| Date |
Text |
| 2015-12-22 16:37:46 | PLAN |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW: FBC FIFTH EDITION (2014) |
| | ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561) 805-6714 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | DENIED BY BUILDING |
| | PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW: |
| | |
| | 1) THE SURVEY SPECIFIES THE PROPERTY AS BEING IN FLOOD |
| | ZONE B WHEN IT IS ACTUALLY IN FLOOD ZONE C. IF NOT |
| | CORRECTED, THIS MAY RESULT IN THE HOMEOWNERS PAYING |
| | MORE FOR FLOOD INSURANCE. |
| | I DID NOT FIND THE NEW SURVEY THAT WAS REFERENCED IN |
| | YOUR RESPONSE LETTER IN THE RE-SUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | 2) SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC-R806.1 VENTILATION |
| | REQUIRED. ENCLOSED ATTICS AND ENCLOSED RAFTER SPACES |
| | FORMED WHERE CEILINGS ARE APPLIED DIRECTLY TO THE |
| | UNDERSIDE OF ROOF RAFTERS SHALL HAVE CROSS VENTILATION |
| | FOR EACH SEPARATE SPACE BY VENTILATING OPENINGS |
| | PROTECTED AGAINST THE ENTRANCE OF RAIN OR SNOW. |
| | VENTILATION OPENINGS SHALL HAVE A LEAST DIMENSION OF |
| | 1/16 INCH MINIMUM AND 1/4 INCH MAXIMUM. VENTILATION |
| | OPENINGS HAVING A LEAST DIMENSION LARGER THAN 1/4 INCH |
| | SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH CORROSION-RESISTANT WIRE CLOTH |
| | SCREENING, HARDWARE CLOTH, OR SIMILAR MATERIAL WITH |
| | OPENINGS HAVING A LEAST DIMENSION OF 1/16 INCH MINIMUM |
| | AND 1/4 INCH MAXIMUM. OPENINGS IN ROOF FRAMING MEMBERS |
| | SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION R802.1.8. |
| | REQUIRED VENTILATION OPENINGS SHALL OPEN DIRECTLY TO |
| | THE OUTSIDE AIR. CALCULATIONS FOR THE REQUIRED AREA OF |
| | VENTILATION OPENINGS WERE ADDED TO THE PLANS. I DID NOT |
| | SEE THE LOCATIONS AND SIZES OF THE VENT OPENINGS SHOWN |
| | ON THE PLANS. |
| | |
| | 3) FBC 107.3.4 - PROVIDE TWO SETS OF PRODUCT APPROVALS |
| | FOR THOSE PRODUCTS WHICH ARE REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9N-3 |
| | THAT HAVE BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE |
| | DESIGNER OF RECORD. PROVIDE TWO COMPLETE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS WITH FL OR NOA NUMBERS INCLUDING INSTALLATION |
| | INSTRUCTIONS AND MAXIMUM DESIGN PRESSURES FOR EACH OF |
| | THE DIFFERENT ROOFING MATERIALS, WINDOW/GLASS TYPES, |
| | STRUCTURAL MULLIONS AND EXTERIOR DOOR TYPES (INCLUDING |
| | SECTIONAL GARAGE DOORS). |
| | THE FOLLOWING IS A LINK TO THE MIAMI - DADE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL WEBSITE. |
| | HTTP://WWW.MIAMIDADE.GOV/BUILDING/PC-SEARCH_APP.ASP |
| | THE FOLLOWING IS A LINK TO THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | WEBSITE. |
| | HTTPS://FLORIDABUILDING.ORG/PR/PR_APP_SRCH.ASPX |
| | |
| | 4) THE ENERGY PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM CONTAINS |
| | ERRORS AND IS MISSING INFORMATION. THE FORMS REQUIRE |
| | THE SIGNATURE OF THE OWNER/AGENT. THE STREET IS LAKE |
| | AVE. AND NOT LAKE WORTH AVE. THE CITY IS WEST PALM |
| | BEACH AND NOT LANTANA. THE JURIDICTION NUMBER IS |
| | 604700. THE UNITS DO NOT MEET THE CRITERIA IN FBC |
| | ENERGY CONSERVATION SECTION R405.7.4 TO USE THE CROSS |
| | VENTILATION OPTION CREDIT. THE FORMS SPECIFY AN |
| | UNVENTED ATTIC AND THE PLANS SHOW A VENTILATED ATTIC. |
| | THE FORMS SPECIFY A CONCRETE ROOF AND THE PLANS HAVE A |
| | PLYWOOD ROOF WITH ASPHALT ROOFING. |
| | |
| | 5) ACCORDING TO THE DRAWING INDEX ON SHEET CV-1.0, |
| | SHEET A-6.0 IS MISSING. SHEETS 1-4 FROM FRANCIS |
| | ENGINEERING ( FIRE SPRINKLER PLANS? ) ARE ALSO MISSING. |
| | |
| | 6) IN ORDER TO REDUCE PLAN REVIEW TIME, PLEASE SUBMIT A |
| | RESPONSE LETTER INDICATING HOW EACH OF THE REVIEW |
| | COMMENTS HAS BEEN ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 7) THE SIGNATURE OF THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER APPEARS TO |
| | BE A FASCIMILE. FLORIDA STATUTES REQUIRE THAT ALL |
| | DRAWINGS AND DOCUMENTS FROM ENGINEERS, AS WELL AS, |
| | ARCHITECTS THAT ARE SUBMITTED FOR PUBLIC RECORD HAVE |
| | THEIR HANDWRITTEN SIGNATURES ON THEM IN ADDITION TO |
| | THEIR SEALS. FAC 61G15-23.002 AND 61G1-16.003 |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
