Date |
Text |
2017-03-13 15:36:56 | ZONING PLAN REVIEW |
| ___________________________________________ |
| |
| DATE OF REVIEW: 03.13.2017 |
| PERMIT NO.: 16050912 |
| ADDRESS: 1451 S OLIVE AVENUE |
| CONTRACTOR/CONTACT: MICHAEL IZZO |
| TELEPHONE NO.: |
| SCOPE OF REVIEW: NORTON MUSEUM EXPANSION |
| ___________________________________________ |
| |
| REVIEW STATUS: PASSED WITH PROVISOS |
| ___________________________________________ |
| |
| THE SCOPE OF THIS APPROVAL IS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE |
| BUILDING ONLY...AND DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY SITE WORK, |
| LANDSCAPING, ETC. THIS REVIEW HAS BEEN PASSED SUBJECT |
| TO THE FOLLOWING PROVISOS: |
| |
| 1. ANY REQUIRED EASEMENTS (I.E. DRAINAGE, UTILITIES, |
| PUBLIC ACCESS, ETC.) SHALL BE PROVIDED VIA PLAT OR |
| SEPARATE LEGAL INSTRUMENT. |
| |
| 2. ALL CHAINLINK FENCING SHALL BE COMPLETELY SCREENED |
| FROM VIEW UTILIZING SHRUBS, HEDGING, OR OTHER |
| ACCEPTABLE LANDSCAPE MATERIAL. |
| |
| 3. THE DEVELOPER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE |
| INSTALLATION OF IRRIGATION AND LANDSCAPING WITHIN THE |
| RIGHTS-OF-WAY ADJACENT TO THE CSPD, AND SHALL BE |
| RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF SUCH IMPROVEMENTS, |
| IN PERPETUITY. |
| |
| 4. ALL UTILITY ELEMENTS (I.E. BACKFLOW PREVENTERS, |
| ETC.) SHALL BE SCREENED WITH LANDSCAPING TO THE MAXIMUM |
| EXTENT ALLOWED BY THE CONTROLLING UTILITY AGENCY. IT |
| APPEARS THAT THERE ARE CONFLICTS BETWEEN SUCH UTILITY |
| ELEMENTS AND FENCING, ETC. ALL CONFLICTS SHALL BE |
| RESOLVED AND SUFFICIENT SCREENING PROVIDED. |
| |
| 5. IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE SOUTH DIXIE RIGHT-OF-WAY |
| (INCLUDING NEW CURBING, BOLLARDS, LIGHTING, SIDEWALKS, |
| ETC.) SHALL BE SUBJECT TO PERMITTING BY FDOT. |
| MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS MAY BE REQUIRED. |
| |
| 6. ALL IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE JEFFERSON ROAD, |
| CRANESNEST WAY, AND SOUTH OLIVE AVENUE RIGHT-OF-WAY |
| (I.E. ON-STREET PARKING, RESURFACING, ETC.) SHALL BE |
| SUBJECT TO A CITY OF WPB RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT, OBTAINED |
| FROM THE CITY'S ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. |
| |
| 7. ALL SIGNAGE (WALL MOUNTED, FREESTANDING, ETC.) SHALL |
| BE SUBMITTED AND REVIEWED UNDER SEPARATE PERMITS. |
| |
| 8. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY CERTIFICATE OF |
| OCCUPANCY: |
| |
| A. THE PROPERTY SHALL BE RE-PLATTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH |
| ALL APPLICABLE STATUTES, REGULATIONS, AND THE CITY?S |
| POLICIES AND PROCEDURES. |
| |
| B. JEFFERSON ROAD, BETWEEN SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY AND |
| SOUTH OLIVE AVENUE SHALL BE MILLED AND RESURFACED. ALL |
| APPLICABLE PERMITS SHALL BE OBTAINED FROM THE CITY?S |
| PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. |
| |
| C. ANY DAMAGE TO EXISTING UTILITIES RESULTING FROM THE |
| DEVELOPER'S CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE REPAIRED, |
| AT THE DEVELOPER'S EXPENSE. |
| |
| THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS SHALL BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO |
| AUTHORIZING ANY SITE WORK (AS REFERENCED ABOVE): |
| |
| 9. A MINOR AMENDMENT SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE |
| DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT - PLANNING DIVISION |
| PROVIDING DETAILED LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR CONSTRUCTION |
| IMPLEMENTATION. SUCH PLANS SHALL: |
| |
| A. SPECIFY THE EXACT SPECIES AND LOCATION OF ALL |
| TREES, SHRUBS, HEDGES, GROUNDCOVER, ETC. AND BE IN |
| COMPLIANCE WITH ARTICLE XIV OF THE CITY?S ZONING AND |
| LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, EXCEPT FOR THOSE |
| PREVIOUSLY WAIVERS GRANTED |
| |
| B. IDENTIFY THE LOCATION OF ALL TREES/PALMS THAT ARE |
| TO BE RELOCATED ON-SITE; |
| |
| C. IDENTIFY THE LOCATIONS REQUIRED FOR ROOT BARRIERS; |
| |
| I. INCLUDE A SHRUB PLANTING PLAN FOR THE OFF-SITE |
| PARKING LOT LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF SOUTH DIXIE |
| HIGHWAY; |
| |
| II. PROVIDE THE DETAILED LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS |
| PROPOSED WITHIN THE SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY. |
| PLEASE NOTE THAT ANY PLANTINGS SHALL NOT IMPEDE WITH |
| THE SITE DISTANCE AND SHALL BE APPROVED BY FDOT. |
| |
| 10. ALL LANDSCAPING SHALL BE SUBMITTED AND REVIEWED AS |
| A SEPARATE PERMIT APPLICATION, SUBMITTED TO THE CITY'S |
| BUILDING DIVISION. |
| |
| 11. PHOTOMETRIC PLAN SHALL BE PROVIDED AND SHALL NOT |
| EXCEED 1.0 FOOTCANDLES WHEN MEASURED AT THE PROPERTY |
| LINE. |
| |
| 12. THE DATA TABLE ON SHEET L102 SHOWS SIGNIFICANT |
| CHANGES FROM WHAT WAS APPROVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION. |
| MODIFICATIONS SHALL BE APPROVED THROUGH A MINOR PD |
| AMENDMENT, UNLESS TRIGGERING ONE OF THE PROVISIONS OF |
| SEC. 94-207(E)(1) OF THE CITY'S ZONING AND LAND |
| DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. ALSO, THERE ARE |
| INCONSISTENCIES IN THE DATA TABLE, SUCH AS SQUARE |
| FOOTAGE FOR THE MUSEUM. NOTE THAT AN INCREASE IN SQUARE |
| FOOTAGE MAY NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL PARKING, ETC. IN |
| YOUR RESPONSE TO THIS COMMENT PREVIOUSLY, IT WAS |
| INDICATED THAT SOME OF THE EXISTING SHEDS ARE TO BE |
| PARTIALLY DEMOLISHED AND THAT THE NEW SERVICE YARD SHED |
| IS LARGER. THERE ARE A COUPLE ISSUES WITH THIS...THE |
| EXISTING SHEDS ARE LOCATED WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE |
| HISTORIC SINGLE FAMILY HOMES AND REQUIRE APPROVAL OF |
| THE CITY'S HISOTORIC PRESERVATION DIVISION PRIOR TO ANY |
| DEMOLITION / RENOVATION. ADDITIONALLY, THESE WERE NOT |
| COUNTED TOWARD THE NORTON'S PARKING REQUIREMENTS AS |
| THEY WERE NOT DEEMED A PART OF THE MUSEUM ITSELF; |
| HOWEVER, THE SERVICE YARD SHED WAS AND IT'S INCREASE IN |
| SIZE DOES AFFECT THE PARKING REQUIREMENT, ETC. |
| |
| 13. THROUGHOUT THE PERMIT SET VARIOUS TRADES ARE USING |
| DIFFERENT VARIATIONS OF SITE / LANDSCAPE PLANS AS THE |
| BASIS FOR THEIR DRAWINGS. ALL PLANS ACROSS ALL TRADES |
| NEED TO BE CONSISTENT AND MATCH...AND THEY ALL SHOULD |
| MATCH THOSE PLANS THAT HAVE BEEN APPROVED DURING THE |
| PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PD) PROCESS. |
| |
| 14. AS INDICATED PREVIOUSLY, STAFF HAS SIGNFICANT |
| CONCERNS REGARDING SOME OF THE PROPOSED REVISIONS TO |
| THE SITE / LANDSCAPE PLANS, SUCH AS RECONFIGURATION OF |
| THE PARKING / DROP-OFF AT THE CORNER OF JEFFERSON AND |
| DIXIE, PROPOSED HEDGING / FENCING, ETC. THESE ISSUES |
| NEED TO BE RESOLVED, INCORPORATED INTO THE REVISED |
| PLANS, AND APPROVED THROUGH THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT |
| (PD) PROCESS BEFORE PERMITTING SUCH WORK. |
| ___________________________________________ |
| |
| PLEASE NOTE THAT SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED |
| MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| ___________________________________________ |
| |
| QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING: |
| |
| JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER |
| CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT - PLANNING DIVISION |
| 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147 |
| WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 |
| |
| P: 561.822.1448 |
| F: 561.822.1460 |
| |
| E: [email protected] |
| |
| W: WPB.ORG |
| |