Date |
Text |
2016-01-28 18:35:48 | NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (R3), BUILDING REVIEW |
| COMMENTS. |
| CODE: FBC 5TH EDITION (2014) |
| |
| NOTE: |
| BUILDING REVIEW MAY BE APPROVED WITH PROVISO. REVISION |
| FEES MAY APPLY. CONTRACTOR TO ADVICE IF PROVISO OPTION |
| IS ACCEPTABLE. |
| |
| 1- ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED ARE TAKING THE CROSS |
| VENTILATION CREDIT. PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION |
| SHOWING HOW THE PLANS COMPLY WITH ALL THE REQUIREMENTS |
| OF SEC. R405.7.4 OF FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH |
| EDITION (2014). |
| |
| 2- ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED: |
| A) ITEM #5 OF ENERGY CALCULATIONS STATE THAT THE |
| CALCULATIONS ARE NO WORST CASE SCENARIO, BUT PAGE 2 OF |
| 4 STATES THAT HOUSE WAS ROTATED 90 DEGREES. THIS IS NOT |
| CLEAR. REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY |
| AMENDMENTS. |
| NOTE: ENERGY CALCULATIONS MAY BE DONE FOR WORST CASE |
| SCENARIO, BUT EQUIPMENT SIZING CALCULATIONS NEED TO BE |
| DONE TO THE ACTUAL ORIENTATION OF THE BUILDING. |
| |
| B) OWNER/AGENT TO CERTIFY AND DATE BOTTOM OF FORM AS |
| REQUIRED BY SEC. R103.1.1.2 OF FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, |
| 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| |
| C) REVISE THE CLIMATE ZONE SHOWN ON PAGE 2 OF 4. SEE |
| TABLE C301.1 OF FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION |
| (2014). |
| |
| D) REVISE THE TYPE OF ROOF SHOWN ON PAGE 2 OF 4. PLANS |
| SUBMITTED DON'T SHOW HIP ROOF. SEC. R103.2 OF |
| FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| |
| E) REVISE THE WINDOWS OVERHANG DEPTH AND SEPARATION TO |
| MATCH PLANS. SEC. R103.1.1.2 OF FBC-ENERGY |
| CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| |
| F) COMPLETE THE CHECK LIST ON TABLE 402.4.1.1 |
| SUBMITTED. |
| |
| G) COMPLETE THE ENERGY PERFORMANCE LEVEL (EPL) DISPLAY |
| CARD SUBMITTED. |
| |
| NOTE: |
| LABEL FOR DOORS AND WINDOWS SHOWING THE U-FACTOR AND |
| SHGC FACTOR SPECIFIED ON THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS WILL |
| BE REQUIRED WHEN THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE NOT USING |
| THE SOFTWARE DEFAULT FACTOR FOR GLAZING. |
| |
| 3- WINDOW AND DOOR SCHEDULE ON SHEET A-3.0: ENTRY DOOR |
| SAYS "NR". CLARIFY WHY THE ENTRY DOOR DOESN'T HAVE TO |
| COMPLY WITH THE EGRESS REQUIREMENTS. SEC. R11 OF |
| FBC-RESIDENTIAL, 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| |
| 4- VALUATION DECLARED IN THE PERMIT APPLICATION IS TOO |
| LOW. VALUATION WAS UPDATED TO $150,000. THE PERMIT FEE |
| BALANCE IS $973.38. SEC. 109.3 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| |
| 5- REVISE THE DESIGN PARAMETERS NOTE ON SHEET A-3.0: |
| THE BUILDING DOESN'T HAVE A HIP ROOF. THE DESIGN |
| PRESSURES ON A HIP ROOF AND A GABLE ROOF ARE DIFFERENT. |
| REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. R301 OF FBC-RESIDENTIAL, 5TH |
| EDITION (2014). |
| |
| 6- SIZE OF FOOTING S1 SHOWN ON SHEET S-1.0 DOESN'T |
| MATCH SIZE SHOWN ON TYPICAL WALL SECTION. |
| REVISE/CLARIFY AS REQUIRED. WHICH ONE IS THE CORRECT |
| SIZE?. SEC. R301 OF FBC-RESIDENTIAL, 5TH EDITION |
| (2014). |
| |
| 7- RE-SUBMIT PRODUCT APPROVAL REQUIRED BY FAC |
| 61G20-3.002(33) FOR: EXTERIOR DOORS. FLORIDA PRODUCT |
| APPROVAL FL11136-R1 SUBMITTED IS FOR THE 2010 CODE |
| VERSION. NEED THE CURRENT 2014 CODE VERSION. |
| NOTE: REVISE ALL PRODUCT APPROVAL NUMBERS ON SHEET |
| A-3.0 AS WELL. |
| |
| 8- DESIGNER OF RECORD TO APPROVED ABOVE PRODUCT |
| APPROVALS PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL. SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY |
| AMENDMENTS. |
| |
| 9- REVISE SURVEY. BUILDING IS LOCATED IN FLOOD ZONE "B" |
| NOT "C". SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| |
| 10- PROVIDE SOIL TEST REPORT AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R401.4 |
| OF FBC-RESIDENTIAL, 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| |
| ***PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSIGN EACH |
| COMMENT TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. |
| |
| IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT |
| JULIO GOMEZ |
| COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| (561)805-6712 |
| [email protected] |
| |
| |