Date |
Text |
2015-12-04 10:28:30 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE |
| MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: |
| |
| 1. SHEET AO - INDICATES AND OCCUPANY LOAD OF SPACE # 1 |
| AS 42. SHEET A1.1 INDICATES AN OCCUPANY LOAD OF |
| 36+2+14= 52. PLEASE CORRECT. |
| |
| 2. SHEET A 3.1 - WITHIN THE TRAINING ROOM (AN ASSEMBLY |
| SPACE) IT INDICATES AN OCCUPANY LOAD OF 36, EQUALING |
| THE CHAIR COUNT. NO DIMENSIONS OR OCCUPANY LOAD |
| CLASSIFICATION CALCULATION ARE PROVIDED FOR THIS SPACE. |
| PLEASE PROVIDE. |
| |
| 3. SHEET 3.1 - DOOR # 5 MAYBE REQUIRED TO SWING IN THE |
| DIRECTION OF EGRESS BASED ON THE SUBMITTAL INFORMATION |
| OF # 2 ABOVE. PER SECTION NFPA 101, DOOR SWING |
| DIRECTION, 7.2.1.4.2, DOOR IS REQUIRED TO SWING IN THE |
| DIRECTION OF EGRESS TRAVEL FOR AN OCCUPANT LOAD OF 50 |
| OR GREATER PERSONS. |
| |
| 4. SHEET A3.1 - DOOR # 3 SWING INTO THE EGRESS |
| CORRIDOR. PER NFPA 101 CHAPTER 7, MEANS OF EGRESS |
| 7.2.1.4.3 DOOR LEAF ENCROACHMENT |
| 7.2.1.4.3.1 DURING ITS SWING, ANY DOOR LEAF IN A MEANS |
| OF EGRESS SHALL LEAVE NOT LESS THAN ONE-HALF OF THE |
| REQUIRED WIDTH OF AN AISLE, A CORRIDOR, A PASSAGEWAY, |
| OR A LANDING UNOBSTRUCTED AND SHALL NOT PROJECT NOT |
| MORE THAN 7 IN. INTO THE REQUIRED WIDTH OF AN AISLE, A |
| CORRIDOR, A PASSAGE WAY, OR A LANDING, WHEN FULLY OPEN, |
| UNLESS BOTH OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS ARE MET: |
| (1) THE DOOR OPENING PROVIDES ACCESS TO A STAIR IN AN |
| EXISTING BUILDING. |
| (2) THE DOOR OPENING MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS THAT LIMITS |
| PROJECTION TO NOT MORE THAN 7 IN. INTO THE REQUIRED |
| WIDTH OF THE STAIR LANDING WHEN THE DOOR LEAF IS FULLY |
| OPEN. |
| |