Date |
Text |
2016-04-19 13:16:04 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE |
| MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: |
| |
| 1) SHEET FP 110 A - THE SUBMITTED PLANS INDICATED AN |
| ENGINEER'S STAMP THAT DOES NOT MATCH THE ENGINEER OF |
| RECORD WHICH IS INCONSISTENT WITH FLORIDA |
| ADMINISTRATIVE CODE SECTION 61G15. THERE CAN BE ONLY |
| ONE ENGINEER OF RECORD. |
| |
| 2) SHEET FP 110 A - THE DESIGN SHOWS SEVERAL CHANGES |
| FROM THE ORIGNAL ENGINNER OF RECORD SUBMITTAL. THE |
| ENGINEER OF RECORD SHALL APPROVE BY STAMP OR LETTER THE |
| SHOP DRAWINGS IN COMPLIANCE WITH FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE |
| CODE SECTION 61G15. |
| |
| 3) SHEET FP 110 C - REMOTE AREA # 1 INDICATES |
| 0.100GPM/FT2 AND THE CLACULATIONS SHEETS INDICATES |
| 0.15GPM/FT2. PLEASE CORRECT AND CLARIFY WHICH IS |
| CORRECT. |
| |
| 4) SHEET FP 110 C - REMOTE AREA # 1 LAYOUT IS DIFFICULT |
| TO DETERMINE AS THERE APPEARS TO BE TWO SETS OF BRANCH |
| LINES IN THE SAME AREA. PLEASE CLARIFY OR SHOW |
| ELEVATIONS. |
| |
| 5) SHEET FP 110 C - PLEASE PROVIDE AND INDICATE EXACT |
| DIMENSIONS AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF ACTUAL REMOTE AREA # |
| 1. NO DIMENSIONS ARE INDICATED AND THE AREA IS NOT |
| CLEARLY MARKED. |
| |
| 6) SHEET FP 120 A - ALL THE ROOMS ARE NOT LABELED. ALL |
| ROOMS SHALL BE LABELED OR INDICATED. THERE ARE TWO |
| ROOMS WITH 1 SPRINKLER HEAD ONLY THAT APPEAR TO BE FOR |
| ORDINARY HAZARD GROUP 1. WERE THE CALCULATION DEMANDS |
| OF THESE HEADS CONSIDERED. PLEASE EXPLAIN OR PROVIDE A |
| BRIEF NARRATIVE. |
| |
| 7) SHEET FP 120 A - FLEXIBLE PIPING IS INDICATED. |
| FLEXIBLE PIPING IS NOT INDICATED ON THE CALCULATIONS |
| FOR REMOTE AREA # 2. |
| |
| 8) SHEET FP 120 A - FLEXIBLE PIPING IS INDICATED. SHEET |
| 501 DOES NOT INDICATE SPECIFICATIONS FOR FLEXIBLE PIPE |
| AND NO SPEC SHEETS ARE PROVIDED. PLEASE INDICATE ON |
| SHEET 501 AND PROVIDE SPEC SHEETS. |
| |
| 9) SHEET FP 120 B - THERE IS NO SHEET FP 120 B; A |
| DUPLICATE SHEET FP 110 B IS IN ITS PLACE. PROVIDE |
| PROPER SHEET. |
| |
| 10) SHEET FP 160 A - A NOTE INDICATES REMOVED CANOPY |
| FIRE PROTECTION. PLEASE PROVIDE EXPLANATION OR |
| JUSTIFICATION FOR THIS NOTE WITH THE APPROVAL FROM THE |
| ENGINEER OF RECORD. |
| |
| 11) SHEET FP 160 C - THERE ARE TWO SHEETS INDICATED AS |
| FP 160 C; SHEET FP 160 D IS MISSING. PLEASE PROVIDE |
| CORRECT SHEET. |
| |
| 12 ) SHEET FP 501 - A NOTE INDICATES A WATER FLOW TEST |
| DATE OF 2014. PER NFPA 13, CHAPTER 22, 22.2 WATER |
| SUPPLY INFORMATION, 22.2.1.1* WHERE A WATER FLOW TEST |
| IS USED FOR THE PURPOSES OF SYSTEM DESIGN, THE TEST |
| SHALL BE CONDUCTED NO MORE THAN 12 MONTHS PRIOR TO |
| WORKING PLAN SUBMITTAL. PLEASE PROVIDE UPDATE |
| INFORMATION. |
| |
| 13) SHEET FP 501 - NOTE # 1 - THERE IS NO TRANSFER |
| SWITCH INDICATED ON THE CONTROLLER. EMERGENCY POWER IS |
| REQUIRED AND SHALL BE PROVIDED. PROVIDE A TRANSFER |
| SWITCH AND APPLICBALE SPEC SHEETS. |
| |
| 14) SHEET FP 501 - NOTE # 15 - A 175PSI REGUALTING |
| VALVE IS INDICATED. NFPA 20 DOES NOT PERMIT FOR A |
| REGULATING VALVE/DEVICE WITHIN THE FIRE PUMP SUCTION OR |
| DISCHARGE PIPING. THE REGULATING VALVE/DEVICES ARE |
| PERMITED BY NFPA 14 IN THE STANDPIPE SYSTEM. PLEASE |
| CORRECT AND PROVIDE APPLICABLE SPECS FOR EACH FLOOR |
| LOCATION |
| |
| 15) SHEET FP 501 - ROOF MANIFOLD DRAWINGS OR SPEC ARE |
| NOT PROVIDED OR INDICATED. PLEASE PROVIDE. |
| |
| 16) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED BASED ON THE |
| RE-SUBMITTAL OF THE ABOVE. |
| |
| PETER LEDUC |
| FIRE MARSHAL |
| 561-804-4709 |
| [email protected] |
| |
| |
| |