Date |
Text |
2016-02-29 19:59:31 | 2ND ELECTRICAL REVIEW NOTES FOR REVISION #:16010443 |
| REVIEWED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH: |
| FBC 2010 EDITION |
| NFPA 70 2011 (NEC) |
| |
| THESE PLANS WERE INITIALLY REVIEWED ON 1/22/16 AND |
| BELOW ARE YOUR RESPONSES TO THE INITIAL REVIEW |
| COMMENTS. YOU WILL FIND THAT FURTHER CORRECTIONS STILL |
| REMAINING. PLEASE SEE THE NOTE BELOW AND IF YOU HAVE |
| ANY QUESTIONS CONTACT ME. |
| |
| CORRECTIONS REQUIRED: |
| 1. YOU WERE ASKED TO REVISE THE PLAN TO UPDATE THE |
| INCORRECTLY QUOTED CODE AND YOU RESPONDED THAT THIS WAS |
| NOT PART OF THE SCOPE. THE PLANS SHALL INDICATE THE |
| CODE CYCLE TO WHICH THE WORK WILL BE PERFORMED. |
| 2. RESPONSE ACCEPTED |
| 3. PER NEC 110.12, WORK SHALL BE CONDUCTED IN A NEAT |
| AND WORKMANLIKE MANNER AND FOR THE SAFETY OF THE PUBLIC |
| ALL SHARP ENDS OF THE UNI-STRUT CHANNELS SHALL BE |
| PROTECTED. |
| 4. NEC 110.27, REQUIRES THAT YOU PROVIDE PHYSICAL |
| PROTECTION ABOUT THE NEW ELECTRICAL APPARATUS. IT IS IN |
| A VERY VULNERABLE LOCATION EXPOSED TO VEHICULAR |
| TRAFFIC. |
| 5. RESPONSE ACCEPTED |
| 6. RESPONSE ACCEPTED |
| 7. RESPONSE ACCEPTED. |
| 8. |
| WHEN RESUBMITTING, FOR A QUICKER RETURN ON YOUR |
| RE-SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE A RESPONSE LETTER |
| (NARRATIVE) ADDRESSING EACH ITEM AND THE PAGE NUMBER |
| WHERE THE CORRECTIONS APPEAR ALONG WITH THE STANDARD |
| CITY RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. ADDITIONALLY, PLEASE INSERT |
| CORRECTED PAGES INTO THE SUBMITTAL PACKAGE. MARK VOID |
| AND LEAVE THE PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS FOR |
| COMPARATIVE REVIEW. CLOUDING THE CHANGES WILL BE |
| GREATLY APPRECIATED. |
| |
| IF YOU HAVE FURTHER QUESTIONS, PLEASE DON?T HESITATE TO |
| CONTACT ME DIRECTLY. |
| |
| THANK YOU, |
| MIKE ALBARRAN |
| ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER |
| PH: 561-805-6746 |
| EMAIL: [email protected] |
| |
2016-02-02 10:45:22 | 2/2/16 SPOKE W/SCOTT ABOUT NOTES REQUIRED ON PLANS. HE |
| WILL REVISE AND SUBMIT. FILE RETURNED TO SMALL DENIED |
| "C". MA |
| |