| Date |
Text |
| 2016-02-12 09:39:19 | 3RD REVIEW: FBC 2014 MECHANICAL |
| | PERMIT #15090397: MODEL B- #744. |
| | 2/11/16 |
| | |
| | 1) THERE ARE SEVERAL CONFLICTS BETWEEN THE AC COOLING |
| | LOAD CALCULATIONS, THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS AND THE AC |
| | PLANS. |
| | A) THE AC CALCULATIONS INDICATE TWO ZONES WITH |
| | CALCULATED COOLING LOADS OF 2.0 ON THE 1ST LEVEL, AND |
| | 3.8 TONS ON THE 2ND AND 3RD LEVELS. ON SHEET M201, |
| | HOWEVER, 3-TON AND 4-TON SYSTEMS ARE SHOWN FOR UNIT |
| | #744, AND ON M301 TWO 4-TON SYSTEMS ARE SHOWN (NOTE |
| | THAT A 4-TON SYSTEM IS USED TO SUPPLY THE 1ST AND 2ND |
| | LEVEL WHICH CONFLICTS WITH THE CALCS). PLEASE CORRECT |
| | AND ALSO REFER TO SECTION R403.6.1.1 FBC-14 ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION WHICH PROHIBITS OVERSIZING OF AC SYSTEMS |
| | GREATER THAN 1.15 TIMES THE CALCULATED LOAD. |
| | B) THE SUBMITTED ENERGY CALCULATION FORM R405-2014 |
| | SHOWS COMPLIANCE DATA FOR A SINGLE COOLING SYSTEM WHICH |
| | APPEARS TO ACTUALLY BE COMPLIANCE DATA FOR BOTH OF THE |
| | AC SYSTEMS( 3-TON & 4-TON) COMBINED AND AVERAGED. |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLIANCE DATA FOR EACH INDIVIDUAL |
| | SYSTEM AND, AS NOTED ABOVE, COMPARE WITH THE PLANS |
| | WHICH INDICATES TWO 4-TON SYSTEMS. |
| | C) THE AC CALCULATIONS FORM IS INDICATING THE FRONT |
| | DOOR FACES EAST HOWEVER THE FRONT DOOR IS FACING NORTH. |
| | 2) SHEET: M301: THE MAIN RETURN DUCT SIZES FROM THE |
| | 18X18" GRILL AND THE14X14" GRILLS ARE NOT SHOWN. |
| | |
| | CHRISTOPHER L. COLE |
| | MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6719 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
