE A DUCT SMOKE |
| DETECTOR IN THE RETURN AIR SYSTEM OF OARTU-1. |
| |
| 8) M2.1, M2.3 & A-104: PLEASE SHOW THE DRYER EXHAUST |
| TERMINATION ON THE MECHANICAL AND ARCHITECTURAL ROOF |
| PLANS. SHOW THE LOCATION OF THE DRYER IN THE FLOOR |
| PLANS. |
| |
| 9) INDICATE HOW ACCESS IS BEING PROVIDED FOR SERVICE OF |
| THE ROOFTOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT- SEE SECTION 306.5. |
| |
| 10) IT APPEARS THAT EF-2 & EF-3 MAY BE LOCATED WITHIN |
| 10' OF THE ROOF EDGES. VERIFY THE PARAPETS AT THESE |
| LOCSTIONS ARE MINIMUM 42" HIGH FROM THE ROOF SURFACE OR |
| PROVIDE GUARDS- SEE SECTION 304.11. |
| |
| 11) THE ARCHITECT IS REQUESTING DEFERRED SUBMITTALS FOR |
| EXTERIOR MECHANICAL INSTALLATION ENGINEERING AND WIND |
| LOAD COMPLIANCE. PLEASE REVIEW THE FOLLOWING WPB |
| AMENDMENTS: |
| |
| A) DEFERRED SUBMITTAL: 107.3.4.2 DEFERRED SUBMITTALS. |
| FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, DEFERRED SUBMITTALS |
| ARE DEFINED AS THOSE PORTIONS OF THE DESIGN THAT ARE |
| NOT SUBMITTED AT THE TIME OF THE |
| APPLICATION AND THAT ARE TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE |
| BUILDING OFFICIAL WITHIN A SPECIFIED PERIOD. DEFERRAL |
| OF ANY SUBMITTAL ITEMS SHALL HAVE THE PRIOR APPROVAL OF |
| THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. THE REGISTERED DESIGN |
| PROFESSIONAL IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE SHALL LIST THE |
| DEFERRED SUBMITTALS ON THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS FOR |
| REVIEW BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. |
| |
| DOCUMENTS FOR DEFERRED SUBMITTAL ITEMS SHALL BE |
| SUBMITTED TO THE REGISTERED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IN |
| RESPONSIBLE CHARGE WHO SHALL REVIEW THEM AND FORWARD |
| THEM TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL WITH A NOTATION |
| INDICATING THAT THE DEFERRED SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS HAVE |
| BEEN REVIEWED AND FOUND TO BE IN GENERAL CONFORMANCE TO |
| THE DESIGN OF THE BUILDING. THE DEFERRED SUBMITTAL |
| ITEMS SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED UNTIL THE DEFERRED |
| SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY THE BUILDING |
| OFFICIAL. |
| B) DEFERRED SUBMITTAL. 2010 FBC 107.3.4.1 PRODUCT |
| APPROVALS. THOSE PRODUCTS WHICH ARE REGULATED BY THE |
| DCA RULE 9N-03 SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN |
| WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL |
| FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. |
| |
| CHRISTOPHER L. COLE |
| MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINER |
| 561-805-6719 |
| [email protected] |
| |