Date |
Text |
2016-04-22 12:17:57 | FAILED 2ND ELECTRICAL REVIEW |
| REVIEWED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH: |
| 5TH EDITION OF THE FBC 2014 & NFPA 70 (NEC) 2011 |
| EDITION |
| |
| CORRECTIONS REQUIRED: |
| AS INSTRUCTED IN THE EMAIL ENCLOSED WITH THE SUBMITTAL |
| YOU TOLD TO PROVIDE A SITE PLAN INDICATING THE LOCATION |
| OF THE SERVICE EQUIPMENT ON THE PROPERTY. YOU WERE |
| INSTRUCTED TO SUBMIT PROPER LOAD CALCS WHICH ARE A PART |
| OF THE FEEDER DIAGRAM AS MENTIONED ON NEC 215.5. |
| LOOKING AT THE PROPERTY RECORDS, THERE APPEARS TO BE |
| TWO BLDGS. ON THE PROPERTY REMEMBER THAT THE NEC |
| REQUIRES THAT ALL DISCONNECTS BE GROUPED TOGETHER. |
| FURTHERMORE, UNLESS THERE IS A COMMON LAUNDRY FACILITY |
| THERE SHALL BE A LAUNDRY CIRCUIT CALCULATED INTO THE |
| LOAD OF EACH UNIT. THE SAME HOLDS TRUE FOR THE |
| EMERGENCY LIGHTING REQUIRED FOR THE STAIRS. YOU WERE |
| ALSO ASKED TO INCLUDE THE SCOPE OF WORK ON THE |
| DRAWINGS. THE RISER DIAGRAM MEANS NOTHING WITHOUT KNOW |
| WHAT IT IS MEANT FOR. YOU DID INCLUDE THE JOB ADDRESS |
| AND THE NAME AND SIGNATURE OF THE PERSON RESPONSIBLE |
| FOR THE DESIGN. |
| |
| WHEN RESUBMITTING, FOR A QUICKER RETURN ON YOUR |
| RE-SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE A RESPONSE LETTER |
| (NARRATIVE) ADDRESSING EACH ITEM AND THE PAGE NUMBER |
| WHERE THE CORRECTIONS APPEAR ALONG WITH THE STANDARD |
| CITY RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. ADDITIONALLY, PLEASE INSERT |
| CORRECTED PAGES INTO THE SUBMITTAL PACKAGE. MARK VOID |
| AND LEAVE THE PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS FOR |
| COMPARATIVE REVIEW. CLOUDING THE CHANGES WILL BE |
| GREATLY APPRECIATED. |
| |
| IF YOU HAVE FURTHER QUESTIONS, PLEASE DON?T HESITATE TO |
| CONTACT ME DIRECTLY. |
| |
| THANK YOU, |
| MIKE ALBARRAN |
| ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER |
| PH: 561-805-6746 |
| EMAIL: [email protected] |
| |