Date |
Text |
2016-06-02 15:17:54 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| |
| SAMANTHA HILL |
| BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| [email protected] |
| 561-805-6724 |
| |
| 1. SCOPE IS NOT CLEAR. THE SITE PLAN DOES NOT SHOW |
| LOCATION OF PROPOSED RAILING. POOL BARRIER ENGINEERING |
| WAS SUBMITTED. ONE COPY OF A CONTRACT FOR A BALCONY |
| RAILING WAS SUBMITTED, APPLICATION STATES THIS IS A |
| BALCONY RAILING. |
| |
| FBC 107, REVISE THE SITE PLAN TO SHOW LOCATION OF |
| PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT, WITH DIMENSIONS. |
| |
| IF A FENCE OR POOL BARRIER IS PROPOSED (PLANS MAKE SOME |
| REFERENCE TO BALCONY RAIL BUT ALL CODE REFERENCES ARE |
| FOR RESIDENTIAL POOL BARRIER), PROVIDE EASEMENT CONSENT |
| FOR FENCING PROPOSED IN UTILITYE EASEMENTS. |
| |
| IF A BALCONY RAILING IS PROPOSED, PROVIDE A PLAN WHICH |
| SHOWS COMPLIANCE WITH FBC 5TH EDITION RESIDENTIAL 312 |
| IF THIS IS GOVERNED BY FBC 5TH ED RESIDENTIAL, OR BY |
| FBC 5TH EDITION BUILDING 1013 AND 1607.8 IF FBC 5TH |
| EDITION BUILDING APPLIES (SEE OTHER COMMENTS). |
| |
| 2. NOTE 8, THE PLAN STATES THAT RAILING COMPLIES WITH |
| POOL BARRIER REQUIREMENTS AND ALSO REFERS TO FBC R |
| 5101.17. SINCE THE LAST CHAPTER IN THE FBC 5TH EDITION |
| RESIDENTIAL IS CHAPTER 46, THE PURPOSE OF THAT |
| STATEMENT IS NOT CLEAR. |
| |
| 3. OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION IS NOT CLEAR. ALL |
| REFERENCES ON THE PLANS ARE FOR FBC 5TH EDITION |
| RESIDENTIAL POOL BARRIERS AND BROWARD COUNTY FENCING. |
| SEE BUILDING PERMIT 14110788 FOR THIS BUILDING. THE |
| DESIGN PROFESSIONAL GIVES THIS BUILDING AN OCCUPANCY |
| CLASSIFICATION OF R2. IF THIS IS A BALCONY RAILING FOR |
| R2, NOTE THAT NONE OF THE CODE REFERENCES ARE FOR FBC |
| 5TH EDITION BUILDING. THE PLANS ARE TO SHOW COMPLIANCE, |
| PER FBC 107 CANNOT REFER TO CODE SECTIONS ONLY TO |
| DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE. THE DESIGN CRITERIA IS TO BE |
| STATED ON THE PLAN. |
| |
| 4. CLARIFY ANCHOR SPECIFICATION. NO MINIMUM CONCRETE |
| STRENGTH OR ANCHOR CAPACITY WAS STATED, MATERIAL FOR |
| "CONCRETE SCREW", TYPE OF SCREW NOT SPECIFIED, FBC 107. |