Date |
Text |
2016-03-03 13:48:12 | PLAN |
| REVIEW COMMENTS |
| |
| 1ST REVIEW: FBC FIFTH EDITION (2014) |
| ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO |
| COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| (561) 805-6714 |
| [email protected] |
| |
| DENIED BY BUILDING |
| PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW: |
| |
| 1) THE PLANS INCLUDING THE ENGINEER'S SEAL AND |
| SIGNATURE HAVE BEEN PHOTO COPIED AND REDUCED IN SIZE. |
| SOME OF THE PRINT IS SO SMALL THAT IT IS ILLEGIBLE. FBC |
| 107.2.1.4 QUALITY OF BUILDING PLANS. BUILDING PLANS |
| SHALL BE DRAWN TO A MINIMUM 1/8 INCH SCALE UPON |
| SUBSTANTIAL PAPER, CLOTH OR OTHER ACCEPTABLE MEDIUM. |
| THIS POLICY MAY INCLUDE SUCH THINGS AS MINIMUM SIZE, |
| SHAPE, CONTRAST, CLARITY, OR OTHER ITEMS RELATED TO |
| RECORDS MANAGEMENT. |
| |
| 2) THE ENGINEER'S ORIGINAL HANDWRITTEN SIGNATURE IS |
| REQUIRED ON THE PLANS PER FAC 61G15-23.002. THE |
| ENGINEER'S SEAL SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 1 7/8 INCHES IN |
| DIAMETER PER FAC61G15-23.001. |
| |
| 3) THE PROJECT IS LOCATED WITHIN 600 FEET OF THE |
| INTER-COASTAL WATERWAY. SURFACE ROUGHNESS D PREVAILS IN |
| THE UPWIND DIRECTION FOR AT LEAST 5,000 FEET. |
| THEREFORE, THIS PROJECT IS CONSIDERED TO BE EXPOSURE |
| CATEGORY D. FBC-R301.2.1.4.3 |
| |
| 4) REVIEW THE COMPONENT AND CLADDING WIND PRESSURES FOR |
| EXPOSURE D AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. FBC-R301.2.1 |
| |
| 5) PROVIDE AN EVALUATION REPORT FROM A FLORIDA LICENSED |
| ENGINEER THAT SPECIFIES THAT THE EXISTING GARAGE |
| FOUNDATION IS CAPABLE OF SUPPORTING THE SECOND STORY |
| ADDITION. FBC 107.2.1 |
| |
| 6) THE WINDOWS OF THE PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR BEDROOM |
| ABOVE THE EXISTING LIVING ROOM ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLY |
| WITH FBC-R310 FOR EMERGENCY ESCAPE AND RESCUE, |
| |
| 7) PROVIDE A DETAIL OR WALL SECTION THAT SHOWS HOW THE |
| NEW FLOOR TRUSSES FOR THE PROPOSED BEDROOM OVER THE |
| EXISTING LIVING ROOM WILL BE ATTACHED TO THE EXTERIOR |
| AND INTERIOR WALLS. FBC 107.2.1 |
| |
| 8) PROVIDE STRUCTURAL DETAILS OF THE MASTER BEDROOM |
| BALCONY AND GUARDRAIL. FBC-R301.1, R501.2 & R312 |
| |
| 9) FBC 107.3.4 - PROVIDE TWO SETS OF PRODUCT APPROVALS |
| FOR THOSE PRODUCTS WHICH ARE REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9N-3 |
| THAT HAVE BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE |
| DESIGNER OF RECORD. PROVIDE TWO COMPLETE PRODUCT |
| APPROVALS WITH FL OR NOA NUMBERS INCLUDING INSTALLATION |
| INSTRUCTIONS AND MAXIMUM DESIGN PRESSURES FOR EACH OF |
| THE DIFFERENT ROOFING MATERIALS, WINDOW/GLASS TYPES, |
| STRUCTURAL MULLIONS AND EXTERIOR DOOR TYPES. NO PRODUCT |
| APPROVALS WERE SUBMITTED FOR THE EXTERIOR FRENCH DOORS, |
| THE FRONT DOOR, THE FIXED WINDOWS AND STRUCTURAL |
| MULLIONS. |
| |
| 10) THE DRAWINGS FOR THE SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS (NOA NO. |
| 15-0512.10) ARE MISSING INFORMATION. IT APPEARS THAT |
| THE DRAWINGS WERE NOT SHRUNK TO FIT ON THE SMALLER |
| PAPER WHEN THEY WERE PRINTED. FBC 107.2.1 |
| |
| 11) SPECIFY THE METHOD OF ATTACHMENT THAT WILL BE USED |
| TO INSTALL THE CEMENT ROOF TILES (NOA NO. 15-0223.18) |
| AND RESIST THE REQUIRED OVERTURN MOMENT. IF A ROOF TILE |
| ADHESIVE WILL BE USED PROVIDE TWO COPIES OF THE PRODUCT |
| APPROVALS FOR IT. |
| |
| 12) IN ORDER TO REDUCE PLAN REVIEW TIME, PLEASE SUBMIT |
| A RESPONSE LETTER INDICATING HOW EACH OF THE REVIEW |
| COMMENTS HAS BEEN ADDRESSED. |
| |
| |
| |
| |