| Date |
Text |
| 2016-02-12 12:45:49 | 3RD REVIEW: FBC 2014 MECHANICAL |
| | PERMIT #15081154: MODEL A- #1200. |
| | 2/12/16 |
| | |
| | 1) THERE ARE SEVERAL CONFLICTS BETWEEN THE AC COOLING |
| | LOAD CALCULATIONS, THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS AND THE AC |
| | PLANS. |
| | A) THE AC CALCULATIONS INDICATE A 4-TON LOAD FOR AC |
| | A-01 WHICH IS CONDITIONING THE 1ST LEVEL, HOWEVER SHEET |
| | M401 INDICATES A 3-TON SYSTEM FOR THE 1ST LEVEL SYSTEM. |
| | PLEASE NOTE THAT THE SYSTEM IS MISLABED AC-B, AND REFER |
| | TO SECTION R403.6.1.1FBC-14 ENERGY CONSERVATION WHICH |
| | REQUIRES SYSTEMS TO BE SIZED NOT LESS NOT THAN THE |
| | CALCULATED LOADS. |
| | B) AC CALCULATIONS HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED FOR ACA- 02 |
| | HOWEVER THE PLANS ARE INDICATING ACB-02. |
| | C) AC CALCULATIONS HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED FOR VAV A-01B, |
| | HOWEVER THAT SYSTEM IS NOT SHOWN ON THE PLANS. |
| | D) THE SUBMITTED ENERGY CALCULATION FORM R405-2014 |
| | SHOWS COMPLIANCE DATA FOR A SINGLE COOLING SYSTEM WHICH |
| | APPEARS TO ACTUALLY BE COMPLIANCE DATA FOR THE TWO |
| | 4-TON SYSTEMS SHOWN IN THE SCHEDULE COMBINED AND |
| | AVERAGED. PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLIANCE DATA FOR EACH |
| | INDIVIDUAL SYSTEM AND COMPARE WITH THE PLANS WHICH |
| | INDICATES A 3-TON AND A 4-TON SYSTEM. |
| | E) THE AC CALCULATIONS ARE INDICATING THE FRONT DOOR |
| | FACES EAST HOWEVER THE FRONT DOOR IS FACING NORTH. |
| | |
| | CHRISTOPHER L. COLE |
| | MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6719 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
