Date |
Text |
2018-06-15 12:36:12 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE |
| MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: |
| |
| |
| |
| 1) SHEET A 1.1 - THE DOUBLE WALL SEPARATING THE |
| EXISTING OCCUPANY DOES NOT INDICATE A FIRE RATING OR |
| LISTING. IS IT THE INTENT TO HAVE THIS WALL NONRATED? |
| |
| PER NFPA 101, CHAPTER 6 |
| |
| 6.1.14.4 SEPARATED OCCUPANCIES. (SEE ALSO 6.1.14.1.2.) |
| 6.1.14.4.1 WHERE SEPARATED OCCUPANCIES ARE PROVIDED, |
| EACH PART OF THE |
| BUILDING COMPRISING A DISTINCT OCCUPANCY, AS DESCRIBED |
| IN THIS CHAPTER, |
| SHALL BE COMPLETELY SEPARATED FROM OTHER OCCUPANCIES BY |
| FIRE-RESISTIVE |
| ASSEMBLIES, AS SPECIFIED IN 6.1.14.4.2, 6.1.14.4.3, |
| TABLE 6.1.14.4.1(A), |
| AND TABLE 6.1.14.4.1(B), UNLESS SEPARATION IS PROVIDED |
| BY APPROVED |
| EXISTING SEPARATIONS OR AS OTHERWISE PERMITTED BY |
| 6.1.14.4.6. |
| |
| PLEASE REVIEW AND CORRECT OR PROVIDE JUSTIFICATION WITH |
| SPECIFIC CODE REFERENCES. |
| |
| |
| 2) SHEET A 1.1 - TWO SETS OF DOUBLE DOORS ARE INDICATED |
| ON THE OTHER EXISTING OCCUPANCY THAT DOES NOT INDICATE |
| A FIRE RATING. IS IT THE INTENT TO CONNECT THESE SPACES |
| AS ONE OCCUPANCY? IS IT THE INTENT TO SEPARATED THESE |
| TWO SPACES AT SOME TIME IN THE FUTURE? IF FUTURE |
| SEPARATION IS INTEND, THIS WALL SHOULD CARRY A FIRE |
| RATING. |
| |
| PLEASE REVIEW AND ADDRESS. |
| |
| |
| 3) WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE PLAN SHEET |
| REVISION CLOUDS OR NUMBERED NARRATIVE RESPONSES TO THE |
| ABOVE. |
| |
| |
| 4) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED ON THE |
| RE-SUBMITTAL OF THE ABOVE. |
| |
| |
| |
| PETER LEDUC |
| FIRE MARSHAL |
| 561-804-4709 |
| [email protected] |
| |
| |
| |